Ok, heres my opinion...Thats all it is, take it for what its worth. The GeForce 2 Ultra is sweet. And 64 meg makes a huge difference in fps. But! Unless you drop some serious buckage on a monitor, your wastin cash..Ex. Why buy a sweet vid card to then have your bottleneck be monitor. You wouldnt be using 1024x768 on a 15". So, buy spending 500 on a vid card, you almost ensure you'll be spending AT LEAST that n a monitor just top use all that power of the vid card. i use a ATI Radeon 32 DDR. Man, I love this card. It looks amazing and @ 200, was a steal.
(Note to above post: If you dont like the Radeon, dont tell me. I dont care. If your having problems its because YOU dont know what your doing, so dont tell me "blah blah , the card doesnt work...blah blah blah"
Anyways, if your looking for that high end of a card, i would recommend the Radoen 64, NOT because I like ATI so much, but because of features. Ok, the ATI features 3 texel mapping, on 2 pipelines. The GeForce does 2 texel mapping on 4 pipelines. So, right now the GeForce posts better FPS because it has more *raw* power. But, if (and I think they will) games start to use 3 texel shading instead of the current 2, the Radeon is going to %way% blow the GeForce out of the water. Also, the Radoen uses a good compression algprythm to use its bandwidth better, not stronger. Either way, both are good cards. Look at it like this (I read this somewhere, sounded good) the Radeon is like a prsche, the GeForce like a Viper. Both go way way fast and look way way cool. One does it with brute force, one does it with style.....
Disclaimer: The reason I say dont tell me about your crap hardware not working is not because I'm an ass. Its because someone assumes because he / she cant get their hardware to work that suddenly its crap and they bash it up and down. If you have a *question* why it doesnt work, I will help you solve it. If your saying "dont get x because it sucks! It doesnt work..." Well, then anybody who really knows computers will know that the problem probably isnt the hardware is it?....
(Note to above post: If you dont like the Radeon, dont tell me. I dont care. If your having problems its because YOU dont know what your doing, so dont tell me "blah blah , the card doesnt work...blah blah blah"
Anyways, if your looking for that high end of a card, i would recommend the Radoen 64, NOT because I like ATI so much, but because of features. Ok, the ATI features 3 texel mapping, on 2 pipelines. The GeForce does 2 texel mapping on 4 pipelines. So, right now the GeForce posts better FPS because it has more *raw* power. But, if (and I think they will) games start to use 3 texel shading instead of the current 2, the Radeon is going to %way% blow the GeForce out of the water. Also, the Radoen uses a good compression algprythm to use its bandwidth better, not stronger. Either way, both are good cards. Look at it like this (I read this somewhere, sounded good) the Radeon is like a prsche, the GeForce like a Viper. Both go way way fast and look way way cool. One does it with brute force, one does it with style.....
Disclaimer: The reason I say dont tell me about your crap hardware not working is not because I'm an ass. Its because someone assumes because he / she cant get their hardware to work that suddenly its crap and they bash it up and down. If you have a *question* why it doesnt work, I will help you solve it. If your saying "dont get x because it sucks! It doesnt work..." Well, then anybody who really knows computers will know that the problem probably isnt the hardware is it?....