• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

My latest Ultra beast collection

D

desprado

Golden Member
My latest Ultra beast collection

9jge.jpg


gdyv.jpg


fhtn.jpg
 
I have to say in BF4 CF is so much better than SLI but overall SLI is still far better and CF has improved a lot.
 
Silverforce11 said:
So you went out and switched from 3 way SLI 780 to R290s just for BF4... must really love that game!
Click to expand...
No i dont love BF4.I just wanted to experience BF4 and some other AMD games coming with that so called Mantle hype that is why so i wanted experience my self and comment.

So far 2 GTX 780 sli is better is most of games but in BF4 3 GTX 780 SLI is only 10% faster than 2 r9 290
 
desprado said:
I have to say in BF4 CF is so much better than SLI but overall SLI is still far better and CF has improved a lot.
Click to expand...

It's hard to simply make a broad statement like that. If you are talking Eyefinity on anything but Hawaii, and possibly DX9 games (I haven't seen any reviews recently with DX9), you are correct, "SLI is still far better". In any other situation I've seen reported on though they've said that Crossfire is as good of a gaming experience as SLI, with 4K gaming being better on Hawaii crossfire.
 
3DVagabond said:
It's hard to simply make a broad statement like that. If you are talking Eyefinity on anything but Hawaii, and possibly DX9 games (I haven't seen any reviews recently with DX9), you are correct, "SLI is still far better". In any other situation I've seen reported on though they've said that Crossfire is as good of a gaming experience as SLI, with 4K gaming being better on Hawaii crossfire.
Click to expand...
Bro i have tried games like Facrcry 3 ,Fear 3 and Crysis 2 all run so much better on SLI but Crysis 3 no doubt run 10 to 15% faster in CF that is the fact.
 
Last edited:
Yes certainly Crysis 2/3 is better on SLI, Farcry 3 the stutter fix was patched, it used to be really bad for all multi GPUs. So yeah it depends on the games you play, certain ones go best with NV while others go best with AMD.
 
Silverforce11 said:
Yes certainly Crysis 2/3 is better on SLI, Farcry 3 the stutter fix was patched, it used to be really bad for all multi GPUs. So yeah it depends on the games you play, certain ones go best with NV while others go best with AMD.
Click to expand...

U are right.I tried Farcry 3 with GTX 780 SLI it was giving with MSAA 4x enable so with giving around normal 80 to 90 fps and with CF Lol 40 to 50fps max but in games like Crysis 3 totally a different story CF was more smooth and less FPS drop compare to SLI.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top