• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

My interpretation of human history from watching "ancient aliens"

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,353
1,862
126
EVERYONE IS WRONG.
The aliens came through the Stargate and enslaved humanity. The naive people thought the goa'uld was a god and thus voluntarily became their slaves.
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Aliens were living with close contact with humans some 8k to 5k years ago, they mainly lived in space ships outside the upper atmosphere. There were probably two or more groups who occasionally fought with each other. They could not come and live on earth for probably environmental reasons. They somehow mastered the tech of incarnation and came down here as humans and other animals.
They shared their knowledge and intelligence with humans. They wanted to give a lot more to humans but were frustrated with our limited intelligence. So they became fascinated with the idea of imprinting this planet with their DNA and artificially impregnated some women around the world from time to time. Eventually the decided to do a complete overhaul of the whole human species and created Noah and asked him to collect DNA of all animals, destroyed all living beings by drowning them. Eventually Noah and his wifey started a new, alien DNA mixed version of human species and they restored the animals as they were before.
They probably did this overhaul coz they had to leave, go back to their home planet and they knew they wont be able to come back till the next solar system alignment in 2012, but they wanted us to eventually become as intelligent as them.

dude I was just about to say that
 

DesiPower

Lifer
Nov 22, 2008
15,299
740
126
And what do you think? We got here from adam and eve?

hmm... interesting, totally forgot about them. So gave it some thought and here's my take on them.

The same Aliens created Adam and Eve long time back probably another 10 to 15k years ago and put them in a glass enclosure with all earth like features. When Adam ate the apple, he basically basically attached a complicated piece of organic command module that was created using the alien DNA, to his brain. That basically failed their entire experiment as now they knew who they really were and who the Aliens really were, the aliens were pissed off and put Adam and Eve on earth, where they eventually wanted to put them anyways, but after a long series of test runs and experiments. The snake was probably a opposition group like PITA or something that wanted to sabotage the whole thing.
For many many years before that they have been basically putting prototypes on earth to test and experiment... we know them as Neanderthals.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
EvD got VERY tame in his claims, especially in his recent documentations and books. He does NOT try to prove anything, he actually said

"We dont have ANY evidence...i wish we had, but we dont".

He encourages people to THINK, including scientists. He also admits that some of his theories from earlier books were wrong.

Do i agree with ALL what he proclaims? No.

Its just very naive and stupid to say "only stupid x-files freaks believe what he says".

Conventional science is FULL of examples where scientists came up with a theory and are 100% unable to see a theory from another angle respective - they DO NOT HAVE conclusive proof for their theories EITHER.

Let's just take the Nazca "lines" as an example. I know of one conventional theory which claims the Nazca lines are something like "running lanes" for whoever ancient culture lived at that time. Now...this is a nice and "convenient" theory....but there is as much proof that those lines and drawings were used for running as there is proof for whatever other interpretation.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
Let's just take the Nazca "lines" as an example. I know of one conventional theory which claims the Nazca lines are something like "running lanes" for whoever ancient culture lived at that time. Now...this is a nice and "convenient" theory....but there is as much proof that those lines and drawings were used for running as there is proof for whatever other interpretation.

see, that's EXACTLY the point. The nuts are the ones who latch onto the Alien theories as if they are the only logical theory. That's what we're talking about here. It's all fun and games to be speculative, as Daniken's theories are purely speculative. It's quite another to run with them as solid theory with no more evidence to support them.

That, and again: it is the LEAST LOGICAL, LEAST PLAUSIBLE theory when considering the evidence THAT DOES EXIST.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
yes of course they are speculative :)

But i dont think he pulls the theories (as speculative as they might be) out of "thin air". At least he tries to tie "legends" and findings together...the rest is on you to interpret.

So..if i find rock drawings all over the world depicting some ancient figures who look amazingly similar to astronauts - AND i have "legends" from the same culture which indeed refer to "Gods from the Stars"....its legit to speculate further, IMO.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
Also..what the **** is "speculative"?

Big Bang theory is speculative....multiverse theory is speculative and many other theories. Centuries ago it was considered fact that the earth was flat.
30 years ago you should have mentioned "wormholes"..they probably would've put you in a looney bin...
 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,865
105
106
Also..what the **** is "speculative"?

Big Bang theory is speculative....multiverse theory is speculative and many other theories. Centuries ago it was considered fact that the earth was flat.
30 years ago you should have mentioned "wormholes"..they probably would've put you in a looney bin...

Go study theoretical physics.

Oh wait, you wouldn't understand the math.

Unlike believing in aliens, theories in physics are based on mathematics. In many cases, the math leads us to the theory. It's not a matter of believing in something and trying to come up with the math to justify it.

But you're not a thinker. So why I'm bothering to even try to address your irrationalities is beyond me.
 

Iron Woode

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 10, 1999
31,298
12,818
136
Also..what the **** is "speculative"?

Big Bang theory is speculative....multiverse theory is speculative and many other theories. Centuries ago it was considered fact that the earth was flat.
30 years ago you should have mentioned "wormholes"..they probably would've put you in a looney bin...
You dunn goofed.