*BUMP* Apologize to bring up an old thread, but didn't want to create a new one making it redundant
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
.
The situations for the graphics driver has been pretty bad for the GMA X3000. Some very hard to find benchmarks show that the business version, the GMA 3000 performs approximately 10-15% better in 3DMark(X3000 is faster in 06 because GMA 3000 can't run some portions). Other data I gathered also seem to indicate similar performance trend.
Intel now has a development guide page specifically for GMA X3000
http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/recent/334680.htm?page=1
Some surprising information that was previously unknown:
"The GMA X3000 architecture marks a departure from the zone rendering architecture."
That debunks PowerVR licensing for G965 right there. It also confirms a report from a PowerVR representative that Intel's graphics for desktop isn't based on PowerVR(I don't think they want to license anyway, they would rather do it the other way if possible).
From what I can make out:
G965/GMA X3000: DX9 support with SM3.0, now on the desktop
GM965: DX10 support with SM4.0, on the mobile platform Santa Rosa
G33: Extension to the G965
G35: Higher end version supporting DX10/SM4.0, some more advanced features like HDMI
Now some people may disagree with me on the GM965 supporting DX10 while G965 doesn't. From the development page, G965 only has 24-bit precision for Pixel Shader, which means its equivalent to SM2.0. It has 8K x 8K 2D textures, which is between the requirement for DX9 SM 3.0 and DX10 SM 4.0. So the impression I get is most of the graphics unit is DX10, but there are some things that are definitely not DX10, hence the software support rumor.
GM965 rumors put DX10 SM3.0:
http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/1971_large_specs_g965.png
The article talks about G965, but the pic in the presentation is obviously for the mobile version. There were also conflicting news whether it'll really support DX10 SM4.0, and it came out to be that it'll be supported in software:
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/itnews.php?tid=653301&starttime=0&endtime=0
"Bearlake-G+ is the first IGP with DirectX10 hardware supported, where G965 and Bearlake-G would get DirectX 10 supported by software only."
Enough about the G965 core, the graphics driver version 14.26 is to be released in a matter of days, with Hardware T&L and VS 2.0 support, currently, it only supports hardware PS 3.0.