imported_Tomato
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2002
- 7,608
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: MartyMcFly3
Like Deerslayer said, Computer Generated or not its still sick
Originally posted by: MartyMcFly3
Would you take your child to a pediatrician that looked at those SuperTool?
Originally posted by: fatkorean
I would be freaked by this also had it been my daughters pediatrician...
But hat would happen if he is innocent? His practice would still be killed because of this. What recourse would he have? Move to a different state? Sue?
-fk
Originally posted by: prvteye2003
Originally posted by: Ynog
Originally posted by: ivol07
I hope you never left your daughter alone with him.
Thats one reason you don't ever leave children alone with a docter.
it's doctor
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: prvteye2003
Originally posted by: Ynog
Originally posted by: ivol07
I hope you never left your daughter alone with him.
Thats one reason you don't ever leave children alone with a docter.
it's doctor
Speaking of which, maybe you should see a proctologist.
Originally posted by: Lucky
On March 13, detectives reportedly found the computer-generated images at Moore?s East State Street office.
note the bolded words.
Originally posted by: Lucky
note the bolded words.On March 13, detectives reportedly found the computer-generated images at Moore?s East State Street office.
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Lucky
On March 13, detectives reportedly found the computer-generated images at Moore?s East State Street office.
note the bolded words.
Also note "?There is nothing alleging any of his patients or local children were part of this,? said Rockford Deputy Police Chief Dominic Iasparro. "
"Iasparro also would not elaborate on why Moore?s arrest came six months after the discovery of the photographs. "
Just because a reporter says "computer generated" does not nessesarily mean "computer generated" the person writing the article could mean JPG images = computer generated imaging, not true photographs of children or digitally taken pictures of kids.
Before you morons sit here and protect this sicko, know the actual facts to the case and quit speculating.
This guy is a freaking sicko for having ANY form of images in any respect on ANY computer. Much less a computer that is in a pediatric office and around kids day to day.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
I don't have kids. But if I did, there would be a lot of people I wouldn't take them to. That doesn't mean that those people should be arrested for thought crimes.Originally posted by: MartyMcFly3 Would you take your child to a pediatrician that looked at those SuperTool?
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Lucky
On March 13, detectives reportedly found the computer-generated images at Moore?s East State Street office.
note the bolded words.
Also note "?There is nothing alleging any of his patients or local children were part of this,? said Rockford Deputy Police Chief Dominic Iasparro. "
"Iasparro also would not elaborate on why Moore?s arrest came six months after the discovery of the photographs. "
Just because a reporter says "computer generated" does not nessesarily mean "computer generated" the person writing the article could mean JPG images = computer generated imaging, not true photographs of children or digitally taken pictures of kids.
Before you morons sit here and protect this sicko, know the actual facts to the case and quit speculating.
This guy is a freaking sicko for having ANY form of images in any respect on ANY computer. Much less a computer that is in a pediatric office and around kids day to day.
Why don't you know the actual facts before you start persecuting a man. Stop speculating, moron.![]()
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Lucky
On March 13, detectives reportedly found the computer-generated images at Moore?s East State Street office.
note the bolded words.
Also note "?There is nothing alleging any of his patients or local children were part of this,? said Rockford Deputy Police Chief Dominic Iasparro. "
"Iasparro also would not elaborate on why Moore?s arrest came six months after the discovery of the photographs. "
Just because a reporter says "computer generated" does not nessesarily mean "computer generated" the person writing the article could mean JPG images = computer generated imaging, not true photographs of children or digitally taken pictures of kids.
Before you morons sit here and protect this sicko, know the actual facts to the case and quit speculating.
This guy is a freaking sicko for having ANY form of images in any respect on ANY computer. Much less a computer that is in a pediatric office and around kids day to day.
Why don't you know the actual facts before you start persecuting a man. Stop speculating, moron.![]()
It's not speculation when a detective has found said images on his personal computer and an arrest has been made. Stop being an idiot.![]()
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
...They were still on his computer. It's obvious a patient or collegue is the one who complained. He's also not defended his these "allegations".
Originally posted by: Savij
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
...They were still on his computer. It's obvious a patient or collegue is the one who complained. He's also not defended his these "allegations".
Where do you get that information from? I didn't see it anywhere in the article.
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Lucky
On March 13, detectives reportedly found the computer-generated images at Moore?s East State Street office.
note the bolded words.
Also note "?There is nothing alleging any of his patients or local children were part of this,? said Rockford Deputy Police Chief Dominic Iasparro. "
"Iasparro also would not elaborate on why Moore?s arrest came six months after the discovery of the photographs. "
Just because a reporter says "computer generated" does not nessesarily mean "computer generated" the person writing the article could mean JPG images = computer generated imaging, not true photographs of children or digitally taken pictures of kids.
Before you morons sit here and protect this sicko, know the actual facts to the case and quit speculating.
This guy is a freaking sicko for having ANY form of images in any respect on ANY computer. Much less a computer that is in a pediatric office and around kids day to day.
