My C2D E4500 Vs AMD II X2 250 worth it?

qtnguyen87

Senior member
Feb 19, 2010
550
1
76
I am planning to upgrade and microcenter has that very nice deal i want for $65. Would i see an impressive amount of increase of speed?
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
i think the 250 might end up being say 15% faster but it probably wouldnt' be super noticeable at stock speeds.
 

fffblackmage

Platinum Member
Dec 28, 2007
2,548
0
76
Under stock conditions, I'd say the 250 is faster. Overclocked, less difference in performance between the two. Not really a worthy upgrade IMO.
 

tweakboy

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2010
9,517
2
81
www.hammiestudios.com
What are you getting for 60 bucks ? Also listen to the gurus

in that rig you can throw in a 5850 or nVidia 260 216 shader pipelines

trust me dont limit yourself,, get the most you can get just about. Spending 100 or soo on a video card is a sin lol
 

LoneNinja

Senior member
Jan 5, 2009
825
0
0
wha? I woulda swore they were still die harvested

Athlon II X2 was never die harvested, it has been since launch, and still is AMD's only native dual core based on k10.(At least for desktop). One clear way to back that up is look at L2 cache, it has more per core than any other AMD processor right now. If it was a disabled quad, how did it get more L2 cache than the quad?

Phenom II X2 on the other hand, just like Athlon X2 7X50 series were both crippled quads.
 

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,732
432
126
Athlon II X2 was never die harvested, it has been since launch, and still is AMD's only native dual core based on k10.(At least for desktop). One clear way to back that up is look at L2 cache, it has more per core than any other AMD processor right now. If it was a disabled quad, how did it get more L2 cache than the quad?

Phenom II X2 on the other hand, just like Athlon X2 7X50 series were both crippled quads.

+1.

To the OP - I would try to save for at least an Athlon II X3 and might still not make a noticeable difference in most of your applications.
 

alyarb

Platinum Member
Jan 25, 2009
2,425
0
76
yeah if you are upgrading from a dual core to a dual core, you will be disappointed unless you wait for 3.33 GHz clarkdale+mobo for $60 deals to come along. your computer is fine though, have you tried overclocking it? Should be able to hit at least 2.8 GHz. but generally speaking you don't need any higher than 2.4 GHz unless you're doing real work or real games.
 

spdfreak

Senior member
Mar 6, 2000
979
76
91
I have an E4500 in my HTPC and simply set the FSB to 1333 which OCed it to 2.93GHz. Didn't even need to bump the Vcore. Those are very overclockable chips.
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
Athlon II X2 was never die harvested, it has been since launch, and still is AMD's only native dual core based on k10.(At least for desktop). One clear way to back that up is look at L2 cache, it has more per core than any other AMD processor right now. If it was a disabled quad, how did it get more L2 cache than the quad?

Phenom II X2 on the other hand, just like Athlon X2 7X50 series were both crippled quads.

only very few Athlon ii X2s are die harvested... but only to make sempron 140/145s. but athlon IIs are the perfect dies.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
You'd be better with the other two MicroCenter deals.....the Athlon II X4 630 or the Phenom II X2 555 Black for $99.99. Both come with the same motherboard as the $65 deal, but better processors.

And don't know about that Biostar A760G M2+ motherboard, but more than a few people have successfully unlocked the other two cores in that Phenom cpu above.