- Aug 14, 2000
- 22,709
- 3,003
- 126
Excuse me? Are you reading the same thread I am? You didn't "force" anything out of me. nVidia's drivers are the cause of the problem and that's a fact.It is you thats has done the tune changing
From a faulty crash prone nV40 to faulty drivers to nForce3. I've had to force the real problem out of you over many posts.
It's not a faulty NF3.
It's not a faulty card.
You are simply twisting my comments into more strawman arguments. I never said or implied the GPU or the motherboard was faulty. It's nVidia's drivers. Is that clear enough for you?
Two Radeon cards running ATi drivers in a very stable state vehemently disagaree.Out of all that, the issue *clearly* rests with nForce3.
This has what to do with the core issue of nVidia's poor driver programming?I really couldn't care less about DEP. I certainly haven't needed it to run a secure and reliable machine for upwards of 3 years.
This has what to do with your comment "Microsoft's incompetence" not only being unfounded but also grossly inaccurate?
Yes, they do interact differently. From an engineering standpoint they are more stable and more compatible than nVidia's drivers.The Radeons are irrelevant to the discussion because their drivers interact with the nForce3 chipset differently to nVidia's drivers.
This would be a good example if it applied in this case but it doesn't. ATi's drivers not only have a full AGP implementation but SmartGART can detect problems with the chipset and disable AGP functions that aren't working properly (it never disabled any for me I might add).It's just like in the TnT Vs AGP Voodoo days, the Voodoo's treated AGP llike an overgrown PCI slot, so were largely unaffected by AGP drivers bugs rampant at the time.
The problem here is nVidia's aggressive optimizations. They attempt to win benchmarks at any cost including stability.nVidia on the other hand made full use of the interface and is/was far more sensitive to any shortcomings chipset wise or driver wise that may be present.