My 2.8C results

[WaTaGuMp]

Well it was time to try out my good ole 2.8C and Asus P4C800-E Deluxe in the O/C department. Lets just say I always end up with less then average O/C's. This was done using the Corsair 3200 TwinX 1024 C2 not the LL.

First I will show some O/C,s with auto settings cause wanted to find the ceiling on this chip.

220 FSB= Sandra scores of 4081/4084 at 2.5 4 4 8 (4)
225 FSB= 4148 4189
230 FSB= 4287 4280
235 FSB= 4365 4374
240 FSB= windows wouldnt load

Next test was 5:4

230 FSB= 4734 4669 2.5 4 4 8 (4)
230 FSB= 4945 4879 2.5 3 3 6 (4)
235 FSB= 5032 5017 2.5 3 3 6 (4)

Now for the 1:1 tests

200 FSB= 4617 4608 2 3 3 6 (4)
200 FSB= 4639 4589 2 3 3 6 (8)
210 FSB= 4854 4926 2.5 3 3 6 (4)
215 FSB= 4962 4927 2.5 3 3 6 (4)
220 FSB= 5074 5053 2.5 3 3 6 (4)

Tried 220 at 1:1 2 3 3 6 (4) failed

So as of right now I am stable at the 220 FSB 1:1 with 2.5 3 3 6 (4) 2.85 DDR voltage.

Like I said every time I do this I end up with what seems to be a bad chip. :brokenheart:

 

[Technonut]

Don't feel bad, mine tops out @ 3.15GHz.... There are many 2.8C's that are in this neighborhood.

 

[WaTaGuMp]

Originally posted by: Technonut
Don't feel bad, mine tops out @ 3.15GHz.... There are many 2.8C's that are in this neighborhood.

Your higher then me at least LOL. I just tried 1.6 volts and 225 wouldnt post.

 

[shoman94]

242fsb @ 1.65v....249fsb @ 1.70v

I really wish these chips did 255-260fsb

 

[BaboonGuy]

how much better performance does 1:1 ratio give you vs. 5:4?

 

[WaTaGuMp]

Originally posted by: BaboonGuy
how much better performance does 1:1 ratio give you vs. 5:4?

If your asking me the numbers tell the story for memory scores, didnt do any other benches just memory.

The 1:1 is slighty better in scores but minimal, might try some more tests tomorrow and see what I get.