• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Must See PS3 VIDEOS !!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: James3shin
the MGS4 trailer is real time homies.
Click to expand...

i think it has some after-effects added, like motion blur. makes it look a helluva better, even though the realtime is still beautiful.
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Yawn. You're the same fvcking idiot that went on and on about how the PS3 would make the computer obsolete and all that BS.

You also gave all kinds of wrong FUD/information about the xbox 360 in an attempt to make it look bad. Misquoting price, 2 game disc, saying xbox live was $70 and on and on.

Additionally, you believe the PS3 is a super somputer and better than anything out there.

This is a great quote from you

"Show me a pc anywhere you can buy that is even close as powerfull as PS3 please!The CEll will dwarf yr CPU+100 glued together. "

Just search his name and you'll see he's a Sony troll through and through.

People are unimpressed. Don't you get it yet?
Click to expand...

wow......lot of angst in here...
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Yawn. You're the same fvcking idiot that went on and on about how the PS3 would make the computer obsolete and all that BS.

You also gave all kinds of wrong FUD/information about the xbox 360 in an attempt to make it look bad. Misquoting price, 2 game disc, saying xbox live was $70 and on and on.

Additionally, you believe the PS3 is a super somputer and better than anything out there.

This is a great quote from you

"Show me a pc anywhere you can buy that is even close as powerfull as PS3 please!The CEll will dwarf yr CPU+100 glued together. "

Just search his name and you'll see he's a Sony troll through and through.

People are unimpressed. Don't you get it yet?
Click to expand...

Since you appear to love the Deftones and have valid points, I agree.
 
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Yawn. You're the same fvcking idiot that went on and on about how the PS3 would make the computer obsolete and all that BS.

You also gave all kinds of wrong FUD/information about the xbox 360 in an attempt to make it look bad. Misquoting price, 2 game disc, saying xbox live was $70 and on and on.

Additionally, you believe the PS3 is a super somputer and better than anything out there.

This is a great quote from you

"Show me a pc anywhere you can buy that is even close as powerfull as PS3 please!The CEll will dwarf yr CPU+100 glued together. "

Just search his name and you'll see he's a Sony troll through and through.

People are unimpressed. Don't you get it yet?
Click to expand...

wow......lot of angst in here...
Click to expand...

This guy is spamming PS3 crap all over the forums and has been telling FUD/lies about the 360. He's a troll.

FYI: He cross posted this in video also.

As stated: Go search his user name. He's an idiot.
 
How can people play these games with crazy graphics and controls harder to master than F1 driving?

Give me some good ole NES or SNES.
 
Like i said 360 is crap compared to PS3,Looking at the numbers its common sense
What are all you guys then who do nothing but look up PC?Sorry but i dont have the money for a new CPU,2 GPU,1G RAM,MOBO,600 WATT PSU,HDDVD Player.PS3
will do all that and more for the price of the CPU.BWAHAHA

PS3
Cell (3.2 GHz POWER-based PPE with seven 3.2 GHz SPEs)
167 (aprox) GFLOPS
10 billion dot products per second

VS
360
3.2 GHz IBM PowerPC tri-core codenamed "Xenon"
115 GFLOPS
9.1 billion dot products per second

PS3
550 MHz RSX (based on NVIDIA G70 architecture)
1.67 TFLOPS (theoretical)
74.8 billion shader operations per second (100 billion with CPU)
28.6 billion dot products per second
Distinct Pixel & Vertex Shaders, SM3.0

VS
360
500 MHz codenamed "Xenos" (ATI custom design)
1 TFLOPS (system theoretical)
48 billion shader operations per second [1]
9.6 billion dot products per second
Unified Shaders, SM3.0+
10 MB eDRAM (internal bandwidth of 256GB/s)




 
Originally posted by: sourshishke
Like i said 360 is crap compared to PS3,Looking at the numbers its common sense
What are all you guys then who do nothing but look up PC?Sorry but i dont have the money for a new CPU,2 GPU,1G RAM,MOBO,600 WATT PSU,HDDVD Player.PS3
will do all that and more for the price of the CPU.BWAHAHA

PS3
Cell (3.2 GHz POWER-based PPE with seven 3.2 GHz SPEs)
167 (aprox) GFLOPS
10 billion dot products per second

VS
360
3.2 GHz IBM PowerPC tri-core codenamed "Xenon"
115 GFLOPS
9.1 billion dot products per second

PS3
550 MHz RSX (based on NVIDIA G70 architecture)
1.67 TFLOPS (theoretical)
74.8 billion shader operations per second (100 billion with CPU)
28.6 billion dot products per second
Distinct Pixel & Vertex Shaders, SM3.0

VS
360
500 MHz codenamed "Xenos" (ATI custom design)
1 TFLOPS (system theoretical)
48 billion shader operations per second [1]
9.6 billion dot products per second
Unified Shaders, SM3.0+
10 MB eDRAM (internal bandwidth of 256GB/s)
Click to expand...

I don't suppose you remember Sony's statements on how much better the PS2 would be than the Dreamcast..they put out numbers too, you know. Also had a video of a girl with flowing hair..they said that's what games would look like.

It's sad how easily you're falling for Sony's marketing.
 
Originally posted by: Auryg
Originally posted by: sourshishke
Like i said 360 is crap compared to PS3,Looking at the numbers its common sense
What are all you guys then who do nothing but look up PC?Sorry but i dont have the money for a new CPU,2 GPU,1G RAM,MOBO,600 WATT PSU,HDDVD Player.PS3
will do all that and more for the price of the CPU.BWAHAHA

PS3
Cell (3.2 GHz POWER-based PPE with seven 3.2 GHz SPEs)
167 (aprox) GFLOPS
10 billion dot products per second

VS
360
3.2 GHz IBM PowerPC tri-core codenamed "Xenon"
115 GFLOPS
9.1 billion dot products per second

PS3
550 MHz RSX (based on NVIDIA G70 architecture)
1.67 TFLOPS (theoretical)
74.8 billion shader operations per second (100 billion with CPU)
28.6 billion dot products per second
Distinct Pixel & Vertex Shaders, SM3.0

VS
360
500 MHz codenamed "Xenos" (ATI custom design)
1 TFLOPS (system theoretical)
48 billion shader operations per second [1]
9.6 billion dot products per second
Unified Shaders, SM3.0+
10 MB eDRAM (internal bandwidth of 256GB/s)
Click to expand...

I don't suppose you remember Sony's statements on how much better the PS2 would be than the Dreamcast..they put out numbers too, you know. Also had a video of a girl with flowing hair..they said that's what games would look like.

It's sad how easily you're falling for Sony's marketing.
Click to expand...

YES but this time IBM and NVIDIA are PARTNERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Originally posted by: sourshishke
<snip>
YES but this time IBM and NVIDIA are PARTNERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Even if the PS3 turns out to be the greatest bundle of circuits and breadboards ever, at this time you're still acting like a TOOL!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Originally posted by: sourshishke
Like i said 360 is crap compared to PS3,Looking at the numbers its common sense
What are all you guys then who do nothing but look up PC?Sorry but i dont have the money for a new CPU,2 GPU,1G RAM,MOBO,600 WATT PSU,HDDVD Player.PS3
will do all that and more for the price of the CPU.BWAHAHA

PS3
Cell (3.2 GHz POWER-based PPE with seven 3.2 GHz SPEs)
167 (aprox) GFLOPS
10 billion dot products per second

VS
360
3.2 GHz IBM PowerPC tri-core codenamed "Xenon"
115 GFLOPS
9.1 billion dot products per second

PS3
550 MHz RSX (based on NVIDIA G70 architecture)
1.67 TFLOPS (theoretical)
74.8 billion shader operations per second (100 billion with CPU)
28.6 billion dot products per second
Distinct Pixel & Vertex Shaders, SM3.0

VS
360
500 MHz codenamed "Xenos" (ATI custom design)
1 TFLOPS (system theoretical)
48 billion shader operations per second [1]
9.6 billion dot products per second
Unified Shaders, SM3.0+
10 MB eDRAM (internal bandwidth of 256GB/s)
Click to expand...

So if the 360 is crap, why do you claim to own one in one of your other threads?
 
Originally posted by: buzzsaw13
Originally posted by: sourshishke
Like i said 360 is crap compared to PS3,Looking at the numbers its common sense
What are all you guys then who do nothing but look up PC?Sorry but i dont have the money for a new CPU,2 GPU,1G RAM,MOBO,600 WATT PSU,HDDVD Player.PS3
will do all that and more for the price of the CPU.BWAHAHA

PS3
Cell (3.2 GHz POWER-based PPE with seven 3.2 GHz SPEs)
167 (aprox) GFLOPS
10 billion dot products per second

VS
360
3.2 GHz IBM PowerPC tri-core codenamed "Xenon"
115 GFLOPS
9.1 billion dot products per second

PS3
550 MHz RSX (based on NVIDIA G70 architecture)
1.67 TFLOPS (theoretical)
74.8 billion shader operations per second (100 billion with CPU)
28.6 billion dot products per second
Distinct Pixel & Vertex Shaders, SM3.0

VS
360
500 MHz codenamed "Xenos" (ATI custom design)
1 TFLOPS (system theoretical)
48 billion shader operations per second [1]
9.6 billion dot products per second
Unified Shaders, SM3.0+
10 MB eDRAM (internal bandwidth of 256GB/s)
Click to expand...

So if the 360 is crap, why do you claim to own one in one of your other threads?
Click to expand...
Its not crap,im playing right now.Im just saying its better then 360.
 
first off, those PS3 specs arent likely to be true. apparently, info has been leaked out that sony has downgraded many of the components inside. supposedly, the 3.2ghz processor has been downgraded to 2.8ghz.
 
Originally posted by: sourshishke

Its not crap,im playing right now.Im just saying its better then 360.
Click to expand...

You're a moron and everyone knows it.

Do you even realize that numbers mean nothing at this point? You're sitting here talking about a machine that Sony can't even freaking produce! It's late to the market, still months away.

Liken it to the P4 from Intel had much higher specs and AMD still beat it because of the way it was designed.

Xbox will have been released for a YEAR and it still has the visuals and tech to stay with or ahead of the PS3. Well sh1t I hope that Sony has a bit of a lead in the freaking specs, because they are so late to the market!

Additionally, the demos you've show are nothing great. As others have show, GoW looks better and it's coming out this year!
 
Originally posted by: Ichigo
You know, the graphics ARE nice, but I really didn't see anything added on to gameplay. Heavenly Sword looks like Ninja Gaiden with new moves, something that I think would've happened in Ninja Gaiden 2.
Click to expand...

It looks like a PS2 game with the same super overdone HDR CS:S uses, I'm not impressed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top