Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BiggieC
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: BiggieC
Originally posted by: no0b
...ratical muslims...
Isn't that kind of redundant. I really wish someone would give muslims a taste of ther own medicine. No other religious groups are terrorists or intolerant to the level of these people.
Oh... the irony...
I think its ok to be a little intolerant towards a group of people who savagely kill innocent civilians, rather than others who just share different beliefs, but i see how that difference might confuse someone of your stature.
My "stature?"
😕 😛
no0b stated his concern that people may turn against all Muslims for the crimes of some few and you unknowingly confirmed it. Hence, irony. That was all.
As for my opinion, I'm an individualist. I don't blame nor hold responsible an entire religion because they can't control their extreme rogue fringe element. An element which, btw, consistenly violates the tenets of their faith in the name of their faith (more irony). So I blame the individuals who actually commit the atrocities, not all Muslims. Or would you blame all Christians for the past atrocities of the IRA? And considering that most of the world sees the USA every bit as much as a "Christian nation" as they see Iraq as a "Muslim nation," would you then lump the US into the IRA's crimes as well?
Ah well, the most ironic part of this whole thing is that Mohammed probably would take one of those Miss World ladies to marry. He was kinda randy like that, had quite a number of wives (which was a common and accepted practice of the day). The reporter was right, and a lot of innocent people got killed because the truth was spoken. Very sad.
I think he was comenting on the fact I mispelled RADICAL.
edit: Uh, no.