muslims protest british troop homecoming

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: tvarad

No. These clowns are using the "letter of free speech" to kill it's spirit.

Most of these fellows are first or second generation descendants of very conservative low-skilled workers who emigrated to Britain. Unable to reconcile the conservative beliefs drummed into them at home with the liberal societies they grew up in, they have grown up with a lot of inbuilt hatred that they are channeling into such destructive activities.

No they are not at all. The only way to 'kill its spirit' is to use freedom of speech to attack freedom of speech directly. Protesting against an aggressive war, no matter how distasteful it is, is perfectly fine, atleast within US law. Its our first amendment, and it applies no matter you are a naturalized immigrant or the son of an immigrant (We call those 'Native Born')

Socio specifically said he would deny rights to immigrants (he hasn't been clear on descendents of immigrants, who IMO are just as native as he is).
 

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
Damn, I read this whole thread hoping to find out what color the boathouse at Hereford is. Money back plz.
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: tvarad

No. These clowns are using the "letter of free speech" to kill it's spirit.

Most of these fellows are first or second generation descendants of very conservative low-skilled workers who emigrated to Britain. Unable to reconcile the conservative beliefs drummed into them at home with the liberal societies they grew up in, they have grown up with a lot of inbuilt hatred that they are channeling into such destructive activities.

No they are not at all. The only way to 'kill its spirit' is to use freedom of speech to attack freedom of speech directly. Protesting against an aggressive war, no matter how distasteful it is, is perfectly fine, atleast within US law. Its our first amendment, and it applies no matter you are a naturalized immigrant or the son of an immigrant (We call those 'Native Born')

Socio specifically said he would deny rights to immigrants (he hasn't been clear on descendents of immigrants, who IMO are just as native as he is).

I agree with you, I only hope wish the Arab/Muslim protagonists living in countries where these freedoms are guaranteed would also heed your advice when it comes to depicting Mohammed in cartoons, for example. Or when people are supporting Israel in Sweden. Freedom of speech should cut both ways, shouldn't it?

As I said, these guys are a bunch of misfits, just like Hitler and his cohorts were, who are chumping the system.