• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Multitasking

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Barton 2500+ is under $100, and much better CPU overall than any Celeron, even at 3.6G.

That was the most far fetched statement I have ever seen. A Celeron 3.6 would stomp the crap out a Barton 2500. I read that the D meant dothan, nm I supose its just another meaningless letter like A, B, C, E, M
 
Originally posted by: Shenkoa
Barton 2500+ is under $100, and much better CPU overall than any Celeron, even at 3.6G.

That was the most far fetched statement I have ever seen. A Celeron 3.6 would stomp the crap out a Barton 2500. I read that the D meant dothan, nm I supose its just another meaningless letter like A, B, C, E, M

Well, I maybe wrong about that statement, I agree that. But reason why I said that is because you said multitasking is important. I mean, Celly is just too bad at multitasking. Not only because it has only 256KB L2 and longer pipe-line, but also worse L2 (4-way, if I remember right, which is half than P4s. That's a huge disadvantage because L2 cache is a huge performance fact to Intel's P4 architecture). If you didn't care about multitasking, then Celeron would be fine choice. But since you said multitasking is important fact (even the title of this thread is "Multitasking"), Celeron is the one you should never even think about. That's why I made such statement.

No matter how fast Celeron would be, Celeron is just a Celeron in matter of multitasking as long as it's P4 based. (If it was P3 based like Tualatin or Dothan, L2 cache difference is not such a huge difference. That's why Tualatin Celeron was such a great choice at that time. But we are talking about Celeron with thankful P4 architecture)
 
Originally posted by: Shenkoa
Barton 2500+ is under $100, and much better CPU overall than any Celeron, even at 3.6G.

That was the most far fetched statement I have ever seen. A Celeron 3.6 would stomp the crap out a Barton 2500. I read that the D meant dothan, nm I supose its just another meaningless letter like A, B, C, E, M

A Barton will beat any Celeron out right now IIRC. Especially if you OC that Barton.

-Kevin
 
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
Originally posted by: carlosd
Get a Barton 2500+, mobile if you can.

Dont get a Barton 2500+, mobile if you can.

Don't listen FelixDeCrap he's got an Extremely Expensive.

Get the mobile barton. Doesn't matter what you do with the celeron it would never beat an OC mobile Barton. Besides the barton multiplier is unlocked not the same about the celeron.
 
Back
Top