MSNBC's version of Bill O'Reilly...

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I saw two people who wouldn't answer questions.

I saw two people who couldn't answer questions.

They were that dumb?

 

[xj0hnx]

Anyone that doesn't see O'Donell as anything more than another partisan hack, is in fact nothing more than a partisan hack.

 

[LunarRay]

What you really need seeing is for our Hollywood Actor crowd to assemble their folks who portrayed a particular expert in what ever field or information source is being discussed so we can all sit down and be edified by the real experts...

Anyone with a bit of sense knows that each 'network' seeks to provide entertainment to a market... Their jobs depend on it...

Real power lies in knowing the facts... but the facts are distributed by the power holder at the moment. Real journalists who work to get facts are not easy to find... but they do exist... not on fox or msnbc.. but out in the pits with no glory... armed with just hard work and because it takes years to develop the ability to get to facts they'll never really be a known commodity... imo.

 

[CallMeJoe]

Why does everybody here pick on LoofaMan? Hannity's twice the douche that O'Reilly is.

 

[Lemon law]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe
Why does everybody here pick on LoofaMan? Hannity's twice the douche that O'Reilly is.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes yes my little chickadee, I love the theory of relative douche bags, simple pick the douche bag that best fits your political position and follow them off the nearest cliff.
No half way measures allowed, only the most extreme douche bag will suffice.

 

[Rockinacoustic]

Jesus Christ, at least O'reilly shuts people up after two or three tries.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I saw two people who wouldn't answer questions.

I saw two people who couldn't answer questions.

They were that dumb?

You're making yourself appear dumb and I know you're not.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: Lemon law

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe
Why does everybody here pick on LoofaMan? Hannity's twice the douche that O'Reilly is.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes yes my little chickadee, I love the theory of relative douche bags, simple pick the douche bag that best fits your political position and follow them off the nearest cliff.
No half way measures allowed, only the most extreme douche bag will suffice.

I dunno, he has a point. If it were possible for one man to be two douche bags, Hannity could be prime evidence.

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: Lemon law

No half way measures allowed, only the most extreme douche bag will suffice.

Which is why they all have jobs @ Faux, owned by the biggest douche bag of all, Rupert Murdoch, spreading his bags full of douchery across multiple media outlets.

 

[cKGunslinger]

Originally posted by: cubby1223

Originally posted by: eskimospy

Originally posted by: cubby1223
Just remember how much $$ General Electric, owner of MSNBC, is receiving from the Obama Administration through the "stimulus" bill - of course their goal now is to destroy the GOP by all possible means, whether honest or dirty.

Watching a bit too much O'Reilly I see.

I have to say O'Reilly is a lot more impartial than this MSNBC clown is.

lol?

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I saw two people who wouldn't answer questions.

I saw two people who couldn't answer questions.

They were that dumb?

You're making yourself appear dumb and I know you're not.

It's not an appearance. I am that dumb. I have no wit at all. I have no idea what you mean when you said they wouldn't answer. Ah, now I get it. I said they couldn't answer or they wouldn't get elected or reelected and you mean they wouldn't answer for the same reason?????? Is that it?

If so then why is it the interviewer who is to be faulted instead of the two clowns he interviewed?

 

[bamacre]

/facepalm

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: bamacre
/facepalm

I don't really know what /facepalm means either, something to do with shame, perhaps, but I don't have an of that either. I am what I am and there is nothing wrong either with not being smart or not knowing lingo. I know I hate myself and any shame you try to dump on me is your own. I am all filled up so what you try to give me is wasted.

So what do you mean by they wouldn't answer?

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
So what do you mean by they wouldn't answer?

That was a statement you made. I responded to it in saying that they couldn't answer. I assumed what I meant was obvious, that they couldn't answer due to repeated interruptions by O'Donnell. Everyone else in this thread knows what I am talking about. You don't?

 

[LunarRay]

Originally posted by: bamacre
/facepalm

What does that mean... I presume it is along the lines of "Oh My God"... or some show of unbelievability... or like that

 

[fskimospy]

Originally posted by: cubby1223

Originally posted by: eskimospy

Originally posted by: cubby1223
Just remember how much $$ General Electric, owner of MSNBC, is receiving from the Obama Administration through the "stimulus" bill - of course their goal now is to destroy the GOP by all possible means, whether honest or dirty.

Watching a bit too much O'Reilly I see.

I have to say O'Reilly is a lot more impartial than this MSNBC clown is.

You can't possibly believe that, do you?

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
So what do you mean by they wouldn't answer?

That was a statement you made. I responded to it in saying that they couldn't answer. I assumed what I meant was obvious, that they couldn't answer due to repeated interruptions by O'Donnell. Everyone else in this thread knows what I am talking about. You don't?

Hahahahaha, I didn't take into account the fact that you would lie. Since I don't I didn't expect it of you. The whole interview was to give them a chance to answer.

He asked for a yes or no answer but they insisted on spin. The first guy, the Kook, was far more sincere, however, in my opinion. I liked him. He was obviously far more adapted to looking like a nut, as if he were used to it. The Republican blow hard was just a big ass, a socialist supporter of Medicare to keep his job, while shouting socialism at the new wonderful Obama government plan that in 30 years everybody running for office will support automatically as a new third rail or whatever it is that becomes politically untouchable if you expect to get elected.

You have grown so used, I see, to allowing politicians not to answer questions, their specialty, that when they are forced to say yes or no, you see somebody trying to gag them.

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: LunarRay

Originally posted by: bamacre
/facepalm

What does that mean... I presume it is along the lines of "Oh My God"... or some show of unbelievability... or like that

I am not sure but I suspect it means you are so worthless that you should hide your face or else that you are so worthless some other can't bear to look at you. In either case I think it means you are worthless and that would be a natural conclusion since everybody feels that way and want to insure you do too. Hell is the place that everyone in it tries to keep everybody in it.

 

[dbk]

He did a great job not letting the congressman deviate from answering the question asked.

 

[seemingly random]

There is just so much repug material - and more coming by the minute. When o'donnell starts ignoring some of the overload and finds his groove, he will be feared.