- Jul 17, 2007
- 163
- 0
- 0
http://global.msi.com.tw/index...c=newsdesc&news_no=649
I wish these would start showing up with benchmarks.
I wish these would start showing up with benchmarks.
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
Regarding 512MB vs. 1GB, what is pretty much considered the point where 512MB becomes 'not enough'? I thought that AMD cards manage memory a bit better then Nvidia cards, so I guess you can't compare directly. My guess is 512MB would be enough in nearly all situations for 1680x1050 resolution... agree? Disagree? 1680x1050 4xAA, would there be a benefit to more then 512MB on a 4870? How about for 1980x1200 res? I'm sure a 30" monitor will benefit from this. I'm just trying to get an idea on if it'll be worth spending the extra for a 1GB 4870 or not. Right now I have a 22" monitor, but if I get a 4870 I may get a 24" some day. Thanks for any opinions.![]()
Originally posted by: Ares202
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
Regarding 512MB vs. 1GB, what is pretty much considered the point where 512MB becomes 'not enough'? I thought that AMD cards manage memory a bit better then Nvidia cards, so I guess you can't compare directly. My guess is 512MB would be enough in nearly all situations for 1680x1050 resolution... agree? Disagree? 1680x1050 4xAA, would there be a benefit to more then 512MB on a 4870? How about for 1980x1200 res? I'm sure a 30" monitor will benefit from this. I'm just trying to get an idea on if it'll be worth spending the extra for a 1GB 4870 or not. Right now I have a 22" monitor, but if I get a 4870 I may get a 24" some day. Thanks for any opinions.![]()
Theres been some reviews on this, basically 512mb can run out of memory on some games after 1920x1200
i dont have the link at hand, one was posted on the forums less than a week ago
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
Originally posted by: Ares202
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
Regarding 512MB vs. 1GB, what is pretty much considered the point where 512MB becomes 'not enough'? I thought that AMD cards manage memory a bit better then Nvidia cards, so I guess you can't compare directly. My guess is 512MB would be enough in nearly all situations for 1680x1050 resolution... agree? Disagree? 1680x1050 4xAA, would there be a benefit to more then 512MB on a 4870? How about for 1980x1200 res? I'm sure a 30" monitor will benefit from this. I'm just trying to get an idea on if it'll be worth spending the extra for a 1GB 4870 or not. Right now I have a 22" monitor, but if I get a 4870 I may get a 24" some day. Thanks for any opinions.![]()
Theres been some reviews on this, basically 512mb can run out of memory on some games after 1920x1200
i dont have the link at hand, one was posted on the forums less than a week ago
I've glanced at reviews, I just never saw a clear out of memory sign I guess. I figured that 512 should be ok-ish up to the 1980x1200 res, I'll probably stick with 512MB unless some kind of incredible deal comes on the 1024MB version.