• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mr. & Mrs. Smith

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Xanis
Angelina Jolie is bangin'
Click to expand...


If she didn't have the ugly skin art and wasn't such a complete whacko I would say she was almost the perfect woman.
Click to expand...

I thought it was understood that psychoism and "The Perfect Woman" went hand in hand?
I'll give her a mulligan on the tats.
9.7/10, clearly.
Click to expand...


She is absolutely gorgeous. Even with the ugly tats I would give her a 10 but I am too old for looks to be the only consideration where women are conccerned.
Click to expand...

It's the psycho factor, isn't it???
That'll get ya, man. 😀
 
Okay, so we have a bad movie with hot chick for those who consider her hot (which I don't)?

As an alternative I'll suggest "After the Sunset". Average movie with Salma who's much hotter than Angelina. 😀
 
Originally posted by: Robor
Okay, so we have a bad movie with hot chick for those who consider her hot (which I don't)?

As an alternative I'll suggest "After the Sunset". Average movie with Salma who's much hotter than Angelina. 😀
Click to expand...

I forgot all about Salma.
You raise a valid argument, Robor.
 
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: Xanis
Angelina Jolie is bangin'
Click to expand...


If she didn't have the ugly skin art and wasn't such a complete whacko I would say she was almost the perfect woman.
Click to expand...

I thought it was understood that psychoism and "The Perfect Woman" went hand in hand?
I'll give her a mulligan on the tats.
9.7/10, clearly.
Click to expand...


She is absolutely gorgeous. Even with the ugly tats I would give her a 10 but I am too old for looks to be the only consideration where women are conccerned.
Click to expand...

It's the psycho factor, isn't it???
That'll get ya, man. 😀
Click to expand...

Been there, done her. I had many reasons to hit the biatch but didn't, even women who I had never seen in my life came up to me in public and said "If I had done that I would have expected to be hit". Former Miss Wisconsin, in the Miss USA pageant, fantastically beautiful, willing to have sex just about anywere, under any conditions and just about anytime. Three and a half years of that psycho biatch drained me to the core. Never again....no women no matter how beautifull is worth going through that crap. The biatch had the audacity to tell me that I needed to sell my Shelby and buy HER a Mercedes.

Trust me guys, a lot of beautiful women are not worth the price you have to pay.
 
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Robor
Okay, so we have a bad movie with hot chick for those who consider her hot (which I don't)?

As an alternative I'll suggest "After the Sunset". Average movie with Salma who's much hotter than Angelina. 😀
Click to expand...

I forgot all about Salma.
You raise a valid argument, Robor.
Click to expand...

If you're into Salma do yourself a favor and rent After the Sunset. She looks *great* in it. While you're at it pick up From Dusk 'till Dawn for her snake dance scene. The movie is a trip as well if you're into a wild ride with Rodriguez & Tarantino. 😉
 
Originally posted by: JS80
I thought it was one of the worst movies of the year. The screenplay was horrible and the story made absolutely no sense, especially at the end.

Watching 2 hours of Jolie on the other hand...
Click to expand...

Im sure your other hand was quite busy 😉 😛
 
Originally posted by: JS80
I thought it was one of the worst movies of the year. The screenplay was horrible and the story made absolutely no sense, especially at the end.

Watching 2 hours of Jolie on the other hand...
Click to expand...

Yeah, that about sums it all up.
 
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Nik
Meh. Was boring. If the entire movie were about them trying to kill each other, it would have been epic. It wasn't. They have a little lover's spat and that's it. Then they team up and it becomes incredibly boring. :roll: What a waste of a movie.
Click to expand...

Pfffft.
Go get laid.
Click to expand...

Fixed.
 
I thought it was okay, but without Pitt and Jolie I don't think it would be garnering anywhere near as much interest.
 
Originally posted by: Robor
Haven't seen it yet but opinions from friends who I trust with movie opinions weren't positive. The word brutal was used. I may rent it during the week if I'm bored.
Click to expand...

same here, I have heard the same
 
Originally posted by: montanafan
I thought it was okay, but without Pitt and Jolie I don't think it would be garnering anywhere near as much interest.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you're right.
Who else could you possibly cast?
Morgan Freeman and Swoozie Kurtz?
 
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: Nik
Meh. Was boring. If the entire movie were about them trying to kill each other, it would have been epic. It wasn't. They have a little lover's spat and that's it. Then they team up and it becomes incredibly boring. :roll: What a waste of a movie.
Click to expand...

Pfffft.
Go lay down.
Click to expand...

I'm going to have to agree with Nik on this one. In the previews they made it seem like they would be fighting for the entire movie, but like 1/3 of the way through they've destroyed the entire house and i was left thinking (how the fvck are they gonna still fight if the house is destroyed).

Misleading an audience can be good, but doing in the previews is dumb. It was boring after they were done fighting each other.
 
Originally posted by: shilala
Originally posted by: montanafan
I thought it was okay, but without Pitt and Jolie I don't think it would be garnering anywhere near as much interest.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you're right.
Who else could you possibly cast?
Morgan Freeman and Swoozie Kurtz?
Click to expand...



When I saw it, my first thought was Will Smith. The jokes were similar to his kind of movies. Which is why I also laughed through most of the movie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top