• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Mp3 vs. .wma ?

Pro: Larger Compression (Smaller File Size) - Same Quality

Con: Less Popular, very little support be it computer players or physical music players.
 
(possibly) big con - you already lost a bunch of quality converting to mp3. Converting the mp3's to wma will lose even more quality.
 
unless you are worried about space, which hopefully you aren't squeezing for mp3's .. I see no reason to use wma over mp3 .. standardization is a good thing in my opinion ..
-neural
 
Be very affraid when using wma files. You may find that you get locked out of files that you converted from CDs that you own.

Microsoft Wma files and copy protection is bad for consumers. If you can, then avoid them like the plague.

ALL Mp3 players will play your Mp3s. But few play wma files. Drive space is cheap now days. And wma files sound worse than mp3 files (based upon the fact that every wma file that I have heard sounds like crap).

But if you still wonder, then convert some over to wma for yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top