mrSHEiK124
Lifer
i have a question, its rather related to the topic, but this thread has drifted into unrelated hell so who cares
for the most part, i buy my music (LEGALLY) from ****.com, and choose to have it encoded at 192 kbps AAC (sounds good enough to my ears, and i CAN tell the diff between 192 and 128) and when i rip my own previously purchased CDs, i use Apple Lossless. is there any bad part to this? i mean, if i need to move on to a different mp3 player/music software (highly doubt it, iTunes is awesome) i can take the Apple Lossless to MP3 easily, as for the AACs, there is always just either rebuying (its cheap enough) or converting from lossy to lossy (doubt i'll hear a difference anyways)
so, should i go for something like FLAC, and backup my lossless copies somewhere, and keep a lossy copy on hand for either my iPod (getting it soon) or just moving to WinAMP to listen to them
for the most part, i buy my music (LEGALLY) from ****.com, and choose to have it encoded at 192 kbps AAC (sounds good enough to my ears, and i CAN tell the diff between 192 and 128) and when i rip my own previously purchased CDs, i use Apple Lossless. is there any bad part to this? i mean, if i need to move on to a different mp3 player/music software (highly doubt it, iTunes is awesome) i can take the Apple Lossless to MP3 easily, as for the AACs, there is always just either rebuying (its cheap enough) or converting from lossy to lossy (doubt i'll hear a difference anyways)
so, should i go for something like FLAC, and backup my lossless copies somewhere, and keep a lossy copy on hand for either my iPod (getting it soon) or just moving to WinAMP to listen to them