- Sep 15, 2008
- 5,053
- 196
- 116
I think if firefox removed plugins support. It will loss browser race.
I think so too.
Edit: I think that the Flash Player hate, and Internet Explorer / Chrome envy, has gone way too far, if Firefox is thinking about killing off the plugin functionality that has been there since the Netscape Navigator days.
I think so too.
Edit: I think that the Flash Player hate, and Internet Explorer / Chrome envy, has gone way too far, if Firefox is thinking about killing off the plugin functionality that has been there since the Netscape Navigator days.
Instead of being special snowflakes, companies should use open standards. You don't need plugins with open standards.
The Web platform is powerful and can usually do everything that a plugin can do. In the rare cases where a site needs to extend Web technologies, the recommended solution is to develop the additional features as a Firefox add-on.
Instead of being special snowflakes, companies should use open standards. You don't need plugins with open standards.
This is just Mozilla eliminating competition, nothing else.
So does this strategy include extensions? Like ABP, FlashGot and Better Privacy?
I never really understood the difference between extensions and plugins.
So does this strategy include extensions? Like ABP, FlashGot and Better Privacy?
I never really understood the difference between extensions and plugins.
Addons != plugins. Addons are basically javascript and will still work sure fine. Plugins are things like Flash, pdfium, etc...I used mostly firefox addons. If Mozilla do this, i will quit