Originally posted by: Vic
How am I trolling? Oh, that's right, I'm not. I don't think you know what a troll is besides it's the best comeback you can come with.
And hey, how come YOU'RE not arguing on topic?
Because you rerailed the topic with your trolling and personal attacks.
- Apr 15, 2007
- 9,280
- 0
- 0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
So, posting a relevant news topic in the "Politics and News" section of a message board fits what part of that definition?
I can however, see how the poster claiming my "trolling" are in fact "trolling" themselves under the above definition considering they are not on the topic of the discussion and are primarily designed to disrupt its normal flow.
Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,422
- 14,337
- 136
It's derailed.
And seriously, STFU with your pathetic whining and apologizing. Neither you nor the OP can even pretend to back up his silly 'topic' and now you're just trying to pretend to yourself that playing the poor victim will win you brownie points. If it weren't for people making fun of the OP, this thread would not have gotten one single reply. If that doesn't tell you something, nothing will.
Yeah, I have no idea how comparing Obama to Mao in your thread title could possibly be controversial or inflammatory. You were either trolling, or your attempt at humor was embarrassingly sad.
Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,422
- 14,337
- 136
/facepalm
No one is this stupid. No one. If you managed to read beyond the opening line of that wiki post, then I can only conclude that you are either unabashed liars or consummate trolls yourselves, desperate trying to keep this ridiculous thread alive.
- Apr 15, 2007
- 9,280
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Vic
It's derailed.
And seriously, STFU with your pathetic whining and apologizing. Neither you nor the OP can even pretend to back up his silly 'topic' and now you're just trying to pretend to yourself that playing the poor victim will win you brownie points. If it weren't for people making fun of the OP, this thread would not have gotten one single reply. If that doesn't tell you something, nothing will.
Sure I can.
The U.N. has its agenda and the USA has its agenda. The agenda the U.N. may try and push may not be in the best interest of the Unites States. An example of this would is the (previously mentioned) push by the U.N. for a global currency. The president is elected to represent the best interest of the citizens of the United States not the best interest of the citizens of the world.
There are several other issues that may arise. Now, no where did I saw that participation in the U.N. is completely a bad thing but that is contingent on EXPERTS being involved. Has Obama spent his life becoming an expert on international relations? No, by his own admission he is a "community organizer". Let the international relations experts with experience deal with the international relations issues under the supervision of the US government.
Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,422
- 14,337
- 136
Because of course we all know there is nothing inflammatory about equating a political figure with Mao, Stalin, or Hitler, especially with such ludicrous premises... or about starting thread after thread after fucking endless thread that are similarly inflammatory and equally moronic in premise. Why, I can't see how anyone could possibly consider the OP to be a troll....
:roll:
Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,422
- 14,337
- 136
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: Vic
It's derailed.
And seriously, STFU with your pathetic whining and apologizing. Neither you nor the OP can even pretend to back up his silly 'topic' and now you're just trying to pretend to yourself that playing the poor victim will win you brownie points. If it weren't for people making fun of the OP, this thread would not have gotten one single reply. If that doesn't tell you something, nothing will.
Sure I can.
The U.N. has its agenda and the USA has its agenda. The agenda the U.N. may try and push may not be in the best interest of the Unites States. An example of this would is the (previously mentioned) push by the U.N. for a global currency. The president is elected to represent the best interest of the citizens of the United States not the best interest of the citizens of the world.
There are several other issues that may arise. Now, no where did I saw that participation in the U.N. is completely a bad thing but that is contingent on EXPERTS being involved. Has Obama spent his life becoming an expert on international relations? No, by his own admission he is a "community organizer". Let the international relations experts with experience deal with the international relations issues under the supervision of the US government.
And with the POTUS chairing the Security Council, and with the US still as the UN's primary source of funding, military backing, and aid to developing countries, what this means is that the US will now effectively control the UN. Its agenda will become our agenda. Any 'expert' could tell you that.
And that 'community organizer' - in addition to being POTUS - has a JD magna cum laude from Harvard, is a longtime leading member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and sat on the Committee on Foreign Relations while in the Senate. So by saying that he is not a international relations expert is for you - once again - to prove yourself an idiot troll.
BTW, you still haven't bothered to defend the Mao connection.
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Patranus
Originally posted by: Vic
It's derailed.
And seriously, STFU with your pathetic whining and apologizing. Neither you nor the OP can even pretend to back up his silly 'topic' and now you're just trying to pretend to yourself that playing the poor victim will win you brownie points. If it weren't for people making fun of the OP, this thread would not have gotten one single reply. If that doesn't tell you something, nothing will.
Sure I can.
The U.N. has its agenda and the USA has its agenda. The agenda the U.N. may try and push may not be in the best interest of the Unites States. An example of this would is the (previously mentioned) push by the U.N. for a global currency. The president is elected to represent the best interest of the citizens of the United States not the best interest of the citizens of the world.
There are several other issues that may arise. Now, no where did I saw that participation in the U.N. is completely a bad thing but that is contingent on EXPERTS being involved. Has Obama spent his life becoming an expert on international relations? No, by his own admission he is a "community organizer". Let the international relations experts with experience deal with the international relations issues under the supervision of the US government.
And with the POTUS chairing the Security Council, and with the US still as the UN's primary source of funding, military backing, and aid to developing countries, what this means is that the US will now effectively control the UN. Its agenda will become our agenda. Any 'expert' could tell you that.
And that 'community organizer' - in addition to being POTUS - has a JD magna cum laude from Harvard, is a longtime leading member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and sat on the Committee on Foreign Relations while in the Senate. So by saying that he is not a international relations expert is for you - once again - to prove yourself an idiot troll.
BTW, you still haven't bothered to defend the Mao connection.
you forgot law professor at one of the best universities in the world.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter