Moto X has extremely good sound quality

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
Listening to music right now, I'm literally hearing little details I've never heard before listening to music on my ipod touch or windows phone.

It might be distorted harmonics or something, but it's definitely unique than what I've heard before. Same earphones as I"ve always had.

Any other Moto X owners notice this?
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
454
126
What app are you using? I really like power amp for music quality, because the equalizer is fantastic if you have DVC enabled. Haven't found anything else that matches it, and I'm a picky SOB when it comes to mobile sound quality. I still carried a separate Cowon mp3 player for years when I had the iPhone because I can't stand Apples refusal to let me EQ my own music. It sounded terrible. Most Android players aren't much better... Except for power amp.
 

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
iPod touch is pretty good though. What kind of earphones are you using?

They're called "woodees". First result on amazon.

ipod touch has an almost zero hiss when at zero volume. No other player has this. However...it seems to me that the tradeoff for this is a little less detail in the sound.
 

gus6464

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2005
1,848
32
91
Not bad with my Custom One Pro. Overall I'm finding the Moto X to be an exceptional phone. Motorola connect and active display is just damn good.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
They're called "woodees". First result on amazon.

ipod touch has an almost zero hiss when at zero volume. No other player has this. However...it seems to me that the tradeoff for this is a little less detail in the sound.

The iPod Touch has a decent DAC, but of course, products from Cowan blow it out of the water.

Back when they were relevant/available at the same time, the Zune 30/80/120s (HDD-based) had a superior DAC to the iPods and iPhones as well. It sounded awesome. Not sure how the Zune HD's DAC compared to the iDevices during the time the HD was on sale - but I loved that player too.
The best thing Apple ever had with their devices, for the overall experience, was much better standby battery life. Early Zune models had miserable battery life on standby/sleep - they got much better, but still couldn't truly compete.


For the Moto X, not sure about the actual physical DAC and it's quality/comparison - but there is a software sound layer.
If you go into Settings > Sound > Audio Effects - you'll see options for the speaker and wired. I do not believe any of these settings impact Bluetooth, as I never noticed a difference. There is essentially a software EQ, and the default definitely seem to have a good overall sound. I haven't tried wired headphones on the default, but I appreciate the speaker.
 

TheStu

Moderator<br>Mobile Devices & Gadgets
Moderator
Sep 15, 2004
12,089
45
91
The iPod Touch has a decent DAC, but of course, products from Cowan blow it out of the water.

Back when they were relevant/available at the same time, the Zune 30/80/120s (HDD-based) had a superior DAC to the iPods and iPhones as well. It sounded awesome. Not sure how the Zune HD's DAC compared to the iDevices during the time the HD was on sale - but I loved that player too.
The best thing Apple ever had with their devices, for the overall experience, was much better standby battery life. Early Zune models had miserable battery life on standby/sleep - they got much better, but still couldn't truly compete.


For the Moto X, not sure about the actual physical DAC and it's quality/comparison - but there is a software sound layer.
If you go into Settings > Sound > Audio Effects - you'll see options for the speaker and wired. I do not believe any of these settings impact Bluetooth, as I never noticed a difference. There is essentially a software EQ, and the default definitely seem to have a good overall sound. I haven't tried wired headphones on the default, but I appreciate the speaker.

I always loved the industrial design of the ZuneHD, it's just a shame that even at the end, it was hard to find them for a decent price. They were never that much cheaper than an iPod Touch, and were lacking in features compared to them. I can't even remember if the ZuneHD had a browser on it.
 

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
I've found the sq of nokia devices to be not so bad.

TOo bad they don't have gapless playback.
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Can't wait for Chris to finish testing through the major products out now.

So far there's only S4, Note 3, Nexus 5 and iPhone 5. All pretty good, except the Nexus max volume is WAY TOO HIGH.
I found the Nexus 5 min volume in calls to be too high. It's probably the equivalent to 50% volume on my iPhone. There are times I don't want a phone call completely throwing me off from multitasking, especially if it's a conference call.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
I always loved the industrial design of the ZuneHD, it's just a shame that even at the end, it was hard to find them for a decent price. They were never that much cheaper than an iPod Touch, and were lacking in features compared to them. I can't even remember if the ZuneHD had a browser on it.

It did have a browser, but it was junk.

I didn't care about the price, and it could technically do less. I still consider the same idea nowadays: I want a smartphone, minus the phone, to serve as a music player. I was considering the Lumia 520 recently for that very purpose, because I've basically worn out my Zune HD. I've had it since launch, it got used heavy while in college. Actually, scratch that. It did get used heavily in college, but I had an HDD Zune for the majority of college. The Zune HD was released at the beginning of my senior year. Yeesh, I feel like I've had this thing for longer than 4 years. hmm. Either way, between heavy college use (walking around, waiting, buses, etc), driving (I ALWAYS listen to music off of it while driving, unless playing with my phone's musical abilities), or just passing time at night when out of town. It's been developing some serious skips, blank tracks, pops, etc... in a way that tells me at least a few blocks of flash memory are failing. :( Got a lot of use out of it, that's for sure.

I've been waiting for Microsoft, or at least a partner like Nokia or Samsung, or realize they can release a Windows Phone 8 device that simply doesn't have any cell modems, and call it a smart media player. Can't believe it's such a dead market - Microsoft could capitalize, at least a little, considering the Xbox Music service would still work for it. That's half of what truly kept me on the Zune platform for three devices (original ugly brown 30gb, then the 120gb (or was it 80?...), and then the HD), as the Zune Music Pass really was/is awesome. Technically still have it, since the desktop software and 10 credits still work every month - but so far, Microsoft definitely has room to improve/further develop the Xbox Music service/software. It looks nice on the Moto X and works real well, but it's really lacking. And it seems to truly get the best out of the whole Xbox Music multi-device relationship, I really have to abandon the desktop software and sort of tweak/tune/re-do my library on the Xbox Music software. Either the folder structure isn't working for the new app, or there is some incompatibility between Zune and Xbox Music DRM'd downloads.
Oh, and of course, there is zero "song credit" use in the new app. To keep getting 10 MP3 downloads every month, I will have to keep the desktop app. Ugh, forgot about those.

I'll get something working to smooth up my media syncing, because I think I can make some minor sacrifices and use only the Moto X for music instead of worrying about two devices. Plus, I can get auto play/start in my car with bluetooth - don't have to worry about plugging in aux cable or anything (power if on a long drive, though - I'll be getting a dock for that purpose).