Originally posted by: Deeko
I say offensive line, as a unit.
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Deeko
I say offensive line, as a unit.
I'd say it is the starting roster, as a unit...
Yes, a good O-line is critical to a teams success. Look at Denver's running game for proof. However, football is a team sport. To combine 4 positions and treat them as one in order to inflate their individual importance is folly.Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Deeko
I say offensive line, as a unit.
I'd say it is the starting roster, as a unit...
the offensive line should act as one unit, and having a solid o-line is completely critical...A mediocore QB/RB can be effective behind a great line, and a good QB/RB can be made ineffictive with a bad line.
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Yes, a good O-line is critical to a teams success. Look at Denver's running game for proof. However, football is a team sport. To combine 4 positions and treat them as one in order to inflate their individual importantance is folly.Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Deeko
I say offensive line, as a unit.
I'd say it is the starting roster, as a unit...
the offensive line should act as one unit, and having a solid o-line is completely critical...A mediocore QB/RB can be effective behind a great line, and a good QB/RB can be made ineffictive with a bad line.
My vote is for QB
In THAT case, the answer is... it depends.Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Yes, a good O-line is critical to a teams success. Look at Denver's running game for proof. However, football is a team sport. To combine 4 positions and treat them as one in order to inflate their individual importantance is folly.Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Deeko
I say offensive line, as a unit.
I'd say it is the starting roster, as a unit...
the offensive line should act as one unit, and having a solid o-line is completely critical...A mediocore QB/RB can be effective behind a great line, and a good QB/RB can be made ineffictive with a bad line.
My vote is for QB
Well, ok, maybe I should have phrased the question what FACTOR is most important to a team, and including coach, owner, stadium, as well.
If you are Indianapolis, it is Quarterback
Switch Eli for Peyton and Indy loses every game.Originally posted by: dragonballgtz
If you are Indianapolis, it is Quarterback
And the o-line. The QB rarely gets touched.
Maybe for the first season. The future remains to be seen.Originally posted by: Mwilding
Switch Eli for Peyton and Indy loses every game.Originally posted by: dragonballgtz
If you are Indianapolis, it is Quarterback
And the o-line. The QB rarely gets touched.
Originally posted by: Mwilding
In THAT case, the answer is... it depends.Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Yes, a good O-line is critical to a teams success. Look at Denver's running game for proof. However, football is a team sport. To combine 4 positions and treat them as one in order to inflate their individual importantance is folly.Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Deeko
I say offensive line, as a unit.
I'd say it is the starting roster, as a unit...
the offensive line should act as one unit, and having a solid o-line is completely critical...A mediocore QB/RB can be effective behind a great line, and a good QB/RB can be made ineffictive with a bad line.
My vote is for QB
Well, ok, maybe I should have phrased the question what FACTOR is most important to a team, and including coach, owner, stadium, as well.
If you are Baltimore, it is Linebacker. They won the superbowl without any offense.
If you are Indianapolis, it is Quarterback.
If you are Denver, is is O-Line all the way.
If you are New England, it is Coach.
If you are San Diego, it is Tight End...![]()
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Cheerleaders u fools! Who gets the old horny men into the stands!?
