HydroSqueegee
Golden Member
- Oct 27, 2005
- 1,709
- 2
- 71
Sounds like they didn't include Better Bodies or Better Heads, or some of the other Character beautification Mods - that's a bit odd if that's true.
.
Of course. DX10 and DX11 allow for things that couldn't be done before, but more in terms of efficiency and precision than whether or not you can make a good looking scene. There's a fair chance that Starcraft II might be able to be less of a CPU hog at a given FPS, were it DX11, instead of DX9, FI (or, maybe not--I don't know Blizzard's secret sauce--but it's plausible).
It proves that all this DX10 and DX11 stuff is a red herring. The technological gimmicks aren't what make a game look good.
Hmm?So how come every new generation just saps performance and doesn't provide any visual benefits?
So how come every new generation just saps performance and doesn't provide any visual benefits?
Completely separate, these people supposedly asked all of the original authors for permission.Is this different than the Morrowind 2011 mod pack that came out in January? It got shut down because mod creators complained about their mods being included without their permission.
There were marked benefits up to DX9 for sure. DX10 did next to nothing however, and DX11 in it's current iteration is rather useless too, as both games and hardware aren't properly built for it.Go and google some comparisons. You'll see that the are obviously benefits to each new version. Stop whining about it and shaddap already.
One thing I'm curious about: if you need to install Tribunal for this, won't you have to deal with the assassins and side trip to deal with them right away?
It's been years, but I thought they will show up a game day or two after the expansion is installed.
Completely separate, these people supposedly asked all of the original authors for permission.
There were marked benefits up to DX9 for sure. DX10 did next to nothing however, and DX11 in it's current iteration is rather useless too, as both games and hardware aren't properly built for it.
Markbnj what cpu are running? Also what res? Just curious how my rig would handle it.
I'm sorry to break it to you, but you are actually the one that has no idea what they are talking about. You are just gullible enough to be shown a few marketing screenshots and take them as unaltered fact. The truth is, DX10 did next to nothing to improve graphics, and all of those comparison screenshots were made by nerfing the DX9 renderer to make DX10 look good by comparison (or by simply fabricating the DX10 shots completely). Just look at Crysis, it locked out the very high settings if you were running on DX9, but simply changing a couple .CFG files allowed all of those "DX10 Only" features to be played on everyone's DX9 graphics cards.You don't know what you're talking about. Are you just pissed because you bought a DX9 card right before DX10 came out? The differences are obvious.
DX9 vs DX10
Hope this question isn't too much of a thread derailment. If I didn't care too much for Oblivion (the exploration/graphics kept it interesting for a bit, but I gradually got bored of it), is it likely that I'll feel the same way about Morrowind? From what I've read, it seems that if the games had identical graphics, that Morrowind, as a game, is generally considered better?
