Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
Proof is in the pudding that high payroll gives teams a definite edge on chances of making the playoffs. What happens during the playoffs, however, is a flip of the coin.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
proof is in the pudding that you cannot pay for performance. now you can stop playing that card.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Proof is in the pudding that high payroll gives teams a definite edge on chances of making the playoffs. What happens during the playoffs, however, is a flip of the coin.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
proof is in the pudding that you cannot pay for performance. now you can stop playing that card.
Wrong, list all of the teams that made the playoffs for the past 10 years, and I guarantee you that a very high % (at least 2/3 to 3/4) would be in the top tier of spending in their league that year. This year: Mets (1), Cards(7), Pads (9), Dodgers (2), Yankees (1), A's (11), Twins (10), Tigers (6) - that's at least 5/8 teams in the top 7, and this is a rare year (usually you will see most teams in the top 5).Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Proof is in the pudding that high payroll gives teams a definite edge on chances of making the playoffs. What happens during the playoffs, however, is a flip of the coin.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
proof is in the pudding that you cannot pay for performance. now you can stop playing that card.
if this is true small cap teams would never make the playoffs and they do. And large cap teams frequently miss the playoffs. face it paying a mediocre player 20 mil a year won't make him a better player.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Wrong, list all of the teams that made the playoffs for the past 10 years, and I guarantee you that a very high % (at least 2/3 to 3/4) would be in the top tier of spending in their league that year. This year: Mets (1), Cards(7), Pads (9), Dodgers (2), Yankees (1), A's (11), Twins (10), Tigers (6)Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Proof is in the pudding that high payroll gives teams a definite edge on chances of making the playoffs. What happens during the playoffs, however, is a flip of the coin.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
proof is in the pudding that you cannot pay for performance. now you can stop playing that card.
if this is true small cap teams would never make the playoffs and they do. And large cap teams frequently miss the playoffs. face it paying a mediocre player 20 mil a year won't make him a better player.
And this was actually way more diverse than a typical year. The only team that consistently, over the past 10 years, buck the $$ playoff trend is the A's. They are the exception, $$$ gets you the best players unless you're Billy Beane.
Originally posted by: Don Rodriguez
Without Jeter - Yanks make the playoffs
Without Morenau - Twins don't even THINK about the playoffs.
If you do what I said and look up all the playoff teams by payroll for the past 10 years you would have your proof, I've already done it in other threads. You know what I'm saying is true so stop ducking the fact that high payroll, especially in the case of the Yankees, all but guarantees them a playoff spot.. How they decide to choke once they get there is up to them.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Wrong, list all of the teams that made the playoffs for the past 10 years, and I guarantee you that a very high % (at least 2/3 to 3/4) would be in the top tier of spending in their league that year. This year: Mets (1), Cards(7), Pads (9), Dodgers (2), Yankees (1), A's (11), Twins (10), Tigers (6)Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Proof is in the pudding that high payroll gives teams a definite edge on chances of making the playoffs. What happens during the playoffs, however, is a flip of the coin.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
proof is in the pudding that you cannot pay for performance. now you can stop playing that card.
if this is true small cap teams would never make the playoffs and they do. And large cap teams frequently miss the playoffs. face it paying a mediocre player 20 mil a year won't make him a better player.
And this was actually way more diverse than a typical year. The only team that consistently, over the past 10 years, buck the $$ playoff trend is the A's. They are the exception, $$$ gets you the best players unless you're Billy Beane.
past performance never guarantees future performance.
we can go tit for tat all day. but in the end its many more factors than salary alone that determines a players and a teams performance.
perhaps there are too many teams to begin with.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If you do what I said and look up all the playoff teams by payroll for the past 10 years you would have your proof, I've already done it in other threads. You know what I'm saying is true so stop ducking the fact that high payroll, especially in the case of the Yankees, all but guarantees them a playoff spot.. How they decide to choke once they get there is up to them.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Wrong, list all of the teams that made the playoffs for the past 10 years, and I guarantee you that a very high % (at least 2/3 to 3/4) would be in the top tier of spending in their league that year. This year: Mets (1), Cards(7), Pads (9), Dodgers (2), Yankees (1), A's (11), Twins (10), Tigers (6)Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Proof is in the pudding that high payroll gives teams a definite edge on chances of making the playoffs. What happens during the playoffs, however, is a flip of the coin.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
proof is in the pudding that you cannot pay for performance. now you can stop playing that card.
if this is true small cap teams would never make the playoffs and they do. And large cap teams frequently miss the playoffs. face it paying a mediocre player 20 mil a year won't make him a better player.
And this was actually way more diverse than a typical year. The only team that consistently, over the past 10 years, buck the $$ playoff trend is the A's. They are the exception, $$$ gets you the best players unless you're Billy Beane.
past performance never guarantees future performance.
we can go tit for tat all day. but in the end its many more factors than salary alone that determines a players and a teams performance.
perhaps there are too many teams to begin with.![]()
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
If you do what I said and look up all the playoff teams by payroll for the past 10 years you would have your proof, I've already done it in other threads. You know what I'm saying is true so stop ducking the fact that high payroll, especially in the case of the Yankees, all but guarantees them a playoff spot.. How they decide to choke once they get there is up to them.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Wrong, list all of the teams that made the playoffs for the past 10 years, and I guarantee you that a very high % (at least 2/3 to 3/4) would be in the top tier of spending in their league that year. This year: Mets (1), Cards(7), Pads (9), Dodgers (2), Yankees (1), A's (11), Twins (10), Tigers (6)Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Proof is in the pudding that high payroll gives teams a definite edge on chances of making the playoffs. What happens during the playoffs, however, is a flip of the coin.Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Nobody should have to "hold a team together" with players getting money of the magnitude that NYY players get.Originally posted by: Slick5150
I'm no Yankees fan, but Jeter deserved it. He held that team together, while playing outstanding baseball himself.
proof is in the pudding that you cannot pay for performance. now you can stop playing that card.
if this is true small cap teams would never make the playoffs and they do. And large cap teams frequently miss the playoffs. face it paying a mediocre player 20 mil a year won't make him a better player.
And this was actually way more diverse than a typical year. The only team that consistently, over the past 10 years, buck the $$ playoff trend is the A's. They are the exception, $$$ gets you the best players unless you're Billy Beane.
past performance never guarantees future performance.
we can go tit for tat all day. but in the end its many more factors than salary alone that determines a players and a teams performance.
perhaps there are too many teams to begin with.![]()
Heh, they gave it to the wrong Twin! Actually I'm surprised that the vote didn't split between the two Twins and the award go to Jeter. The fact that Mauer finished a distant 6th is a joke.Originally posted by: jman19
I don't really care that Jeter didn't win the MVP, but Morneau wasn't even the best player on his team.
