Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: SaltBoy
Morgan Freeman is one of the actors that I most respect, and it has NOTHING to do with his color of skin. Amen to everything he says, and amen to you, NFS4! 🙂
he certainly seems to be one of the few actors who has a brain and uses it.
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
You are missing the point. What he's saying is that every time you describe someone as black or white, or whatever, you are using their race to describe them. That, by definition, is racist.
Only black person you read about in history was MLK? Try re-reading the book.
I got his point and I stated why I disagreed. You haven't addressed my point. Racism is a real thing with real effects. Ignoring it doesn't make it go away. That hasn't worked for any problem ever, and won't work now. A real world problem won't get fixed by a utopian solution.
As for the rest, first you re-read my two paragraphs and then i'll re-read a book.
Edited for nested quotes
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: NFS4
Someone give this man another Oscar! 😛
http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php...rgan_freeman_condems_black_history_mon"You're going to relegate my history to a month,?" Freeman asks Wallace in their discussion of black history month. After noting there is no "white history month," he says, "I don't want a black history month. Black history is American history."
The notion of a special month for black history may be hurting rather than helping efforts for racial equality, believes Freeman. When Wallace wonders that without black history month, racism may be harder to stop and asks, "How are we going to get rid of racism?" Freeman retorts, "Stop talking about it!"
Freeman believes the labels "black" and "white" are an obstacle to beating racism. "I am going to stop calling you a white man and I'm going to ask you to stop calling me a black man," he says. "I know you as Mike Wallace. You know me as Morgan Freeman. You wouldn't say, 'Well, I know this white guy named Mike Wallace.' You know what I'm saying?" Freeman asks Wallace.
Next we'll totally end murders and terrorism and sexism by not talking about them. Even though you aren't a terrorist or a murder or a sexist and neither am I, if we both agree not to acknowledge that those things exist we can totally defeat them. This goes back to the life lessons we learned in elementary school that when you ignore negative things, they just vanish into thin air.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
i don't think he intended his point to be construed as "ignoring" racism. i think that his point is that as a society, we should mature from it and move past it. and i agree BTW.
No. See my post above yours. He meant to stop talking about RACE. Not to stop talking about racism. If the problem does not exist you will not talk about it, will you?But Freeman was asked a real world question of, "How are we going to get rid of racism?" His solution of "not talking about it" is in effect ignoring it. That won't work.
As a society we should move forward to a place where race doesn't matter.
do you read what you quote?Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: meltdown75
i don't think he intended his point to be construed as "ignoring" racism. i think that his point is that as a society, we should mature from it and move past it. and i agree BTW.
As a society we should have never separated people by race in the first place. As a society we should move forward to a place where race doesn't matter. All these theoretical things can be pretty much universally agreed on.
But Freeman was asked a real world question of, "How are we going to get rid of racism?" His solution of "not talking about it" is in effect ignoring it. That won't work.
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Originally posted by: yowolabi
I got his point and I stated why I disagreed. You haven't addressed my point. Racism is a real thing with real effects. Ignoring it doesn't make it go away. That hasn't worked for any problem ever, and won't work now. A real world problem won't get fixed by a utopian solution.
As for the rest, first you re-read my two paragraphs and then i'll re-read a book.
Edited for nested quotes
See, Morgan Freeman is saying that by having a single black history month - and separating it from 'white history' - it's just exacerbating the problem. I agree.. there's no point to 'black history month.'
There's NO need to be separating black history from white history.. Why the hell can't Morgan Freeman, in this day and age, just be a man.. and not always specifically a black man?
Getting rid of black history month is NOT ignoring racism... That notion is as ridiculous as calling me racist for saying "The suspect was a black man, about 6' 2", and maybe 200lbs."
... or, you could try to read into my post even further, squeeze it like a sponge, and call me racist because the first example statement I could think of for describing ones' appearance was as a suspect..
He's not saying to ignore racism, he's saying when you point out race, you are racist. So ignore race, not ignore racism. He clarifies his "don't talk about it" statement in his next quote. "Freeman believes the labels "black" and "white" are an obstacle to beating racism."Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
You are missing the point. What he's saying is that every time you describe someone as black or white, or whatever, you are using their race to describe them. That, by definition, is racist.
Only black person you read about in history was MLK? Try re-reading the book.
I got his point and I stated why I disagreed. You haven't addressed my point. Racism is a real thing with real effects. Ignoring it doesn't make it go away. That hasn't worked for any problem ever, and won't work now. A real world problem won't get fixed by a utopian solution.
As for the rest, first you re-read my two paragraphs and then i'll re-read a book.
Edited for nested quotes
Originally posted by: Plasdom
yowolabi, that is what I though he meant when I read the quotes online and I also disagreed. However, after watching the segment on TV, I believe what he meant was that we should stop talking about race and not racism. He continued that quote by telling the guy who was interviewing him that he will stop calling him a white guy or a jew and he should also not call Morgan a black guy. He even made reference to the fact that some people talk about having "white/jews/black" friends and thought it was very ridiculous. So I do believe that he was saying that we should stop talking about race in our relations with others and in that manner which tends to make a peron be defined by his race as opposed to just being a mere characteristic of the person
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
He's not saying to ignore racism, he's saying when you point out race, you are racist. So ignore race, not ignore racism. He clarifies his "don't talk about it" statement in his next quote. "Freeman believes the labels "black" and "white" are an obstacle to beating racism."Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: Phoenix86
You are missing the point. What he's saying is that every time you describe someone as black or white, or whatever, you are using their race to describe them. That, by definition, is racist.
Only black person you read about in history was MLK? Try re-reading the book.
I got his point and I stated why I disagreed. You haven't addressed my point. Racism is a real thing with real effects. Ignoring it doesn't make it go away. That hasn't worked for any problem ever, and won't work now. A real world problem won't get fixed by a utopian solution.
As for the rest, first you re-read my two paragraphs and then i'll re-read a book.
Edited for nested quotes
Black history month is racist. Why? Because it's limited to only black people. By definition, that's racist. He's saying you can't fight racism with racism, so don't. That's what you are missing.
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
WTG Morgan, someone using their brain for once. 😎
Originally posted by: squirrel dog
He is a smart man with a great voice . Plus he likes boats.
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Fvck yeah, that is what I am talking about. Freeman knows what is up.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Freeman for president.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Freeman for president.
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Freeman for president.
I concur :beer:
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Freeman for president.
I concur :beer:
Wasn't he the president in Deep Impact? 😀