more proof that DeLay and Abramhoff were in bed together

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
This is about as surprising as the sun rising or setting each day. I'm very sure that Pabster, GenX, Zendari and the rest will be chiming in condemning the administration and other Republicans for stonewalling the investigation into this by the McCain committee looking into it all. But then again, if they don't, they just might be shown to be giving out favors for campaign money. Isn't that illegal?

Click here for full article">Full Story...click here</a>

AP: DeLay's Staff Tried to Help Abramoff

By JOHN SOLOMON and SHARON THEIMER
Associated Press Writers


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Rep. Tom DeLay's staff tried to help lobbyist Jack Abramoff win access to Interior Secretary Gale Norton, an effort that succeeded after Abramoff's Indian tribe clients began funneling a quarter-million dollars to an environmental group founded by Norton.

"Do you think you could call that friend and set up a meeting," then-DeLay staffer Tony Rudy wrote to fellow House aide Thomas Pyle in a Dec. 29, 2000, e-mail titled "Gale Norton-Interior Secretary." President Bush had nominated Norton to the post the day before.

Rudy wrote Abramoff that same day promising he had "good news" about securing a meeting with Norton, forwarding information about the environmental group Norton had founded, according to e-mails obtained by investigators and reviewed by The Associated Press. Rudy's message to Abramoff was sent from Congress' official e-mail system.

Within months, Abramoff clients donated heavily to the Norton-founded group and the lobbyist and one of the tribes he represented won face-to-face time with the secretary during a Sept. 24, 2001, dinner sponsored by the group she had founded.

Abramoff's clients were trying to stop a rival Indian tribe from winning Interior Department approval to build a casino.

DeLay, who has temporarily stepped aside as House majority leader because of criminal charges in Texas, eventually signed a letter with other GOP House leaders to Norton on behalf of Abramoff's clients, records show.

Federal and congressional investigators obtained the DeLay staff e-mails from Abramoff's former lobbying firm as they try to determine whether officials in Congress or the Bush administration provided government assistance in exchange for the vast amounts of money Abramoff's clients donated to Republican causes.

The e-mails, however, weren't provided to Senate Indian Affairs Committee Chairman Sen. John McCain, whose committee held hearings Wednesday into Abramoff's dealings at the Interior department. It has drawn attention, however, among other government investigators examining whether any federal actions were taken in exchange for donations.


The assistance to Abramoff from DeLay's staff occurred just a few months after DeLay received political donations, free use of a skybox to reward donors and an all-expense paid trip to play golf in Scotland arranged by Abramoff and mostly underwritten by his clients.

DeLay's lawyer said this week his client likely didn't know about the assistance his aides gave Abramoff five years ago and does not believe his office would ever provide government assistance in exchange for political donations.

"On its face it's not unusual for staffers to assist people trying to get a meeting with an executive branch agency and that would be something a member of Congress would not typically be involved with. That's staff work," attorney Richard Cullen said in an interview.

"Tom DeLay conducts himself consistent with the highest standards of conduct and he mandated the same for his staff," Cullen said.

Shortly after the e-mail exchanges, the two DeLay aides, Rudy and Pyle, left DeLay's office for private sector jobs. Rudy went to work for Abramoff while Pyle went to work for the Koch pipeline company, Neither returned calls to their offices this week seeking comment.

The December 2000 e-mails show DeLay's office identified - as an avenue for winning a meeting with the new interior secretary - Norton's former political fundraiser, Italia Federici, and a conservative environmental group called the Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy (CREA).

Norton founded the group in 1999 with Federici and conservative activist Grover Norquist, a close ally of President Bush. When Norton was named interior secretary by Bush, Federici took over as president of CREA.

Pyle reported to Rudy that he was trying to reach a contact close to Norton and that Federici might be helpful. "Yes, I spoke to her yesterday and she is scrambling right now to get in touch with Gale. Italia helped co-found CREA with Gale and worked on her Senate campaign," Pyle wrote.

Rudy gave an update to Abramoff, forwarding Pyle's information to the lobbyist and suggesting Norquist might provide another avenue to help secure a meeting with the interior secretary.

"Good news. I think she (Norton) knows Grover," Rudy wrote in an e-mail from his official congressional account to Abramoff.

Federici helped Norton raise money for an unsuccessful bid for a Senate seat in Colorado and she, Norquist and Norton formed CREA in 1999 as a tax-exempt organization highlighting Republican ideas for the environment.

Within a few months of the e-mail exchange, Abramoff's Indian tribal clients began sending more than a quarter-million dollars to CREA.

Abramoff sent an e-mail to one of the tribes, the Coushattas, suggesting Interior officials wanted the donations to go to Norton's group. "I met with the Interior guys today and they were ecstatic that the tribe was going to help. If you can get me a check via federal made out to `Council for Republican Environmental Advocacy' for $50K that would be great," Abramoff wrote in one e-mail made public by McCain's investigation.

The tribe obliged. And a short while later, Federici left a message with Norton's office seeking a meeting for that tribe's leaders, according to evidence gathered by investigators. That meeting in April 2001 was rejected by Norton's staff, Interior officials told AP.

Coushatta tribal counsel Jimmy Faircloth told AP that Abramoff instructed the tribe to give donations to CREA of $50,000 in March 2001 and $100,000 in March 2002 "for the purpose of building a lobbying presence in Washington."

The tribe eventually scored face-to-face time with Norton and her top deputy, Steven Griles, on Sept. 24, 2001 at a private fundraising dinner arranged by CREA. Tribal chairman Lovelin Poncho and Abramoff sat at Norton's table while tribal attorney Kathy Van Hoof sat with Griles, Fairchild said.

The Coushattas weren't alone in donating to CREA. Federal investigators have tracked more than a quarter-million dollars in tribal money to the group, including donations from the Saginaw Chippewa tribe of Michigan and the Tiguas of Texas.

At the time, Abramoff's tribal clients were trying to get Interior to reject efforts by rival tribes to get into the casino business. Interior rejected or delayed some of the rivals' bids for extended period of times, although they were recently approved.

Interior spokesman Dan DuBray confirmed that Norton met with the tribal leaders at the CREA dinner, but said he could not comment about any conversations because the matter is under investigation.

Federici attorney Michael Scheininger did not respond to an AP request for comment.

The Gun Lake tribe of Pottawatomi, one of the rivals of Abramoff's tribal clients, said Tuesday that it believed Abramoff's lobbying stalled Interior's approval of its casino by at least 14 months.

"The more we learn about the allegedly corrupt relationship between Jack Abramoff and a key high-ranking government official, the clearer it becomes that a full investigation should be conducted," said Gun Lake Tribal Chairman D.K. Sprague.

Edit: Added the rest of the article because of the damning information about how the representatives of our country (Left and Right) seem to whore themselves for campaign donations. It shows how the small groups of people keep innertwined to keep scratching each other's backs, fronts and sides. It is a veritable "I know someone that can help you get what you need, but you have to do something for me now and then later do something for them" circlejerk.
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
By the time they dig through everything, I'll be suprised if some 50 people aren't up for big time long term charges.

Tommy can't have bought off everyone in the country, and the 'Good-Old'Boy' network must have some holes in it.

Right now DeLay's betting that enough favors are owed that he can call in his chips and skate, but it might backfire.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
"Did we win it?" Scanlon wrote in an email.

"The [expletive] troglodytes didn't vote on you today," Abramoff responded.

"What's a troglodyte?" Scanlon asked.

"It's a lower form of existence, basically," Abramoff wrote. "They are plain stupid... Morons. These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure."

In another e-mail message he wrote, "we need to get some $ from those monkeys!!!! Can you smell money?!?!?!"
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4994
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: dahunan
"Did we win it?" Scanlon wrote in an email.

"The [expletive] troglodytes didn't vote on you today," Abramoff responded.

"What's a troglodyte?" Scanlon asked.

"It's a lower form of existence, basically," Abramoff wrote. "They are plain stupid... Morons. These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure."

In another e-mail message he wrote, "we need to get some $ from those monkeys!!!! Can you smell money?!?!?!"
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4994
these people have no common sense to be writing such trash in an email.

 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Right now they're busy finding a "judge we like, who we think has the appropriate qualifications..." :eek:
And the American people snore on.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: dahunan
"Did we win it?" Scanlon wrote in an email.

"The [expletive] troglodytes didn't vote on you today," Abramoff responded.

"What's a troglodyte?" Scanlon asked.

"It's a lower form of existence, basically," Abramoff wrote. "They are plain stupid... Morons. These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure."

In another e-mail message he wrote, "we need to get some $ from those monkeys!!!! Can you smell money?!?!?!"
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4994

We see this daily from liberals yapping about red states so what is new?

 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dahunan
"Did we win it?" Scanlon wrote in an email.

"The [expletive] troglodytes didn't vote on you today," Abramoff responded.

"What's a troglodyte?" Scanlon asked.

"It's a lower form of existence, basically," Abramoff wrote. "They are plain stupid... Morons. These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure."

In another e-mail message he wrote, "we need to get some $ from those monkeys!!!! Can you smell money?!?!?!"
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4994

We see this daily from liberals yapping about red states so what is new?

How much influence do those libs have?

Are they buddies and partners with the leader of the GOP?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dahunan
"Did we win it?" Scanlon wrote in an email.

"The [expletive] troglodytes didn't vote on you today," Abramoff responded.

"What's a troglodyte?" Scanlon asked.

"It's a lower form of existence, basically," Abramoff wrote. "They are plain stupid... Morons. These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure."

In another e-mail message he wrote, "we need to get some $ from those monkeys!!!! Can you smell money?!?!?!"
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4994

We see this daily from liberals yapping about red states so what is new?

How much influence do those libs have?

Are they buddies and partners with the leader of the GOP?

Does influence directly relate to the amount of idiocy one can spew? So lets say somebody like you who have zero influence in the world. Does it give you complete freedom to spew crap?
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dahunan
"Did we win it?" Scanlon wrote in an email.

"The [expletive] troglodytes didn't vote on you today," Abramoff responded.

"What's a troglodyte?" Scanlon asked.

"It's a lower form of existence, basically," Abramoff wrote. "They are plain stupid... Morons. These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure."

In another e-mail message he wrote, "we need to get some $ from those monkeys!!!! Can you smell money?!?!?!"
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4994

We see this daily from liberals yapping about red states so what is new?

How much influence do those libs have?

Are they buddies and partners with the leader of the GOP?

Does influence directly relate to the amount of idiocy one can spew? So lets say somebody like you who have zero influence in the world. Does it give you complete freedom to spew crap?

I was commenting on who his partners were... and who liked him and liked doing business with him ;)
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
I've heard of jury nullification, but Judge Nullification ?

how deep did the worm violate the core ?

<CLIP>

Schraub asked Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson to name a judge to preside over DeLay's trial.
Jefferson selected semi-retired Senior Judge Pat Priest of San Antonio, a Democrat.

Earle, however, filed a motion requesting Jefferson be removed from the case moments after Jefferson's office distributed a letter naming Priest to the job.
The validity of Priest's assignment by Jefferson was not immediately clear.

State documents examined by The Associated Press show that Jefferson's 2002 campaign treasurer, Bill Ceverha, also was the treasurer of DeLay's
Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action Committee.
The PAC is a codefendant in DeLay's case. Ceverha was a defendant this spring in a civil trial brought by Democrats
who lost state legislative races to Republicans in 2002.

Jefferson also was elected to his seat with the help of a $25,000 donation from the Republican National State Elections Committee,
a group at the heart of the money laundering charge against DeLay.
And he received $2,000 from a DeLay-run PAC whose executive director is a co-defendant.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
more proof that DeLay and Abramhoff were in bed together
I can't tell you how pleased I was that you didn't post any pics. eeewwwwhhh!
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Whew, CaptnKirk, that was mighty fast, wasn't it?

Earle must feel like he's playing basketball against the Harlem Globetrotters- just when you think you might be doing OK, zip! zap! swish! nothin' but net, and you never even saw the ball...

Perkins gets disqualified over a few thousand to Kerry and MoveOn, and the guy who gets to pick the judge took money from DeLay's PAC.... and big money from the arm of the RNC that allegedly did the laundering... WTF was Duncan, the guy who removed Perkins, thinking? That moving the decision further up the Repub foodchain would somehow arrive at a more impartial judge?

Priest may turn out to be OK, hard to tell just yet, but this doesn't really smell right, at all, if you know what I mean...

 

wirelessenabled

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2001
2,191
41
91
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
By the time they dig through everything, I'll be suprised if some 50 people aren't up for big time long term charges.

Tommy can't have bought off everyone in the country, and the 'Good-Old'Boy' network must have some holes in it.

Right now DeLay's betting that enough favors are owed that he can call in his chips and skate, but it might backfire.


:shocked:
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
Originally posted by: wirelessenabled
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
By the time they dig through everything, I'll be suprised if some 50 people aren't up for big time long term charges.

Tommy can't have bought off everyone in the country, and the 'Good-Old'Boy' network must have some holes in it.

Right now DeLay's betting that enough favors are owed that he can call in his chips and skate, but it might backfire.
:shocked:


The depth of Judicial Politics
<CLIP-WashPost>

JUDGES AND POLITICS aren't a good mix; partisan election of judges is a bad system. More proof of that arrived this week with the parade of judges who bounced through -- or were bounced from -- the criminal case against former House majority leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) over alleged violations of campaign finance law.

The judicial Tilt-a-Whirl started when Mr. DeLay's lawyers sought the removal of the judge assigned to hear the case. District Judge Bob Perkins donated more than $5,000 to Democratic causes in the past four years, including to MoveOn.org, which has helped lead the campaign against Mr. DeLay. Judge Perkins declined to step aside, but a retired judge brought in to decide the matter ruled -- correctly in our view -- that he should be replaced. Given the political volatility of the DeLay indictment and his contention that the case against him is a political vendetta by a Democratic prosecutor, it's important that the judge overseeing the case be as free as possible of any political taint.


But it didn't stop there. The Democratic prosecutor then challenged the Republican judge who had removed Judge Perkins, saying he shouldn't name Judge Perkins's replacement. The Republican judge kicked the matter upstairs, to the state's chief justice, whose Republican ties -- and particular connections to Mr. DeLay -- were even more numerous. Just before the Democratic prosecutor tried to boot him from assigning the case, the chief justice gave it to a retired judge who, though a Democrat, appears acceptable to Mr. DeLay's lawyers.

This is the unavoidable result of a partisan election system that drags judges into the political thicket. Most states have some form of an elected judiciary, but the Texas system is particularly bad: All judges are selected through partisan elections. As then-Chief Justice Tom Phillips, a Republican, said in 2003, "Our partisan, high-dollar judicial selection system has diminished public confidence in our courts, damaged our reputation throughout the country and around the world, and discouraged able lawyers from pursuing a judicial career." The dispute over who will hear the DeLay case is a symptom of a larger problem.


Investigation Takes Another Fork in the Road

And on the other hand, Tom gets another Democrat - Priest's in !



Let the games begin.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Oh, yeh, I just picked up this liitle bit of insight about how Scanlon, Abramoff's partner, DeLay's former aide, really feels about his fundie "friends"-

""The wackos get their information through the Christian right, Christian radio, mail, the internet and telephone trees," Scanlon wrote in the memo, which was read into the public record at a hearing of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. "Simply put, we want to bring out the wackos to vote against something and make sure the rest of the public lets the whole thing slip past them."

From here, and apparently in the public record, as well-

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/11/3/224529/687

I doubt that Reed, Dobson or any of their other leaders & idols feel any differently- how's it feel to be used, abused & discarded by scum? A little tawdry, perhaps?


 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dahunan
"Did we win it?" Scanlon wrote in an email.

"The [expletive] troglodytes didn't vote on you today," Abramoff responded.

"What's a troglodyte?" Scanlon asked.

"It's a lower form of existence, basically," Abramoff wrote. "They are plain stupid... Morons. These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure."

In another e-mail message he wrote, "we need to get some $ from those monkeys!!!! Can you smell money?!?!?!"
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4994

We see this daily from liberals yapping about red states so what is new?

How much influence do those libs have?

Are they buddies and partners with the leader of the GOP?

Does influence directly relate to the amount of idiocy one can spew? So lets say somebody like you who have zero influence in the world. Does it give you complete freedom to spew crap?

You're arguing that a crooked administration is A-OK because there are other crooks in the World. Great. Got that.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
CNMI: Fitial Will Cooperate With Feds In DeLay Probe
http://www.pacificislands.cc/pina/pinadefault2.php?urlpinaid=18756
The Marianas Variety Online reports that Governor-elect Benigno R. Fitial says he will cooperate with federal authorities in the ongoing investigation of Rep. Tom Delay and former Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff, whom he once described as his ?close friends.?

House leadership spokesman Charles P. Reyes Jr. said Speaker Fitial ?will comply with all the legal requirements asked of him.?

But Reyes said it?s unfair that Fitial?s name is always being associated with Delay, R-Texas, and Abramoff. In April, when news about DeLay?s and Abramoff?s possible ethical violations broke, Fitial issued a statement in their defense.

?I join Congressman DeLay in condemning this unfair criticism, which has even gone to the extent of attacking the Northern Marianas for its efforts to rightfully defend itself against hostile federal takeover attempts orchestrated by partisan political groups and other liberal special interest groups,? said Fitial in a statement issued on April 20, according to the Marianas Variety Online.

Back then, Fitial said certain left-leaning parties hostile to the local garment industry are ?attempting to undermine? his 2005 gubernatorial bid by linking him to the controversy surrounding DeLay and Abramoff, whom Fitial credited as the individuals who ?successfully thwarted repeated federal takeover attempts against the CNMI.?

The Marianas Variety Online reports that supporters of Fitial?s Republican opponent in the election, Gov. Juan N. Babauta, tried to make an issue out of the speaker?s links with DeLay and Abramoff, but it never caught on.

According to the Associated Press, DeLay and two GOP fundraisers, John Colyandro and Jim Ellis, are accused of illegally funneling $190,000 in corporate donations to 2002 Republican candidates for the Texas Legislature.

Under Texas law, corporate money cannot be directly used for political campaigns, but it can be used for administrative purposes.

On Monday a Texas judge threw out a conspiracy charge against DeLay but allowed money laundering charges to stand.

In a separate news article, the AP reported that the 2001 donations to Burns, a Montana Republican, included money directly from Abramoff and Northern Marianas garment magnate Willie Tan?s company, Tan Holdings Corp.

In that same article, Eloy Inos, a corporate executive of Tan Holdings, was mentioned as donating $5,000 to Burns? political action committee. Inos now serves on Fitial?s transition committee.

Fitial, a former executive of Tan?s, became speaker of the 12th Legislature largely through the help of DeLay?s aides. But Reyes said if Fitial was given help it was ?not surprising? since at that time he was still with the local GOP.

The Marianas Variety Online reports that, in a separate interview, Press Secretary Peter Callaghan said the CNMI Attorney General?s Office has provided federal authorities with all the documents they needed regarding the CNMI?s previous transactions with Abramoff.
Good things come to those who wait.

Guess that means we're all in for a treat some day when Abramoff, DeLay, et al get their due.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Guess that all means we're all in for a treat someday when Abramoff, Delay, et al get their due?

Its a maybe at best-----there is many a slip between cup and lip.

The smart money is always on corruption-----what else better describes our political campaign finance system?
 

Todd33

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2003
7,842
2
81
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: dahunan
"Did we win it?" Scanlon wrote in an email.

"The [expletive] troglodytes didn't vote on you today," Abramoff responded.

"What's a troglodyte?" Scanlon asked.

"It's a lower form of existence, basically," Abramoff wrote. "They are plain stupid... Morons. These mofos are the stupidest idiots in the land for sure."

In another e-mail message he wrote, "we need to get some $ from those monkeys!!!! Can you smell money?!?!?!"
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4994

We see this daily from liberals yapping about red states so what is new?

You know this type of response is against the new forum rules? Any thread jacking or OT response is against the rules, so said the Mod yesterday.

Back to the topic, I doubt much will come of the Delay network while the Republicans run things, they are not interested in oversight or integrity, just power.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Ever *more* proof they were in bed together:

In messages, lobbyist says DeLay pressed for donation
Files suggest Abramoff edited e-mails before forwarding them on to tribes.
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/12/15tribes.html
WASHINGTON ? Newly disclosed e-mail messages from lobbyist Jack Abramoff show that he told an Indian tribe client that he was being pressured by U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land, for a contribution for a $25,000-a-table Republican fundraiser and that DeLay had personally phoned the lobbyist's office in search of the money.

The three-year-old messages suggest that the request was passed on to the tribe for payment within hours. They offer no evidence that DeLay knew such a request for political money would be forwarded to Indian tribes and their gambling operations, and the messages from Abramoff's files suggest that he edited one e-mail to exaggerate any contact with the lawmaker. DeLay's lawyer said DeLay never made the telephone call.

Members of Congress commonly encourage lobbyists to make political contributions, and the contacts are legal so long as there is no promise of official acts in exchange for the money.

The e-mails, obtained by the Justice Department and Senate investigators and made available to The New York Times, are significant because they are the first evidence to demonstrate that Abramoff cited personal pressure from DeLay in trying to persuade Indian tribe clients to send political donations and other money to Washington. The government's scrutiny of ties between Abramoff and DeLay had previously focused on a series of lavish overseas trips taken by the lawmaker.

Abramoff's former lobbying partner pleaded guilty last month to conspiring with Abramoff to defraud Indian tribe clients of millions of dollars in a conspiracy in which they also tried to corrupt members of Congress with gifts, including political donations, in exchange for official acts. Abramoff has not been charged in the case.

The newly disclosed e-mails are dated July 17, 2002. One was said to have been written by Abramoff's assistant, Holly Bowers, and described a phone call from DeLay "about the President's dinner contribution you owe," a reference to the 2002 President's Dinner, a major Republican fundraiser held in June, a month before the e-mail message. "It was the congressman himself," the message said of the call. "Needless to say, I was a bit nervous."

According to the e-mail message, which Abramoff edited and then passed along that same day to the Tigua Indian tribe of El Paso, DeLay said he would "call you again this afternoon or possibly see you at Signatures tonight."

A lawyer for DeLay, Richard Cullen, said the lawmaker had never made such a call to Abramoff's office and that DeLay's legal team had obtained an e-mail message written later in the day by the lobbyist that showed that details in the earlier message had been falsified.

In that message, Abramoff wrote to Bowers: "I played with your email a bit (quite a bit) to scare the Tiguas into getting me that check. I hope you don't mind. I wanted you to see this in the unlikely case that they call and mention it to you."

The later e-mail message does not make clear what Abramoff changed in Bowers' message. Cullen said he obtained the message from a source he would not identify. Cullen relayed the content of the e-mail message to The Times; its authenticity was separately confirmed by a person familiar with the e-mail messages who declined to be identified by name, citing grand jury secrecy.

Abramoff's former lobbying firm, Greenberg Traurig, would not allow Bowers to comment.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
DeLay prosecutor subpoenas Abramoff documents
http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/n...stories/010406dntexdelay.10d94572.html
WASHINGTON - The prosecutor in the Texas money laundering case against Rep. Tom DeLay issued subpoenas Tuesday looking for links between lobbyist Jack Abramoff and fundraising by the former majority leader.

Jack Abramoff District Attorney Ronnie Earle issued the subpoenas in Austin the same day that Abramoff pleaded guilty in Washington to federal charges of conspiracy, tax evasion and mail fraud.

[...]

In the Texas case, Earle sought records from Abramoff's former employers, legal firms Greenberg Traurig LLP and Preston Gates Ellis & Rouvelas Meeds, LLP. He also subpoenaed records from a lawyer for the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, a former Abramoff client, and from a representative for the Barona Band of Mission Indians, a California tribe.

DeLay attorney Dick DeGuerin said Earle "goes where the fish bite."

"Ronnie Earle is an opportunist," DeGuerin said. "He issues subpoenas to try to make a connection between his case and the latest scandal, whatever it happens to be. The Abramoff thing is the latest he's doing. It has nothing to do with the case in Texas. Nothing. Zip."
:laugh: at DeGuerin!
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
And let's look at the scandals currently brewing or recently concluded:



Republican WH official Safavian, arrested and charged in the Abramoff investigation.
Republican Adam Kidan, entered a guilty plea in the Abramoff investigation.
Republican Scanlon, entered a guilty plea in the Abramoff scandal.
Republican Lobbyist, Abramoff, entered a guilty plea in the scandal surrounding his lobbying activities.

Officially named as under investigation:

Republican Rep. Bob Ney, informed that he under investigation for accepting bribes.
Republican Rep. Tom Delay, informed that he too may be under investigation in the case.


Others being 'looked at' as a result of evidence of their association with Abramoff's crimes:

Republican Grover Norquist
Republican Ralph Reed
Republican Sen. Cornyn
Republican Rep. Burns
Republican Rep. Doolittle

Already convicted, through guilty plea in another crime:

Republican Duke Cunningham is also now suspected of having ties to Abramoff's crimes.


Republicans either convicted or under indictment in other crimes, not yet associated with Abramoff, although who knows?

Three Republican Governors, including Gov. Ryan whose administration has generated at least 30 indictments. At least one of these three is currently serving time.

Republican Gov. Taft of Ohio was indicted, paid a fine and is still in office.
Republican operative, Noe of Ohio, also under indictment for various crimes.

And Republican Gov. Fletcher of Ky. pre-emptively pardoning nine people in a case of illegal hiring practices in the Dept. of Transportation (hiring Republicans instead of the mandated merit practices)



And in the Valerie Plame affair, so far:

Republican WH official, Scooter Libby, five indictments, including 'obstruction of justice.



Then there is the Pentagon Spy case:

Republican Larry Franklin, entered a guilty plea to passing along sensitive info to others.
Republican Pentagon employee, Weissman, charged with passing sensitive info to a foreign nation.
Republican Pentagon employee, Rubin, charged with passing sensitive info to a foreign nation.

Presumably as a result of Larry Franklin's 'cooperation',

Republican Douglas Feith, member of the Bush administration, is now also under investigation.




And in the Conrad Black case (Canada's Rupert Murdoch, recently indicted on several counts by the office of Special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald)

Republican Richard Perle is also under investigation by the same office.




And, I believe Rep. Jefferson (D-La) is still under investigation by the FBI.