More proof MSM in bed for Obama

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
The article covers in the picture were interesting.

Incorruptible is bad at making coherent arguments, yes. Sometimes he is right, but often he takes things too far into conspiracy crazy land. Time has different covers for different markets. From what I understand in the media at Fox, CNN, etc. they aren't told directly what to publish so much as the culture of the place has an obvious bias that we all know about anyway.

They frequently make faux pas and mess up their overall message or agenda because the shows and journalists aren't being told or paid off, I notice this all the time. If they were getting paid off they are certainly doing a bad job. The media that you see on TV simply reflects the corporate culture of that particular news network, journalists and different shows have quite a bit of individualism. Time and liberals who woulda thought, thats not really a conspiracy. I like time anyway for entertainment I don't think they are that great for politics.

Are they getting paid off? probably not. Would the liberals want those covers in the USA? Probably not. Is the culture at Time favorable to Obama? Definitely. Well there ya go.
 
Last edited:

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
Its a troll post because it hurts the left.

Time editors make favorable covers for Obama. Time editors get big $$$ jobs working for Obama admins.

To the left posting that = trolling.
 

BlueWolf47

Senior member
Apr 22, 2005
653
0
76
Maybe an admin should check to make sure Michal1980 and Incorruptible don't have the same IP addresses.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Its a troll post because it hurts the left.

Time editors make favorable covers for Obama. Time editors get big $$$ jobs working for Obama admins.

To the left posting that = trolling.

Slow outrage/ conspiracy day, huh?

Time probably didn't put Putin on the cover because they want to sell magazines to everybody, including outrage addicted conspiracy theory fringewhacks.

Putin isn't exactly a big seller in "Conservative" America.
 

Paul98

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2010
3,732
199
106
http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/16/time-mag-hides-putins-success-from-u-s-voters/

Time mag cover has putin on cover, everywhere except in the USA.

Also noted "The protective covers arrive as Time’s managing editor departs for a job working for one of the architects of the Syrian debacle, Secretary of State John Kerry."

This is not proof, this isn't even evidence.

If you would like to give evidence that Time magazine doesn't want to show any bad about Obama. Plus use the evidence from the time covers. You would have to go back years both while Obama is president and while he isn't. Look at the covers between different countries throughout the years. See when they have the same covers and when they are different.
 

Theb

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,533
9
76
This is not proof, this isn't even evidence.

If you would like to give evidence that Time magazine doesn't want to show any bad about Obama. Plus use the evidence from the time covers. You would have to go back years both while Obama is president and while he isn't. Look at the covers between different countries throughout the years. See when they have the same covers and when they are different.

Sounds hard.
 

gevorg

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2004
5,070
1
0
k

tumblr_lvgmaeIVzl1qbzimg.jpg

Wow!