Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: Bar81
Originally posted by: Gamingphreek
Originally posted by: Bar81
All I've done is report the truth. If that gets some upset, there's really not much I can do about it. As to "provoking" a defense, my retort is that I'm not "provoking" anything but for the sake of argument let's say I am, why anyone would need to mount a "defense" of nvidia is beyond me, unless of course.... THEY ARE ON THE PAYROLL. As to it being a minor issue, I don't see where I stated otherwise and if the payroll hadn't freaked out (as usual) then it wouldn't have been a "big issue" Their impassioned defense of the signer of their checks is what made this into a "big issue" On second thought, I guess it's all my fault, you're right I'm just going to go and cry now, thanks for setting me "straight"
ps if you want to see ridiculous threads all you have to look for is the payroll sponsored ones the latest of which is in the video section.
That is the exact thing i am talking about. Your constant references to "the payroll" and what not is what starts sh!t like this. Yes, you did provoke all of this. By including such comments such as "Nvidia's crack driver team has done it again" is dripping with irony and sarcasm. It is a completely slanted point of view. Like i said earlier if you want to present the truth then present it without a bias or dont present it at all.
When in my post did i every "set you straight"? I merely pointed out what was happening in this thread and stated my point of view on the topic.
You put people on the defensive by constantly insulting them. I mean look at your sig!!! Not only that your incredibly slanted posts don't help matters.
You also claim you are reporting the truth. Ok good. It is always nice to know from a member if there is problem with Beta drivers. Cool, like i said earlier you could have just non-chalantly stated it without inserting any slander and everything would be just fine. Instead you post this mess for the second time!!
I still am waiting on a response to my age. Looks to me, Bar81, that you have no response and no counter argument to accurately defend your side. Many people would refer to this thread as a "Moot point".
-Kevin
GET A CLUE PLEASE. First, saying nvidia's driver team is a joke is a matter of opinion and I can state it whether you and the payroll like it or not. If you don't agree then fine, but the facts bear out my contention. And I still don't see how my opinion "provokes a defense" People call out companies all the time, I am never "provoked" to defend any company. I guess you and I are going to have to agree to disagree on this point because if you don't understand this concept then we're not going to see eye to eye.
Honestly, nothing against your HS education, but you really need to learn the definition of words before you use them (i.e. slander) Not only is that the incorrect word in this situation, you actually want to used the term libel. Oh, forget it, just look up several posts where I correct a member with the exact same problem.
As to my sig, if the payroll hadn't, pathetically I might add, tried to ban me it wouldn't have come about. If anything they "provoked" me.
On a final note, PLEASE for everyone's sake look up the definition of "moot point" and learn how to use it properly. I'm sorry to harp on these things but it's really painful to see the English language so improperly applied.
Yes, you can state your opinion. It is a free world and a free messaging board. However it hinders other posts and thread when you bost threads that are so slanted to one side that a response is necessary to level things out.
Oh so im part of the payroll to now? Ok, well please explain how that is now that you know i am in High School still. I cant possibly hold a full time job in California, when i am a High School Student in Virginia.
Why are you brining up grammar? Do you have nothing left to argue that you must resort to correcting my grammar? As for English, i can see your point about slander and libel. I have taken Journalism (didn't like it too much though). Slander is spoken whereas libel is written, so i can see that. I know what "moot point" is. It is essentially saying that the point trying to be made simply could have been avoided and resolved. Additionally it says that there is nothing to argue. Hence i used "moot point" in the correct context, although somewhat stretched ill admit.
While we are talking about my grammar how about i throw this out on the table, just to spice things up.
Your thread says, "One step forward, two steps back". Then in the thread you say that Widescreen is a much larger problem then 3d Glasses are. So would that negate you subtopic point? Shouldn't it read two steps forward one step back. Because also according to you Widescreen users make up a huge part of the PC Users here (that was cited from your last rant about how bad Nvidia's drivers are).
It would seem i have a clue, and can accurately convey all of my thoughts into one logical and sensible post. Also it seems that i also do not have to result to insults to get my point across.
-Kevin
Facebook
Twitter