- Jul 3, 2005
- 594
- 0
- 0
http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=947
This lends much more credence to the claim that Skype artificially fixed the table in Intel's favor with NO technical reason at all. Which may show that what Intel claimed to be code specifically written to run on DC Pentium machines nothing other than a bold faced lie, such as quoted here:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/0,39020336,39251483,00.htm
And we all know the inevitable result of this Intel act of anti-competitive behavior:
http://www.smartofficenews.com.au/Commu...=/Communication/Industry/News/L6X2F4E4
This lends much more credence to the claim that Skype artificially fixed the table in Intel's favor with NO technical reason at all. Which may show that what Intel claimed to be code specifically written to run on DC Pentium machines nothing other than a bold faced lie, such as quoted here:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/0,39020336,39251483,00.htm
Intel approached Skype with its plan to optimise code on its chips for Skype's software so users would have a good experience while hosting conference calls, Crooke said. In recent years, Intel has increasingly touted its software development resources as a competitive advantage over AMD, which also trails Intel in the marketing budget category.
Other x86 processors obviously will not come with the same optimised code found on Intel's chips. Intel and Skype announced a partnership at the Intel Developer Forum last August to make sure Skype's products would run well on Intel's chips.
And we all know the inevitable result of this Intel act of anti-competitive behavior:
http://www.smartofficenews.com.au/Commu...=/Communication/Industry/News/L6X2F4E4