- Jan 7, 2005
- 3,708
- 1
- 0
Edited thread title to be accurate. No proof of anything, I should have used alleged from the get-go.
Original Thread:
Link
More information has come out, including a supposed former guard at Gitmo that says that inmates were taken to a separate secret camp where they could be tortured.
New article
Some pertinent quotes:
Sounds like clear cut torture to me, and it happened in 2006, 5 years after 9/11. No ticking time bomb here, just routine torture.
So the autopsy showed evidence consistent with strangulation, not hanging? Hmmm....
As noted in the Salon article, 100+ people have died in US custody as the result of "interrogations". So where is the investigation? Where are the charges for 100 murders?
I guess these retired US Army generals are just "evil leftist liberals" who are lying, when they admit that we torture and kill people. So are we a nation of laws or not?
Original Thread:
Link
More information has come out, including a supposed former guard at Gitmo that says that inmates were taken to a separate secret camp where they could be tortured.
New article
Some pertinent quotes:
On June 9th, 2006, [Aamer] was beaten for two and a half hours straight. Seven naval military police participated in his beating. Mr. Aamer stated he had refused to provide a retina scan and fingerprints. He reported to me that he was strapped to a chair, fully restrained at the head, arms and legs. The MPs inflicted so much pain, Mr. Aamer said he thought he was going to die. The MPs pressed on pressure points all over his body: his temples, just under his jawline, in the hollow beneath his ears. They choked him. They bent his nose repeatedly so hard to the side he thought it would break. They pinched his thighs and feet constantly. They gouged his eyes. They held his eyes open and shined a mag-lite in them for minutes on end, generating intense heat. They bent his fingers until he screamed. When he screamed, they cut off his airway, then put a mask on him so he could not cry out.
Sounds like clear cut torture to me, and it happened in 2006, 5 years after 9/11. No ticking time bomb here, just routine torture.
The pathologists place the time of death at least a couple of hours before the bodies were discovered, which would be sometime before 10:30 p.m. on June 9. Additionally, the autopsy of Al-Salami states that his hyoid bone was broken, a phenomenon usually associated with manual strangulation, not hanging.
So the autopsy showed evidence consistent with strangulation, not hanging? Hmmm....
As noted in the Salon article, 100+ people have died in US custody as the result of "interrogations". So where is the investigation? Where are the charges for 100 murders?
That's because America implemented and maintained a systematic torture regime spread throughout our worldwide, due-process-free detention system. There have been at least 100 deaths of detainees in American custody who died during or as the result of interrogation. Gen. Barry McCaffrey said: "We tortured people unmercifully. We probably murdered dozens of them during the course of that, both the armed forces and the C.I.A." Gen. Antonio Taguba said after investigating the Abu Ghraib abuses and finding they were part and parcel of official policy sanctioned at the highest levels of the U.S. Government, and not the acts of a few "rogue" agents: "there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be answered is whether those who ordered the use of torture will be held to account."
I guess these retired US Army generals are just "evil leftist liberals" who are lying, when they admit that we torture and kill people. So are we a nation of laws or not?
Last edited: