• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

More fine people threaten restaurant employees after facemask order

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Very funny analogy, but it is just that, an analogy. Intuitively, yes, it would appear obvious that masks would prevent spread. However, as I said, scientific opinion is mixed, and even the CDC reversed themselves, without publishing any data that explains how they came to that decision. My point is that a mask *will not* prevent one from getting infected, so we should not become overconfident.

False. *May not* is considerably more accurate. That's not the sole purpose of masks, anyway. Surgical masks, for example, aren't intended to protect the wearer so much as they're intended for the wearer to keep their germs to themselves.
 
From what is so far known, CV is only weakly airborne. Primary means of transmission is touch. As such, the face masks are fine but I think they probably shouldn't be a legal requirement like they are in much of the bay area and LA right now.
 
From what is so far known, CV is only weakly airborne. Primary means of transmission is touch. As such, the face masks are fine but I think they probably shouldn't be a legal requirement like they are in much of the bay area and LA right now.

That's not really correct. Airborne transmission is a scientific term not covering droplets generated by coughing, sneezing or even clearing your throat.


Masks inhibit droplets from being expelled by the wearer to infect others directly or to land on surfaces where others pick them up. They also inhibit the wearer from touching their mouth & nose to transmit the virus to & from surfaces with their hands.

There is also some evidence that the virus can be spread simply by breathing-

 
My point is that a mask *will not* prevent one from getting infected, so we should not become overconfident.

The point is never about immunity through masks.
It is about reduction through masks.
And it absolutely will slow the rate of spread, particularly if the people who have COVID are wearing them.
 
That's not really correct. Airborne transmission is a scientific term not covering droplets generated by coughing, sneezing or even clearing your throat.


I know what airborne means and what it doesn't mean. I'm aware that there is debatable evidence as to whether it can be transmitted through ordinary exhalation, though they aren't quite certain about that yet.


Which means it's likely to turn out to be an unlikely means of transmission. If this were highly airborne, we'd know it by now.

Masks inhibit droplets from being expelled by the wearer to infect others directly or to land on surfaces where others pick them up. They also inhibit the wearer from touching their mouth & nose to transmit the virus to & from surfaces with their hands.

There is also some evidence that the virus can be spread simply by breathing-


Yes, that's the point of the mask. But it's a minor safety measure here because it mainly protects against picking it up through coughing and sneezing in public. But people who are symptomatic are not really going out these days, and asymptomatic carriers aren't coughing and sneezing, by definition.

I don't think the masks are preventing terribly many infections. As such, it's better as a best practices advisory than as a legal requirement.
 
Who else would threaten somebody for telling them to wear a mask?

Doesn't have to be "right wing nuts".

Could be the ones who would shoot and kill a store security guard for "disrespecting" someone who told them to wear a mask.


Or even the young and drunk who would push a park ranger in a lake for asking them to social distance.

 
Waiting for the PABOTUS to chime in on this one. I'd really like to see people cuffed for their stupidity, just so they can kind of get "scared straight" by the law, but in practical terms, I don't fault the mayor for changing it to a recommendation. The odds of violence against restaurant owners is far greater than the odds of compliance. Maybe coronavirus will take care of this one for us?


I guess the US now routinely gives in to the demand of terrorists.
 
Doesn't have to be "right wing nuts".

Could be the ones who would shoot and kill a store security guard for "disrespecting" someone who told them to wear a mask.


Or even the young and drunk who would push a park ranger in a lake for asking them to social distance.


Morons basically
 
I guess the democrats that founded the KKK invited a lot of republicans to the meetings?

Yes the founders of the KKK were democrats. Care to guess which party modern day KKK members support?

BTW I know this has been discussed many times here so not even you can claim ignorance on this point. Your post was just stupid.
 
I don't think the masks are preventing terribly many infections. As such, it's better as a best practices advisory than as a legal requirement.

Most of the scientific discussion around surgical and cloth masks is that they do probably drive down R0 by source control, by how much is a matter of debate. There seems to be some evidence that you need to be exposed to a substantial amount of virus to become infected and masks would reduce, if not eliminate, what's coming from a given source and slightly reduce what people are taking in. Since there are a bunch of pre or asymptomatic people walking around you need everybody in them.

Anyway this is like the most minimal personal intervention you could ask people to maintain. There is no good reason not to do it.
 
I guess the democrats that founded the KKK invited a lot of republicans to the meetings?

Unless you are implying that the people who founded the kkk are still alive, what you posted was pure stupidity. Was that on purpose or can you not help it?
 
Greenman is still clinging to the past, when Republicans were the party of Lincoln. That ship has sailed buddy. Eisenhower was the last great Republican. GOP is now and forever more known as the Party of Trump aka the Party of Failure. The only thing they’re good at is pandering to billionaires and cheating to win elections. Real Republicans have slowly been leaving, even before Trump came along. Since Trump, they’re even starting to lose their hold on rural farmers and ranchers.

Why else do you think the GOP is so desperate for the votes of white terrorists, racist former Southern Democrats, and religious fanatics? Because billionaires still only get one vote, and no one else with a brain is left.
 
Who would have guessed that conservatives would once again dig in on the wrong side of an issue?

That is all modern conservatism is any more. If liberals like something, then it must be bad. We need a name for this Law.
 
I know what airborne means and what it doesn't mean. I'm aware that there is debatable evidence as to whether it can be transmitted through ordinary exhalation, though they aren't quite certain about that yet.


Which means it's likely to turn out to be an unlikely means of transmission. If this were highly airborne, we'd know it by now.



Yes, that's the point of the mask. But it's a minor safety measure here because it mainly protects against picking it up through coughing and sneezing in public. But people who are symptomatic are not really going out these days, and asymptomatic carriers aren't coughing and sneezing, by definition.

I don't think the masks are preventing terribly many infections. As such, it's better as a best practices advisory than as a legal requirement.
Hay fever? Pretty sure sneezing is not a symptom of COVID.
 
Who would have guessed that conservatives would once again dig in on the wrong side of an issue?

That is all modern conservatism is any more. If liberals like something, then it must be bad. We need a name for this Law.

The key to identity politics is to maintain the us vs them mentality. Focusing on that means you don’t have to focus on actual policies or any standard of governance which if you haven’t noticed, the GOP has been severely lacking for over a decade now.
 
you don't wear masks to protect yourself, it's to protect others from you. your breath plume is greatly reduced with a mask on. The distance that you can put out droplets is reduced.
 
Back
Top