Newell Steamer
Diamond Member
- Jan 27, 2014
- 6,894
- 8
- 0
You sure you aren't mixing up BMR and TDEE?About 2500 for men, or more than that if you're grotesquely overweight.
So, the government must now name a new Czar, and create a new department, and food suppliers must add new labels. Thus driving the price of my pizza up a dollar to tell me something I already knew.
Thanks Obama!
And you automatically assumed our eater is a she, for good reason.
Basically, this seems to be condoning starvation diets, which are not remotely healthy.
Right, it's bullshit. She'd have to spend that time to burn off those calories if those calories were added to the baseline she already burned through normal activity in a given time period, and if she really cared about the amount of weight those additional calories would convert to. Unless she is exceeding her needs by the same amount every day as a matter of habit this is completely meaningless. It's the sort of pseudo-scientific pablum modern media consumers lap up, though.
Except most Americans are exceeding their caloric needs every day which is why it's not meaningless. We are getting fatter by the hour and half of America doesn't even know what their BMR should be.
You sure you aren't mixing up BMR and TDEE?
BMR : What you burn if you're comatose
TDEE : BMR + additional calories burnt doing ANYTHING else (farting, jerking off, etc.)
Example : 220lbs 6ft guy with 22% BF - BMR : 2055, TDEE (sedentary) : 2466 (using Katch-McCardle)
Depends on if I have your visa or not....:sneaky:You're probably not ordering pizza if you're in a coma.
How the heck much M&Ms did you grab?
Wouldn't even just walking a level 20km burn close to 1100 calories? That's assuming 10min/km for a 160lbs guy.
I am for these ads. People seem to think a walk around the block will burn off a hamburger.
Definitely. If it were my whaley ass walking a level 20km, it would be ~1700calsThe calculator had told me it was like 200 calories or something, and the M&M's were like a couple hundred on their own. Though I'm thinking/hoping that calculator was wrong. :awe:
Actually, the math kinda works out (depending on your caloric intake over that period).The dynamics of exercise and diet are not as simple as that. About 18 months ago I made one dietary change, removing sugar from my daily coffee intake (about 6-8 cups/day, 3 tsps of sugar/cup), and started walking two miles a night with my dogs. The net result for me after a year and a half is > 40 pounds net weight reduction (my previous weight was in the neighborhood of 265 lbs, and I am now around 220 lbs.), and 6" waist size reduction (44" to 38"). I doubt that you could make the math on that work out using simple metrics for how many calories a brisk walk burns, and how many calories are in the sugar I stopped eating, however, that is what happened as can be attested to by family, friends, and previous posts I've made here.
Definitely. If it were my whaley ass walking a level 20km, it would be ~1700cals
Actually, the math kinda works out (depending on your caloric intake over that period).
Two miles ~320 calories burned at your weight, potentially equating to ~0.64lbs/week of loss.
Assuming you weren't overindulging (ie. your intake was >= BMR but <= TDEE w/o the walking) :
18mo x 4 x 0.64 = 46.08lbs loss
Sounds about right to me.
Exactly! Yes, 18 months of effort stinks a little, but when you consider it took 1-2 decades for us to get this this, 1-2 years to fix the damage is a bargainI had to drive to philly tonight and was thinking it over and came to the same conclusion. It actually does come pretty close. I figured roughly that 40 lbs == 140k calories, divided by 500 days == 280 calories a day.
Exactly! Yes, 18 months of effort stinks a little, but when you consider it took 1-2 decades for us to get this this, 1-2 years to fix the damage is a bargain![]()
