It has nothing to do the fact it's a Dem/Rep Judge. I was simply showing that AT P&N is VERY quick to sit there and start slinging mud at one party when the political relevance of the case really has nothing to do with anything. I was showing that they do not even bring up political non-sense in this case like in other case threads, and when I point out it's a Dem. Judge, oh no! You don't hold yourselves to the same standards that you are critical of. Most people I've seen here say Reps are racist, only care about the rich and so on, correct? That is used around here ANY time a right leaning topic or something they consider the big bad Reps behind. But in the same breath, they say "oh that case was white privilege and the judge letting him off cause he was rich, it has nothing to do with politics." But they make no comment regarding it being a Dem allowing the very things they argue against! Believe me, I knew I'd catch hell because no one is going to willing admit their bias to their party. Party loyalty is a real thing and just odd. People don't vote and care about the right candidate, they vote for their party.
I did point this out in my other thread that was a repost. I mentioned that he had already been convicted and this new probation was the result of him breaking the rules of his probation. It's insanity.
www.nbcnews.com
www.wuwm.com
It has nothing to do the fact it's a Dem/Rep Judge. I was simply showing that AT P&N is VERY quick to sit there and start slinging mud at one party when the political relevance of the case really has nothing to do with anything. I was showing that they do not even bring up political non-sense in this case like in other case threads, and when I point out it's a Dem. Judge, oh no! You don't hold yourselves to the same standards that you are critical of. Most people I've seen here say Reps are racist, only care about the rich and so on, correct? That is used around here ANY time a right leaning topic or something they consider the big bad Reps behind. But in the same breath, they say "oh that case was white privilege and the judge letting him off cause he was rich, it has nothing to do with politics." But they make no comment regarding it being a Dem allowing the very things they argue against! Believe me, I knew I'd catch hell because no one is going to willing admit their bias to their party. Party loyalty is a real thing and just odd. People don't vote and care about the right candidate, they vote for their party.
If you cannot understand the blatant and crystal clear hypocrisy of AT P&N, well, it's just insane. II don't personally care, I just got a good laugh out of seeing it's a Dem protecting a rich little white boy. If a Rep judge did that, oh hell, All of AT P&N would be up in arms and talking all kinds of shit about the other party.
Agree to disagree, but it's a common theme I see in this forum.
It has nothing to do the fact it's a Dem/Rep Judge. I was simply showing that AT P&N is VERY quick to sit there and start slinging mud at one party when the political relevance of the case really has nothing to do with anything. I was showing that they do not even bring up political non-sense in this case like in other case threads, and when I point out it's a Dem. Judge, oh no! You don't hold yourselves to the same standards that you are critical of. Most people I've seen here say Reps are racist, only care about the rich and so on, correct? That is used around here ANY time a right leaning topic or something they consider the big bad Reps behind. But in the same breath, they say "oh that case was white privilege and the judge letting him off cause he was rich, it has nothing to do with politics." But they make no comment regarding it being a Dem allowing the very things they argue against! Believe me, I knew I'd catch hell because no one is going to willing admit their bias to their party. Party loyalty is a real thing and just odd. People don't vote and care about the right candidate, they vote for their party.
If you cannot understand the blatant and crystal clear hypocrisy of AT P&N, well, it's just insane. II don't personally care, I just got a good laugh out of seeing it's a Dem protecting a rich little white boy. If a Rep judge did that, oh hell, All of AT P&N would be up in arms and talking all kinds of shit about the other party.
Agree to disagree, but it's a common theme I see in this forum.
It's the tenant's responsibility to restore the damage, is that what you're saying here?
Yawn. The thread had nothing to do with elevating anyone above the fray. I swear to god, some of you all have serious issues with reading comprehension. Last time I'm going to say it. I only posted it because it's funny there's no talk of it being a Dem, but you look at other court cases and you have idiots spouting anti-party rhetoric left and right. Objectively, looking at it from an outside perspective, this forum is ridiculous. There' a good reason why people in ATOT make fun of this place. I see it now. You twist everything to fit your agenda. Telling me why I made the thread and that I did it as some sort of ego boost or whatever non-sense you tell yourself to sleep better at night.
Yawn. The thread had nothing to do with elevating anyone above the fray. I swear to god, some of you all have serious issues with reading comprehension. Last time I'm going to say it. I only posted it because it's funny there's no talk of it being a Dem, but you look at other court cases and you have idiots spouting anti-party rhetoric left and right. Objectively, looking at it from an outside perspective, this forum is ridiculous. There' a good reason why people in ATOT make fun of this place. I see it now. You twist everything to fit your agenda. Telling me why I made the thread and that I did it as some sort of ego boost or whatever non-sense you tell yourself to sleep better at night.
Yep, anyone who doesn't think like the rest of the sheep is the countries biggest problem. Your thinking is the only right way and anyone else who thinks different, is automatically the "problem". Do you actually read what you write? Sorry my opinion of the state of our political landscape isn't black and white and I see the whole system is pretty much fucked. But hey, I'll enjoy my ignorance and continue with life and believe me, some nerds on a forum are going to bother me with their bullying tactics and trying to denounce anything not aligned with their agenda. Because, thinking differently is wrong!
Speaking of intellectually lazy. Do you honestly think that all Republican's are truly against infrastructure? Or have you ever considered they are voting along the party line? You know, same thing the Dems do? Here is a good read.
Why Biden succeeded on infrastructure (and Trump didn't) (msnbc.com)
So if Republican's were SOOOO against Infrastructure, then exactly why were they trying to pass one? Now the link will tell you how Trump derailed the bill. But also make note of:
Two years later, the Republican settled on a different kind of idea: If he couldn't have an infrastructure deal, then Biden shouldn't get one, either.
Indeed, Politico reported months ago that the former president was determined to "sabotage" the entire process: "Trump is trying to ensure that his successor, Joe Biden, suffers the indignity of the 'infrastructure week' jokes as well."
It's the same thing that Dems do. They vote on party lines and not always what is best for the people. It's a simple fact. The system is flawed. Just my humble opinion.
"nobody gives two shits what his party affiliation was." Exactly my point. They don't care about the Party affiliation in this case, but why do they care in other cases? I've seen it brought up, but no one is calling them names and telling them they are the problem. Because I'm not the mindless sheep just saying "you're right!". But, whatever buddy.
Sure, right after you show me evidence that "Not one R thinks we should let Medicare negotiate drug prices" or "Not one R thinks Medicare should cover hearing aids or vision,"
Projection, all the way down. You're a #bothsides, mealy-mouthed bitch.
You're dense. I'm not #bothsides, I'm #neitherside, I dislike them both. At least use the little bit of brain you have left to get it right. You're so easily triggered, buddy. It's fairly hilarious you are so angry over someone posting an opinion. Seem like the type of guy that goes home and kicks his dog and such.
I'm not angry, I just don't suffer fools to spew bullshit. But keep projecting your insecurities on me, I could care less. I pity any dog you own.
It has nothing to do the fact it's a Dem/Rep Judge. I was simply showing that AT P&N is VERY quick to sit there and start slinging mud at one party when the political relevance of the case really has nothing to do with anything. I was showing that they do not even bring up political non-sense in this case like in other case threads, and when I point out it's a Dem. Judge, oh no! You don't hold yourselves to the same standards that you are critical of. Most people I've seen here say Reps are racist, only care about the rich and so on, correct? That is used around here ANY time a right leaning topic or something they consider the big bad Reps behind. But in the same breath, they say "oh that case was white privilege and the judge letting him off cause he was rich, it has nothing to do with politics." But they make no comment regarding it being a Dem allowing the very things they argue against! Believe me, I knew I'd catch hell because no one is going to willing admit their bias to their party. Party loyalty is a real thing and just odd. People don't vote and care about the right candidate, they vote for their party.
If you cannot understand the blatant and crystal clear hypocrisy of AT P&N, well, it's just insane. II don't personally care, I just got a good laugh out of seeing it's a Dem protecting a rich little white boy. If a Rep judge did that, oh hell, All of AT P&N would be up in arms and talking all kinds of shit about the other party.
Agree to disagree, but it's a common theme I see in this forum.
The funny thing is when Trump was talking about infrastructure, the Dems were like, Let's Do it! The complete opposite of Linus's misinformation.
What in the absolute fuck are you talking about? I didn't make up anything or provide misinformation. Are you seriously unable to read the link I provided?
Facebook
Twitter