Moralpanic's Moral Stand

[GasX]

This thread is what happens when five year olds get internet access.

 

[hungrypete]

<< This thread is what happens when five year olds get internet access. >>



my mom is gonna be home soon, how do i delete my porn cookies?

 

[Looney]

Did you even read that sentence when you quoted it? It says ANY OTHER TECHNICAL SERVICE. Fvckface.

Maybe you should learn to read before you come visit these forums: is the IT industry the only one that has to deal with people having problems?

Yes I do, but maybe I'll just take your sister instead. You can shove your holier-than-thou-anti-tech-bitching-about-users crap right back in your stank little ass.

Aw, is this suppose to scare me into submission? Again, another sign that somebody lacks the ability to argue when they use threat, especially such empty threats.

 

[Mindsink]

Is that the extent of your ability to creatively disparage somebody?

No, but since you're so big on assumptions...hey what the hell, I'll take a crack at one too.

Look at your last post man. Spanky refuted every one of your so-called points (beautifully I might add), and your stance is that he took it out of context. Gimmie a break guy.

 

[Croton]

moralpanic

curious question:
if this story wasn't about a professor, but instead about a janotir, would it be ok then?

a janitor doesn't make a lot of money -- which must mean that they are dumb.

 

[Looney]

curious question:
if this story wasn't about a professor, but instead about a janotir, would it be ok then?

a janitor doesn't make a lot of money -- which must mean that they are dumb.

Actually it wouldn't. Although giving the janitor a darwin award and calling him an idiot would probably be more mean than ignorant, it still wouldn't make a difference. Not everybody possess skills in all areas, some are better in certain areas than others. I've had friends that disparage a girl that didn't know how to change a flat tire, and i reacted the same.

 

[Looney]

Look at your last post man. Spanky refuted every one of your so-called points (beautifully I might add), and your stance is that he took it out of context. Gimmie a break guy.

And i think i did a pretty good job of arguing every point he made, without needing to taking things out of context.

This thread is what happens when five year olds get internet access.

What the hell? I have my own thread to bitch and moan, and people are still whining?

BTW, very original insult.

 

[Mindsink]

Again, another sign that somebody lacks the ability to argue when they use threat, especially such empty threats.

And another sign that somebody lacks the ability to argue is when they offer feckless points to their arguments; and when refuted, blames it on taking things out of context.

We all know what you said. Money and/or Title = intelligence. You then try to defend yourself by saying it's just a safe assumption, not a rule. Guess what buddy, it's not even a safe assumption. For someone who admits to being a failure in life (therefore, according to you, it's safe to assume you're not very intelligent), you seem to bring with yourself an auora of superiority in this forum. How interesting.

 

[GasX]

My comment was made from the perspective of an outsider to the argument.

This thread was created solely to lob an insult to a guy that lobbed an insult at a guy and has become a bunch of guys lobbing insults.

The only thing missing is the nya nya nya nya nyaaaaaa nyas...