Monsanto bankrupts farmers in India, drives 125,000 to suicide

Dufusyte

Senior member
Jul 7, 2000
659
0
0
Monsanto pressured India to pressure rural farmers to plant genetically modified crops to serve as a test market for the new products (gm seed lines). Easy credit plus false promises of prosperity lured the farmers, but failed crops and unpayable debts are driving them to suicide.

This is a pretty shocking story I thought I would share:

The GM genocide: Thousands of Indian farmers are committing suicide after using genetically modified crops

By Andrew Malone

When Prince Charles claimed thousands of Indian farmers were killing themselves after using GM crops, he was branded a scaremonger. In fact, as this chilling dispatch reveals, it's even WORSE than he feared.

The children were inconsolable. Mute with shock and fighting back tears, they huddled beside their mother as friends and neighbours prepared their father's body for cremation on a blazing bonfire built on the cracked, barren fields near their home.

As flames consumed the corpse, Ganjanan, 12, and Kalpana, 14, faced a grim future. While Shankara Mandaukar had hoped his son and daughter would have a better life under India's economic boom, they now face working as slave labour for a few pence a day. Landless and homeless, they will be the lowest of the low.
Indian farmer

Human tragedy: A farmer and child in India's 'suicide belt'

Shankara, respected farmer, loving husband and father, had taken his own life. Less than 24 hours earlier, facing the loss of his land due to debt, he drank a cupful of chemical insecticide.

Unable to pay back the equivalent of two years' earnings, he was in despair. He could see no way out.

There were still marks in the dust where he had writhed in agony. Other villagers looked on - they knew from experience that any intervention was pointless - as he lay doubled up on the ground, crying out in pain and vomiting.

Moaning, he crawled on to a bench outside his simple home 100 miles from Nagpur in central India. An hour later, he stopped making any noise. Then he stopped breathing. At 5pm on Sunday, the life of Shankara Mandaukar came to an end.

As neighbours gathered to pray outside the family home, Nirmala Mandaukar, 50, told how she rushed back from the fields to find her husband dead. 'He was a loving and caring man,' she said, weeping quietly.

'But he couldn't take any more. The mental anguish was too much. We have lost everything.'

Shankara's crop had failed - twice. Of course, famine and pestilence are part of India's ancient story.

But the death of this respected farmer has been blamed on something far more modern and sinister: genetically modified crops.

Shankara, like millions of other Indian farmers, had been promised previously unheard of harvests and income if he switched from farming with traditional seeds to planting GM seeds instead.
Prince Charles

Distressed: Prince Charles has set up charity Bhumi Vardaan Foundation to address the plight of suicide farmers

Beguiled by the promise of future riches, he borrowed money in order to buy the GM seeds. But when the harvests failed, he was left with spiralling debts - and no income.

So Shankara became one of an estimated 125,000 farmers to take their own life as a result of the ruthless drive to use India as a testing ground for genetically modified crops.

The crisis, branded the 'GM Genocide' by campaigners, was highlighted recently when Prince Charles claimed that the issue of GM had become a 'global moral question' - and the time had come to end its unstoppable march.

Speaking by video link to a conference in the Indian capital, Delhi, he infuriated bio-tech leaders and some politicians by condemning 'the truly appalling and tragic rate of small farmer suicides in India, stemming... from the failure of many GM crop varieties'.

Ranged against the Prince are powerful GM lobbyists and prominent politicians, who claim that genetically modified crops have transformed Indian agriculture, providing greater yields than ever before.

The rest of the world, they insist, should embrace 'the future' and follow suit.

So who is telling the truth? To find out, I travelled to the 'suicide belt' in Maharashtra state.

What I found was deeply disturbing - and has profound implications for countries, including Britain, debating whether to allow the planting of seeds manipulated by scientists to circumvent the laws of nature.

For official figures from the Indian Ministry of Agriculture do indeed confirm that in a huge humanitarian crisis, more than 1,000 farmers kill themselves here each month.

Simple, rural people, they are dying slow, agonising deaths. Most swallow insecticide - a pricey substance they were promised they would not need when they were coerced into growing expensive GM crops.

It seems that many are massively in debt to local money-lenders, having over-borrowed to purchase GM seed.

Pro-GM experts claim that it is rural poverty, alcoholism, drought and 'agrarian distress' that is the real reason for the horrific toll.

But, as I discovered during a four-day journey through the epicentre of the disaster, that is not the full story.
Monsanto

In one small village I visited, 18 farmers had committed suicide after being sucked into GM debts. In some cases, women have taken over farms from their dead husbands - only to kill themselves as well.

Latta Ramesh, 38, drank insecticide after her crops failed - two years after her husband disappeared when the GM debts became too much.

She left her ten-year-old son, Rashan, in the care of relatives. 'He cries when he thinks of his mother,' said the dead woman's aunt, sitting listlessly in shade near the fields.

Village after village, families told how they had fallen into debt after being persuaded to buy GM seeds instead of traditional cotton seeds.

The price difference is staggering: £10 for 100 grams of GM seed, compared with less than £10 for 1,000 times more traditional seeds.

But GM salesmen and government officials had promised farmers that these were 'magic seeds' - with better crops that would be free from parasites and insects.

Indeed, in a bid to promote the uptake of GM seeds, traditional varieties were banned from many government seed banks.

The authorities had a vested interest in promoting this new biotechnology. Desperate to escape the grinding poverty of the post-independence years, the Indian government had agreed to allow new bio-tech giants, such as the U.S. market-leader Monsanto, to sell their new seed creations.

In return for allowing western companies access to the second most populated country in the world, with more than one billion people, India was granted International Monetary Fund loans
in the Eighties and Nineties, helping to launch an economic revolution.

But while cities such as Mumbai and Delhi have boomed, the farmers' lives have slid back into the dark ages.

Though areas of India planted with GM seeds have doubled in two years - up to 17 million acres - many famers have found there is a terrible price to be paid.

Far from being 'magic seeds', GM pest-proof 'breeds' of cotton have been devastated by bollworms, a voracious parasite.

Nor were the farmers told that these seeds require double the amount of water. This has proved a matter of life and death.

With rains failing for the past two years, many GM crops have simply withered and died, leaving the farmers with crippling debts and no means of paying them off.

Having taken loans from traditional money lenders at extortionate rates, hundreds of thousands of small farmers have faced losing their land as the expensive seeds fail, while those who could struggle on faced a fresh crisis.

When crops failed in the past, farmers could still save seeds and replant them the following year.

But with GM seeds they cannot do this. That's because GM seeds contain so- called 'terminator technology', meaning that they have been genetically modified so that the resulting crops do not produce viable seeds of their own.

As a result, farmers have to buy new seeds each year at the same punitive prices. For some, that means the difference between life and death.

Take the case of Suresh Bhalasa, another farmer who was cremated this week, leaving a wife and two children.

As night fell after the ceremony, and neighbours squatted outside while sacred cows were brought in from the fields, his family had no doubt that their troubles stemmed from the moment they were encouraged to buy BT Cotton, a geneticallymodified plant created by Monsanto.

'We are ruined now,' said the dead man's 38-year-old wife. 'We bought 100 grams of BT Cotton. Our crop failed twice. My husband had become depressed. He went out to his field, lay down in the cotton and swallowed insecticide.'

Villagers bundled him into a rickshaw and headed to hospital along rutted farm roads. 'He cried out that he had taken the insecticide and he was sorry,' she said, as her family and neighbours crowded into her home to pay their respects. 'He was dead by the time they got to hospital.'

Asked if the dead man was a 'drunkard' or suffered from other 'social problems', as alleged by pro-GM officials, the quiet, dignified gathering erupted in anger. 'No! No!' one of the dead man's brothers exclaimed. 'Suresh was a good man. He sent his children to school and paid his taxes.

'He was strangled by these magic seeds. They sell us the seeds, saying they will not need expensive pesticides but they do. We have to buy the same seeds from the same company every year. It is killing us. Please tell the world what is happening here.'

Monsanto has admitted that soaring debt was a 'factor in this tragedy'. But pointing out that cotton production had doubled in the past seven years, a spokesman added that there are other reasons for the recent crisis, such as 'untimely rain' or drought, and pointed out that suicides have always been part of rural Indian life.

Officials also point to surveys saying the majority of Indian farmers want GM seeds - no doubt encouraged to do so by aggressive marketing tactics.

During the course of my inquiries in Maharastra, I encountered three 'independent' surveyors scouring villages for information about suicides. They insisted that GM seeds were only 50 per cent more expensive - and then later admitted the difference was 1,000 per cent.

(A Monsanto spokesman later insisted their seed is 'only double' the price of 'official' non-GM seed - but admitted that the difference can be vast if cheaper traditional seeds are sold by 'unscrupulous' merchants, who often also sell 'fake' GM seeds which are prone to disease.)

With rumours of imminent government compensation to stem the wave of deaths, many farmers said they were desperate for any form of assistance. 'We just want to escape from our problems,' one said. 'We just want help to stop any more of us dying.'

Prince Charles is so distressed by the plight of the suicide farmers that he is setting up a charity, the Bhumi Vardaan Foundation, to help those affected and promote organic Indian crops instead of GM.

India's farmers are also starting to fight back. As well as taking GM seed distributors hostage and staging mass protests, one state government is taking legal action against Monsanto for the exorbitant costs of GM seeds.

This came too late for Shankara Mandauker, who was 80,000 rupees (about £1,000) in debt when he took his own life. 'I told him that we can survive,' his widow said, her children still by her side as darkness fell. 'I told him we could find a way out. He just said it was better to die.'

But the debt does not die with her husband: unless she can find a way of paying it off, she will not be able to afford the children's schooling. They will lose their land, joining the hordes seen begging in their thousands by the roadside throughout this vast, chaotic country.

Cruelly, it's the young who are suffering most from the 'GM Genocide' - the very generation supposed to be lifted out of a life of hardship and misery by these 'magic seeds'.

Here in the suicide belt of India, the cost of the genetically modified future is murderously high.

source
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Sadly, there's not much to say. Monsanto bought the Indian government and it effectively owns whatever it wants. Rather than taking their own lives, perhaps it's time to take the pitchforks and have an uprising.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
The free market in India is very much like what corporations want to do in the U.S.
You would think after Bhopal the Indian people would have developed a healthy skepticism about corporations which only 'want to help'
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,061
14,474
146
Engineered population control?

Could this have been the plan by the Indian Government?
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,396
8,559
126
doesn't obama have a lot of ties to monsanto?
 

nixium

Senior member
Aug 25, 2008
919
3
81
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Engineered population control?

Could this have been the plan by the Indian Government?

You sensitivity and compassion astound me. How is it possible for a person like you to exist in this cynical, troubled world?
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,061
14,474
146
Originally posted by: nixium
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Engineered population control?

Could this have been the plan by the Indian Government?

You sensitivity and compassion astound me. How is it possible for a person like you to exist in this cynical, troubled world?

I manage...in spite of my sensitivity and compassion...:roll:

How can anyone be the least bit surprised by this, especially here, where so many are all in favor of corporations having more rights than people?
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
doesn't obama have a lot of ties to monsanto?

Interesting. Did you just make that up as troll bait, or do you have evidence?
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
32,119
50,866
136
When crops failed in the past, farmers could still save seeds and replant them the following year.

But with GM seeds they cannot do this. That's because GM seeds contain so- called 'terminator technology', meaning that they have been genetically modified so that the resulting crops do not produce viable seeds of their own.

As a result, farmers have to buy new seeds each year at the same punitive prices. For some, that means the difference between life and death.


Here's the real reason that gm seeds are a bad idea.....
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,701
6,258
126
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: ElFenix
doesn't obama have a lot of ties to monsanto?

Interesting. Did you just make that up as troll bait, or do you have evidence?

Found this page

More $$ to Dems over Reps, but not a whole lot. Guilliani and other Republicans recieved more than Obama, but none really recieved a whole lot.

Data may not be right up to date, didn't check.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: ElFenix
doesn't obama have a lot of ties to monsanto?

Interesting. Did you just make that up as troll bait, or do you have evidence?

Found this page

More $$ to Dems over Reps, but not a whole lot. Guilliani and other Republicans recieved more than Obama, but none really recieved a whole lot.

Data may not be right up to date, didn't check.

Thanks, I guess ElFenix is just making stuff up again.

 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Engineered population control?

Could this have been the plan by the Indian Government?

Well they do have way more people than what they can support...
 

zoiks

Lifer
Jan 13, 2000
11,787
3
81
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: ElFenix
doesn't obama have a lot of ties to monsanto?

Interesting. Did you just make that up as troll bait, or do you have evidence?

Found this page

More $$ to Dems over Reps, but not a whole lot. Guilliani and other Republicans recieved more than Obama, but none really recieved a whole lot.

Data may not be right up to date, didn't check.

Thanks, I guess ElFenix is just making stuff up again.

I think he was being sarcastic.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,701
6,258
126
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: ElFenix
doesn't obama have a lot of ties to monsanto?

Interesting. Did you just make that up as troll bait, or do you have evidence?

Found this page

More $$ to Dems over Reps, but not a whole lot. Guilliani and other Republicans recieved more than Obama, but none really recieved a whole lot.

Data may not be right up to date, didn't check.

Thanks, I guess ElFenix is just making stuff up again.

I think he was being sarcastic.

Hope so. You never know in P&N though. :laugh:
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
The only thing I disagree from OP is his statement Monsanto "pressured" Indian government into this. This is a corrupted system, Monsanto is just part of the system. Organization like IMF is controlled by the west and dangles money in front of developing countries so they open their doors to western big businesses. Indian government/politicians take money from the big business and don't protect their own people from big business crap like this. With all these money going around to all different fat boys sitting in different meeting rooms, poor farmer with no power to do anything suffers.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Had there been no drought, the story may have been different.

When one tests in a lab, the results will end up meeting expectations. By either fixing the issues or changing the requirements.

Controlled testing is the same.

Real world is different - Indian government is culpable for forcing an all or nothing by withholding the original type of seeds from planting.
However, testing in the real world is required so Monsanto can not be held completely at fault. If a bad seed gets out, you do not want it to reproduce. Once the seed has value in the real world, then you can remove the shackles.
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
As I was reading the article, I was thinking "well it's unfortunate that the crops failed but it's most probably because of said lack of rainfall in past 2 yrs"

Until I came to this
When crops failed in the past, farmers could still save seeds and replant them the following year.
But with GM seeds they cannot do this. That's because GM seeds contain so- called 'terminator technology', meaning that they have been genetically modified so that the resulting crops do not produce viable seeds of their own. As a result, farmers have to buy new seeds each year at the same punitive prices.

that is criminal right there!
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,701
6,258
126
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
Had there been no drought, the story may have been different.

When one tests in a lab, the results will end up meeting expectations. By either fixing the issues or changing the requirements.

Controlled testing is the same.

Real world is different - Indian government is culpable for forcing an all or nothing by withholding the original type of seeds from planting.
However, testing in the real world is required so Monsanto can not be held completely at fault. If a bad seed gets out, you do not want it to reproduce. Once the seed has value in the real world, then you can remove the shackles.

Hmm, good point. It would seem prudent that future attempts at these types of experiments should require necessary backup plans. I suppose this is just one of those "Price of Progress" events where the unexpected occurs and we all learn something valuable from the subsequent tragedy.