Monotheism is an inferior belief system

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
In the past mods have closed down threads about religion because they have no politics or news. Considering this is a troll thread why not apply that policy consistently, as in here.
 

lothar

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2000
6,674
7
76
In the past mods have closed down threads about religion because they have no politics or news. Considering this is a troll thread why not apply that policy consistently, as in here.

Because I would prefer to see it here than in OT.

Sent from my GT-I9100
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
Everything from Christians who won't drink or dance to Muslims who tear down statues.

I never understood where Christianity got those beliefs...they are NOT part of Judaism. Judaism uses wine continuously and Jesus Himself created wine from water. King David, who God loved, danced and sang and drank.

The sin is not in the drinking or the dancing, it is in drinking to excess and dancing to sexually attract someone who you should not have sexual relations with.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Politics? Nope
News? Nope
Bigotry? Yep


Religion is a choice in ideas passed on through generations and word of mouth, nothing more. You can change your religion like underwear unlike Race/Sex etc. -these would constitute a call of bigotry.

When someone can show me a Jesus chromosome you inherit when you get baptized get back to us. Till then here's a hanky, keep your chin up.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Religion is a choice in ideas passed on through generations and word of mouth, nothing more. You can change your religion like underwear unlike Race/Sex etc. -these would constitute a call of bigotry.

When someone can show me a Jesus chromosome you inherit when you get baptized get back to us. Till then here's a hanky, keep your chin up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigotry

Bigotry
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs. The predominant usage in modern English refers to persons hostile to those of differing sex, race, ethnicity, religious beliefs or spirituality, nationality, language, inter-regional prejudice, gender and/or sexual orientation, age, homelessness, various medical disorders particularly behavioral disorders and addictive disorders.
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
Monotheism tends to result in forcible conversions and a far less rich "constellation" of gods. For instance, to an atheist, the tales of Odysseus are far more rich and interesting than the life of Jesus.
The old Greek and Roman gods did seem a lot more interesting. We learned a lot about Greek gods in elementary. This was at a catholic school.

Having multiple gods seems easier to understand. The one god is both loving and hateful. In the old testament he can be argued with, but in the new testament he is more an abstract idea; not an actual person. Greek gods were much simpler. They were basically just people who had power. They have mood swings. Sometimes they are nice, sometimes they are assholes. They're not really worshipped as much as they are respected. Neptune controls the sea, so I should hope he allows me to pass. Praying to him won't help, so all we can do is be hopeful that he's in a good mood today.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigotry

Bigotry
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs. The predominant usage in modern English refers to persons hostile to those of differing sex, race, ethnicity, religious beliefs or spirituality, nationality, language, inter-regional prejudice, gender and/or sexual orientation, age, homelessness, various medical disorders particularly behavioral disorders and addictive disorders.

Meh, that is a super broad view. Religion is not discriminatory, it is a choice thing. I don't buy it. Same difference as me saying Intel sucks ass if I was a AMD fanboi. Religion is a opinion not based in any reality or evidence. I think squash tastes nowhere near as good compared to asparagus. This would be bigotry to whoever wrote that in the wiki also.

This page is highly contested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bigotry#what_is_not_bigotry

If you could prove that my views on religion are not based in logic and I still defended it then that would be bigotry, so show me evidence of religion besides a opinion.

I will gladly admit I had a flawed view. Good luck!
 
Last edited:

mattpegher

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2006
2,203
0
71
Most anthropologic analyses of polytheistic religions suggest that many gods began as regional gods, which became incorporated into a larger mythos as villages interacted with each other. Some were demonized and negative attributes assigned due to conflict and reassignment by the victor. (the common conception of the devil is originally the celtic god of the wood/hunt). Also many anthropologists suggest that a monotheistic earthmother religions predate most polytheistic mythos.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Meh, that is a super broad view. Religion is not discriminatory, it is a choice thing. I don't buy it. Same difference as me saying Intel sucks ass if I was a AMD fanboi. Religion is a opinion not based in any reality or evidence. I think squash tastes nowhere near as good compared to asparagus. This would be bigotry to whoever wrote that in the wiki also.

This page is highly contested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bigotry#what_is_not_bigotry

If you could prove that my views on religion are not based in logic and I still defended it then that would be bigotry, so show me evidence of religion besides a opinion.

I will gladly admit I had a flawed view. Good luck!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(making_excuses)

Rationalization
In psychology and logic, rationalization (also known as making excuses) is an unconscious defense mechanism in which perceived controversial behaviors or feelings are logically justified and explained in a rational or logical manner in order to avoid any true explanation, and are made consciously tolerable-- or even admirable and superior-- by plausible means. Rationalization encourages irrational or unacceptable behavior, motives, or feelings and often involves ad hoc hypothesizing. This process ranges from fully conscious (e.g. to present an external defense against ridicule from others) to mostly subconscious (e.g. to create a block against internal feelings of guilt).

People rationalize for various reasons. Rationalization may differentiate the original deterministic explanation of the behavior or feeling in question. Sometimes rationalization occurs when we think we know ourselves better than we do. It is also an informal fallacy of reasoning.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81


Uh huh. Prove that my bias is not based in logic or that the opinion on that wiki (which is highly contested) is set in stone and I would maybe agree.

Criticizing a opinion is not bigotry unless the person criticizing steadfastly will not accept evidence that it is NOT an opinion but a truth. Which you cannot do. This is all laid out in the wiki comments you linked.

Like I said, good luck convincing anyone that my opinion on a opinion is discriminatory thus bigotry. It is up to the one making huge leaps in logic to prove their opinion as a unchangeable fact, which you cannot do.

And btw, wiki is always a work in progress. This is exactly why they have debate for these types of topics. There is always someone trying to twist something to cover their untenable bias.


Get back to us when religion can be proved as fact, is a actual race with DNA or like having big ears you cannot change.
 
Last edited:

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
Religion serves one major purpose: mass control of populations. Another, more minor purpose of all these made up bullcrap religions is to prevent the formation of any religion based on anything real or truthful whatsoever. For example, take singularity. We are rushing headlong into a convergence of biotechnology that seems to focus on some point in the future. Yet there is no religion based on the concept of a new form of life emerging from this chaotic convergence. No religion. There is very little even in films or books or art of any sort. I find that quite odd. We have things like Borg in Star Trek, but what I'm thinking of is not something human or even remotely human at all. Our culture attempts to paint a human face on it, like with the Borg, or the Matrix.
 

micrometers

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2010
3,473
0
0
lol, so instead of advancing why monotheism is superior to polytheism, this guy just cries bigotry. Typical christian.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
lol, so instead of advancing why monotheism is superior to polytheism, this guy just cries bigotry. Typical christian.



If it were not for their victim trip I don't even see how they would be even relevant in 2012.

Oh well, whatever keeps their collection plates full. I am sure their funny hat leaders need new cadillacs.
 

actuarial

Platinum Member
Jan 22, 2009
2,814
0
71
What about murder?

It could be said that it is a faith-based law because of the 10 Commandments. Yes, it is part of common law, but likely took its roots back to the 10 Commandments, anyway. So, should it be struck from the law because of that?

I agree with nearly everything you wrote, but this seems a little silly. Are you saying that no society prior to learning of the ten commandments had laws against murder?

While I'm not too knowledgeable on the history of ancient legal systems, I find it very hard to believe that there was not some law against murder in any society prior to the 10 commandments AND after the 10 commandments but prior to the story hitting that area.
 

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
I agree with nearly everything you wrote, but this seems a little silly. Are you saying that no society prior to learning of the ten commandments had laws against murder?

While I'm not too knowledgeable on the history of ancient legal systems, I find it very hard to believe that there was not some law against murder in any society prior to the 10 commandments AND after the 10 commandments but prior to the story hitting that area.

Exactly, there were laws and religions a long time before the idea of the 10 commandments and it is safe to assume that in order to live in a group and farm so you can make beer, you need to not kill the people who help you farm and make beer.

The truth is all law, all science, all societal advancement was made for one purpose. To brew beer.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Exactly, there were laws and religions a long time before the idea of the 10 commandments and it is safe to assume that in order to live in a group and farm so you can make beer, you need to not kill the people who help you farm and make beer.

The truth is all law, all science, all societal advancement was made for one purpose. To brew beer.

Being a bit of a fan of ancient Egypt this is although funny far more accurate then assigning some revoloution in morality to the rather recent (in comparison to old kingdom) Christian texts.

Tenenit the egyptian booze goddess was around before some dehydrated dude in the desert talked to a burning bush.

I gotta say those 10 commandments were pretty cool when those pesky nazis opened the Ark and their eyeballs melted though.
 
Last edited:

Albatross

Platinum Member
Jul 17, 2001
2,344
8
81
What a bunch of freaks,everyone knows Buddhism is the most fashionable religion this season.
 

StrangerGuy

Diamond Member
May 9, 2004
8,443
124
106
Monotheism is worse than polytheism, at least the latter acknowledges the possibility of multiple gods.

Both are still retarded though.
 

micrometers

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2010
3,473
0
0
Monotheism seems obsessed with snow white perfection.

While polytheism has a ready explanation for the bad shit that happens in life: the god of the realm was in a bad mood.

When bad things happen in monotheism (I'm only really familiar with Christianity...) it is the devil and possibly related to a moral failing of the person.
 

micrometers

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2010
3,473
0
0
also, if something bad happens to a monotheist, he thinks that the only god has forsaken him and it goes into all aspects of his life. A polytheist OTOH can segment it away as the work of an angry god in that section of the world.
 

TreyRandom

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
3,346
0
76
Monotheism seems obsessed with snow white perfection.

...

When bad things happen in monotheism (I'm only really familiar with Christianity...) it is the devil and possibly related to a moral failing of the person.

also, if something bad happens to a monotheist, he thinks that the only god has forsaken him and it goes into all aspects of his life.

If this is your understanding of Christianity, then you're really not at all familiar with Christianity.

To your first point, the Bible states that nobody is capable of snow-white perfection (Romans 3:23), so it is clear that the Bible is not "obsessed with it". Nor does the Bible require that Christians be perfect.

To your second point, sin can certainly cause bad things to happen, but sometimes bad things just happen. Sometimes, we don't understand why the bad things are happening. But Christians don't run around saying, "The Devil made me do it!"

To your third point, Christians don't automatically believe that God has forsaken them when bad things happen to them. However, it is OK and perfectly natural (even for Christians!) to feel that way during times of crisis. Job did. David did. Even Jesus did. But none of them cursed God for it, and none of them lost faith in God's plan for them.

I'm not trying to convert you. I'm simply saying that you don't have Christianity as figured out as you might think you do.