Even a $20 cooler will out perform the stock one most of the time as long as you shop wisely.
well most HP and Dells I have seen in the past were not using the stock coolers.That's not the point, though. Yes, most of us are enthusiasts and we probably all recognize that if you buy a better cooler than the stock heatsink, it will "outperform" the stock heatsink in terms of keeping your CPU a bit cooler.
That said, look at it this way: Intel sells a hell of a lot of CPUs in any given year - the vast majority of those are going in pre-built machines like Dells/HPs or in user-built machines with no aftermarket cooler. If the stock cooler was not sufficient, we'd likely be hearing a bit more about people's computers melting or bursting into flames.
If no OC (or even mild OC) then the stock cooler is perfectly fine. This goes for both Intel and AMD stock coolers. There's a reason they are bundled with boxed chips - they've been tested to be adequate.
an Arctic Freezer 7 Pro rev 2 would be perfect for you. rev 2 just means thats it made for the newer sockets where the orginal was for sockets like 775. it pops in just like a stock cooler and has good thermal grease already applied. it will make big difference in temps and also allow you to oc if ever you decide to do so.Thanks guys.
Yeah, I'm a gamer, but certainly not an enthusiast. Gonna be building a rather simple i5-750 system in a few weeks and if the stock cooler is adequate, that's more than fine for someone like me. I've built 3 systems for myself in the past, about every 4-5 years or so. And if I don't have to mess with installing some fancy heatsink and using thermal grease, then it's one less thing that I can mess up.
Most of the intel stock fans suck unless you have a case with very good airflow.
an Arctic Freezer 7 Pro rev 2 would be perfect for you. rev 2 just means thats it made for the newer sockets where the orginal was for sockets like 775. it pops in just like a stock cooler and has good thermal grease already applied. it will make big difference in temps and also allow you to oc if ever you decide to do so.
I have one(rev 1) myself and it does a great job of cooling. even at 3.8 my cpu doesnt go over 46-48C while gaming. a stock cooler would have me over 70C in the same scenario.
Stock units will work just fine, otherwise Intel wouldn't have used them, but the unit for the i5 is really pushing it. Layer that on top of the ULTRA HORRIBLE push pin fastening method
Personally, I think they crap, even at stock. Noisey, and they run hotter than I like. Even at stock, they can overheat if it gets hot out, and you don't have great ventilation in the room, they can easily exceed the thermal max.
Example, I friend took a machine I built and put it essentially on a closed cabinet. No AC, and it got up to 80f and the box overheated and locked up.
The i5 retail unit works fine. I've got two of them. If not overclocked, CPUs do not magically perform "better" in any way at lower temperatures, or "worse" in any way at higher temperatures as long as the thermal threshold isn't exceeded.
What did you expect to happen when you shut it in with it's own heat? The whole point is to take in cool(ish) air and expel the heat. Not continuously cycle hot air around like a heater.