Mock Pre-Election Show Down - Condi or Hillary

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Hilliary at least has a faithfull voting base, and won a Senate seat.

Yep, those rich Hollywood Elite are a hell of a voting "base" :p :laugh:

I seem to recall her being a Senator in New York. Doesn't she have to win the most votes to qualify for that?

Also, and correct me if I'm wrong, but Hollywood is no where near NYC.
 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Zappa (my dog) also promises in her term to bring real Honor, Dignity, and Respect to the white house.

Americans don't want that, I only say that because we have never had it before. ;)

 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Also, and correct me if I'm wrong, but Hollywood is no where near NYC.

Geographically? No. But politically and socially ... yes. Both are infestations of liberal fleas.
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Also, and correct me if I'm wrong, but Hollywood is no where near NYC.

Geographically? No. But politically and socially ... yes. Both are infestations of liberal fleas.

And conservatives are the maggots that fester in horsesh*t.... what's your point?
 

ntdz

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
6,989
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Condi or Hillary?

This is like asking if you prefer death by immolation or hypothermia.

LOL. I couldn't agree more, although Condi is the lesser of 2 evils.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
I can't make that choice. I'll continue to vote for the Libertarian candidate.

If either party can produce a decent candidate be they male, female, black, white, purple, hermaphrodite, you name it, I'll vote for them. Too bad neither major party had produced an acceptable presidential candidate in either of the last two elections.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Clinton if she is anything like her husband would get the thumbs up in my books. However i think the Clinton fiasco, new england senator, woman, fear mongering will really put some resistance in her election.

Condi would be running for a party which has strong principles of rule by majority. Condi being black and single will get looked down on. She doesn't seem to have that charisma or joe smoe appeal other presidents have had.

Both are unelectable...

I will actively campaign for Bayh, and i think he is the only democrat with a hope in hell of winning. (aor who i'd want to win)
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Also, and correct me if I'm wrong, but Hollywood is no where near NYC.

Geographically? No. But politically and socially ... yes. Both are infestations of liberal fleas.

And conservatives are the maggots that fester in horsesh*t.... what's your point?

And Iowans like to play in the corn fields all day doing squat-thrusts. Ears to you Pabby :thumbsup: :laugh:
 

Xonoahbin

Senior member
Aug 16, 2005
884
1
81
In reality, I think it'll be Hilary Clinton vs Colin Powell.. female and a minority.. hmmm, wonder what the KKK would think..
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: umbrella39
And Iowans like to play in the corn fields all day doing squat-thrusts. Ears to you Pabby :thumbsup: :laugh:

Michigan has no room to talk :p :laugh:
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: umbrella39
And Iowans like to play in the corn fields all day doing squat-thrusts. Ears to you Pabby :thumbsup: :laugh:

Michigan has no room to talk :p :laugh:

You ain't kidding. Our governor sucks. Our economy sucks. Hell even our football team sucks. Not much to do other than watch the clock.
 

MonkeyK

Golden Member
May 27, 2001
1,396
8
81
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Condi or Hillary?

This is like asking if you prefer death by immolation or hypothermia.

Well if you are going to die, hypothermia is relatively painless....

Which one would be hypothermia?

 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,894
10,718
147
Originally posted by: MonkeyK
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Hillary doesn't have a lesbian bone in her body, imo.

LOL what's a lesbian bone?
Well, first of all, it generally runs on AA batteries. :p

Condi has proven she's willing to go so low as being an idiot's bitch (my husband) if it'll further her career.

Hillary is her own man, through and through. Ah, Maggie Thatcher, we've missed 'ya!

Kind of a dilemma for a true conservative, no? :shocked::laugh:
 

Polish3d

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
5,500
0
0
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Also, and correct me if I'm wrong, but Hollywood is no where near NYC.

Geographically? No. But politically and socially ... yes. Both are infestations of liberal fleas.

And conservatives are the maggots that fester in horsesh*t.... what's your point?

Moderates are the crabs that live amongst the hives!!1111
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Also, and correct me if I'm wrong, but Hollywood is no where near NYC.

Geographically? No. But politically and socially ... yes. Both are infestations of liberal fleas.

And conservatives are the maggots that fester in horsesh*t.... what's your point?

Moderates are the crabs that live amongst the hives!!1111

At least somebody understood my humor there.
 

Kibbo86

Senior member
Oct 9, 2005
347
0
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Also, and correct me if I'm wrong, but Hollywood is no where near NYC.

Geographically? No. But politically and socially ... yes. Both are infestations of liberal fleas.

Your dehumanizing rhetoric smacks of Fascism. You make conservatives look bad. And that's a feat.

Edit:

"Of course the Jew is a human being too. None of us has ever doubted it. But a flea is also an animal. But not a very pleasant one. Since a flea is not a pleasant animal, we have no duty to protect and defend it, to take care of it so that it can bite and torment and torture us. Rather, we make it harmless. It is the same with the Jews." (Joseph Goebbels).
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Pretty sad that many voters would support Hillary because they could not stand to see Condi win, and vice versa...the qualities of the candidates becoming secondary to partisan loyalties.
 

nweaver

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2001
6,813
1
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
I can't make that choice. I'll continue to vote for the Libertarian candidate.

If either party can produce a decent candidate be they male, female, black, white, purple, hermaphrodite, you name it, I'll vote for them. Too bad neither major party had produced an acceptable presidential candidate in either of the last two elections.

it's been far more then 2 elections since either party put up somthing worth even considering. My wife says "but voting outside the major parties is throwing your vote away" and I reply with "no, voting against your ideals and beliefs because they don't have a captial R or D by their name is throwing it away".

And no "true" conservative has voted republican in forever. Most "true" conservatives are really libertarians or constutionalists in hiding!
 

ExpertNovice

Senior member
Mar 4, 2005
939
0
0
As stated in another thread. Hillary would win easily.

Assuming that only those two were on the ballot, it is my assumption that
90% of the voting conservatives would vote for Condi, 5% would vote for Hillary, and 5% that are racists would vote for Hillary. About 30% of the voting conservatives would vote.

60% of the voting liberals would vote for Hillary because she is ultra liberal. 20% would vote for her because she is Democrat. 20% would vote for her because they are dead and have no choice. 80% of the liberals would turn out to vote because they would not allow a black woman into such a powerful office.

No need to mention what moderates would do, the overwhelming numbers of liberal voters would carry the day.