Originally posted by: Tab
I would be voting agaisnt Condi Rice.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Condi or Hillary?
This is like asking if you prefer death by immolation or hypothermia.
Originally posted by: Harvey
[ X ] ........ Neither of the above is acceptable.
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Nader, or my dog.
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Nader, or my dog.
As much as I like Nader, I'd vote for your dog. I want to see the president lick himself and sh*t at a press conference. That'd be the most honest leader we ever have.
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Hillary doesn't have a lesbian bone in her body, imo.
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Hillary doesn't have a lesbian bone in her body, imo.
I always thought she was asexual, myself.
Not only that, Condi would have to get a boyfriend to stop the obvious questionsOriginally posted by: joshw10
I've heard the argument that Condi would pull some of the black vote (obviously more than the 10% a Republican typically gets) and that's great and all, except blacks don't tend to vote in Republican primaries. I think it's unlikely the Republicans will all agree to nominate the person who will have the best chance in the national election, if that were the case they would have gone with McCain in 2000 and he probably would have had a substantial margin of victory over Gore.
Oh and while Condi might get a substantial amount of the black vote if nominated, she's going to lose a substantial amount of the southern white vote (and there's far more of those than there are black votes). It works both ways. Not saying they'd vote for Hillary, but we'd probably see the largest amount of 3rd party votes in recent history.
We also don't know what skeletons Condi has in her closet. Hillarys have been out for years yet.
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Not only that, Condi would have to get a boyfriend to stop the obvious questionsOriginally posted by: joshw10
I've heard the argument that Condi would pull some of the black vote (obviously more than the 10% a Republican typically gets) and that's great and all, except blacks don't tend to vote in Republican primaries. I think it's unlikely the Republicans will all agree to nominate the person who will have the best chance in the national election, if that were the case they would have gone with McCain in 2000 and he probably would have had a substantial margin of victory over Gore.
Oh and while Condi might get a substantial amount of the black vote if nominated, she's going to lose a substantial amount of the southern white vote (and there's far more of those than there are black votes). It works both ways. Not saying they'd vote for Hillary, but we'd probably see the largest amount of 3rd party votes in recent history.
We also don't know what skeletons Condi has in her closet. Hillarys have been out for years yet.![]()
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Hilliary at least has a faithfull voting base, and won a Senate seat.
