MO AG: PP Has NOT Sold Fetuses

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justic...investigation-Missouri-AG-finds-no-wrongdoing

An investigation in Missouri found no evidence that the Planned Parenthood clinic in St. Louis is selling fetal tissue from abortions, the state attorney general announced on Monday.

No twitching partially aborted fetuses being harvested for organs and body parts. No selling of fetuses. No wrong doing.

“The evidence reviewed by my investigators supports Planned Parenthood’s representation that fetal tissue is handled in accordance with Missouri law,” Koster added in the statement. “We have discovered no evidence whatsoever to suggest that Planned Parenthood’s St. Louis facility is selling fetal tissue.”

Two different committees in the Republican-controlled US House of Representatives are also investigating Planned Parenthood. Earlier this month ranking Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee announced that their investigation has found "no evidence" to support claims that Planned Parenthood is engaged in any illegal activities. Republicans on the committee have yet to release their findings from the investigation. The House Judiciary Committee is also conducting an investigation.

Oh boy - Fetusgahzi? Ben-bortion? Abortgate?
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
28,184
27,632
136
Like this is going to matter? The pp truthers won't let information from investigations get in the way of their sick fantasies.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Who cares? I wish they sold more fetuses so taxpayers didn't need to fund them anymore. The more abortions the better.
 

HTFOff

Golden Member
Oct 3, 2013
1,292
56
91
Who cares? I wish they sold more fetuses so taxpayers didn't need to fund them anymore. The more abortions the better.

No federal funds go towards abortion, silly goose.

The funds help pay the doctor DOING the abortion, and pay for the instruments used to terminate the fetus, and the waste bag where the fetus goes, the waste basket itself, the waste dumpster in the parking lot, the guy who takes said waste to the dumpster out in the parking lot, upkeep for said parking lot, also the lights, you need lights to see, the water bill, property taxes and on and on and on.

Except the act of terminating the fetus itself. No funds go to that, or something.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Federal funds pay for services that don't include abortion. If you think you can provide those services better than PP, then open your own clinic with better service that wins over their patients, and deprive PP of federal funds that way. Don't just single out PP and tell women to go to the dentist instead like GOP has been doing.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Federal funds pay for services that don't include abortion. If you think you can provide those services better than PP, then open your own clinic with better service that wins over their patients, and deprive PP of federal funds that way. Don't just single out PP and tell women to go to the dentist instead like GOP has been doing.

Since abortion is such a small portion of PP's business (3%, right?) they ought to just stop doing them and save themselves all this trouble.

Of course everyone knows that 3% is the part they care most about and would sacrifice every other service they provide in order to keep doing. At some future happy day the blue state abortion rate will reduce their birthrate below replacement level, but I guess until then we'll have to wait.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,564
17,047
136
Since abortion is such a small portion of PP's business (3%, right?) they ought to just stop doing them and save themselves all this trouble.

Of course everyone knows that 3% is the part they care most about and would sacrifice every other service they provide in order to keep doing. At some future happy day the blue state abortion rate will reduce their birthrate below replacement level, but I guess until then we'll have to wait.

While I'm no medical expert I'd guess it has to do with total care.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
49,295
39,616
136
Liberal AG from a liberal state finds liberals not to blame.

Shocking.
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,751
3,155
136
Liberal AG from a liberal state finds liberals not to blame.

Shocking.

no, the AG found that no laws were broken. do you have any evidence whatsoever to the contrary?

and Missouri isn't a liberal state.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
59,744
14,475
136
Since abortion is such a small portion of PP's business (3%, right?) they ought to just stop doing them and save themselves all this trouble.

Of course everyone knows that 3% is the part they care most about and would sacrifice every other service they provide in order to keep doing. At some future happy day the blue state abortion rate will reduce their birthrate below replacement level, but I guess until then we'll have to wait.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL1-340ODCM
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,379
5,936
126
Did the Federal Republicans even Investigate the allegations against PP? Seems to me they simply rushed to Defund PP as fast as they could. Meanwhile, every State that has Investigated the allegations has Cleared PP of any wrongdoing.

Coincidence? :colbert:
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Since abortion is such a small portion of PP's business (3%, right?) they ought to just stop doing them and save themselves all this trouble.

Of course everyone knows that 3% is the part they care most about and would sacrifice every other service they provide in order to keep doing. At some future happy day the blue state abortion rate will reduce their birthrate below replacement level, but I guess until then we'll have to wait.

Excellent point! And since the percentage of people who purchase a handgun for self-defense - and then actually USE the handgun for self-defense - is much smaller than 3%, I'm sure that handgun owners will gladly give up their handguns, too.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
28,184
27,632
136
Excellent point! And since the percentage of people who purchase a handgun for self-defense - and then actually USE the handgun for self-defense - is much smaller than 3%, I'm sure that handgun owners will gladly give up their handguns, too.

I'm sorry, your example includes guns, it doesn't apply.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Excellent point! And since the percentage of people who purchase a handgun for self-defense - and then actually USE the handgun for self-defense - is much smaller than 3%, I'm sure that handgun owners will gladly give up their handguns, too.

Wrong side of the cash register, we're talking suppliers not customers. The better example would be saying WalMart should stop selling firearms since it represents a small fraction of their income but a huge part of their compliance costs and reputation risk.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,841
15,883
136
Wrong side of the cash register, we're talking suppliers not customers. The better example would be saying WalMart should stop selling firearms since it represents a small fraction of their income but a huge part of their compliance costs and reputation risk.

Well if we start using the tactics of te right then you'd probably get your wish and the "liberals" will start shutting down places that sell guns!

Wouldn't that be great! Your second amendment is intact, you can own a gun, you just can't get one anywhere!
I'm sure you righties would smile and keep your mouths shut, right?
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Well if we start using the tactics of te right then you'd probably get your wish and the "liberals" will start shutting down places that sell guns!

Wouldn't that be great! Your second amendment is intact, you can own a gun, you just can't get one anywhere!
I'm sure you righties would smile and keep your mouths shut, right?

Are legislators subsidizing gun stores to the tune of 100s of millions annually like they are PP?
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Since abortion is such a small portion of PP's business (3%, right?) they ought to just stop doing them and save themselves all this trouble.

Of course everyone knows that 3% is the part they care most about and would sacrifice every other service they provide in order to keep doing. At some future happy day the blue state abortion rate will reduce their birthrate below replacement level, but I guess until then we'll have to wait.

Why don't you mind your own business and let them mind theirs? If you don't think federal government should help fund women's health services, then come out and say so. But if they choose to fund them, they shouldn't be picking winners and losers. Let women decide where they get those services.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Wrong side of the cash register, we're talking suppliers not customers. The better example would be saying WalMart should stop selling firearms since it represents a small fraction of their income but a huge part of their compliance costs and reputation risk.
I see. So since PP uses only a small percentage of their resources for abortions, Republicans want to shut PP down. But if PP used - say - 75% of their resources for abortions (and received public funding for the other 25%), then Republicans would leave them alone.

Have I got that right?
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,770
4,627
136
no, the AG found that no laws were broken. do you have any evidence whatsoever to the contrary?

and Missouri isn't a liberal state.

Anything that doesn't find PP to blame has a liberal bias. Still doesn't stop the liberal media from insisting PP doesn't actually harvest baby brains while they're awake and kicking in pain. :hmm:
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
49,295
39,616
136
Anything that doesn't find PP to blame has a liberal bias. Still doesn't stop the liberal media from insisting PP doesn't actually harvest baby brains while they're awake and kicking in pain. :hmm:

Liberals will say anything to keep letting other liberals kill little unborn liberals.