Mitt Romney: "Of course my numbers add up. I was in business"

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Whats good for Romney's business isn't good for American business. Whats good for American business isn't necessarily good for America. America is a COUNTRY not a BUSINESS. Their reason to exist is completely different.
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
Still, many would prefer someone who knows business intimately vs. someone who doesn't when it comes to the economics of the US.
 

dawheat

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
3,132
93
91
Duh - pirate capitalism is what we need to take on China and beat them at their own game. When I get costs on labor in the US to match costs in China - mission accomplished.
 

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
I love how he says he's all about small business. Romney's idea of small business is one that only has a single corporate jet.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Just like when he said he wasn't part of Bain Capital anymore only to find out he still was.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Quick Dev, make up as many stupid threads as you can.

So even you recognize the lameness of that particular Romney duh-version, which is why you'd rather nobody bring it up. Understood.

I'm sure Mitt said the same thing to the investors he fleeced in KB toys, Jumbo stores, Stage stores, FAOSchwartz & a few others...

"Of course my numbers add up! Trust me!"
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
I'd be willing it give a successful business man a chance when we are hemorrhaging 1Trillion every year.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Still, many would prefer someone who knows business intimately vs. someone who doesn't when it comes to the economics of the US.

Yes, because Hoover and GHWB and GWB were 3 of our greatest presidents ever and about the only 3 who had "business" experience. LOL, you righties are so fucked up with your thinking.

I worked on Wall Street, I deal with them every day still. I don't want a single one of them anywhere near the executive. It's already gone too far with how much influence bankers have on the government and it needs to be rolled back.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
I'd be willing it give a successful business man a chance when we are hemorrhaging 1Trillion every year.

Because Romney is so great at loading up struggling companies with massive amounts of debt when he can write off the interest and then put it into bankruptcy later only to still collect his 2/20 with carried interest regardless of the failure with no clawbacks.

So, how, exactly, do you translate that bit of bullshittery into a global stage? Does the US Government open up a Cayman Island account?

You're forgetting the reason why we are hemorrhaging $1tr a year, the same fucking policies Mittens wants to push further. What are they going to do when the Reagan/GHWB/GWB policies pushed further by Mittens results in even more debt? Watch the economy collapse and then blame it on the Democrat president again?

"Well duh, we didn't fuck it up, the guy who came after us fucked it up, but we promise, if we quintuple down on Reaganomics, it'll work. NO cap gains taxes at all, top marginal tax bracket BELOW the middle class tax bracket (job creators need more money)...etc. WE PROMISE, it'll work this time, it's all the Dem president's fault!"

Why don't you people listen. REAGANOMICS IS A FUCKING JOKE.
 
Last edited:

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
Because Romney is so great at loading up struggling companies with massive amounts of debt when he can write off the interest and then put it into bankruptcy later only to still collect his 2/20 with carried interest regardless of the failure with no clawbacks.

So, how, exactly, do you translate that bit of bullshittery into a global stage? Does the US Government open up a Cayman Island account?

You're forgetting the reason why we are hemorrhaging $1tr a year, the same fucking policies Mittens wants to push further.

Looks like it worked fine for Mass.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
One thing is for certain...Romney will have to go back to work for Bain in November...

Not with the deal he got on exiting- he's set for life on $250M+ in assets & $20M/yr income, all tucked away in a "blind" trust.

Well, unless he ends up having to pay 19% in Federal taxes rather than 14%- that'd be like the invasion of Poland or the Holocaust, or something really, really terrible, like weeping crocodile tears on the balance sheets... The horror!
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
I don't see what's so bad about letting a businessman run a country.

A country operates on revenue (taxes) and expenditures like a business. I see no reason to let a lawyer run a country more than a businessman, but that's just me.

And who cares if Bain Capital shut companies down. The Kansas steel company is the best example. That company was dying, and the US steel industry is in general. If you want to remain competitive, then the US needs to move on. That might have been "high tech" 100 years ago, but high tech now means a lot more.