Dr. Paul should be President Paul based on his virtues alone. His positions shouldn't matter to anyone.
wutDr. Paul should be President Paul based on his virtues alone. His positions shouldn't matter to anyone.
Why? Even if Ron Paul didn't have a laughably poor understanding of the Constitution, why would the person who understands it the best be the person we should elect president? That's incredibly silly.
Dr. Paul should be President Paul based on his virtues alone. His positions shouldn't matter to anyone.
First of all, steadfast communism is a vice, not a virtue.His main virtue seems to be steadfastly sticking to his position and refusing to move an inch for any reason. Sometimes admirable, but not a great trait when you want to lead a democracy.
He's an interesting guy who definitely helps shape the debate...and that's what his particular "virtues" are good for. Actually leading the country? He's had YEARS in Congress and been totally unable to produce anything that looks like a result of any kind. That's not particularly useful, IMO.
In any case, I don't think you're really being honest with yourself. If he was a steadfast communist, I doubt you'd support him.
Mitt Romney: I dont know what the Constitution says! Ask Ron Paul
even Constitutional Professor Obama, I'm sure, employs people far more versed than him in matters of constitutional law.
I'm not sure how much an OBGYN knows about the Constitution and it really shows when we look at Ron Paul. Plus he's not much of a Constitutionalist when he wants to rip up so much of the Constitution.
Seriously, if Romney is looking at Ron Paul for help on the Constitution, then Romney is pretty clueless if he's going to someone as dumb and senile as Ron Paul.
This reflects very poorly on Romney. Everyone already knows that Ron Paul shits upon the Constitution. No reasonable person would ask him.
Give me an example of Paul doing so.
From what I've seen (granted I haven't dug in too deeply) he seems to mind the Constitution more than Obama or Bush.
Give me an example of Paul doing so.
From what I've seen (granted I haven't dug in too deeply) he seems to mind the Constitution more than Obama or Bush.
This reflects very poorly on Romney. Everyone already knows that Ron Paul shits upon the Constitution. No reasonable person would ask him.
The man is truly vile.
You'll have to ignore CoW, and Rabidfailgoose, they are trolls of the highest order that get little boners when they find a RP thread to post their ignorance in.
How can you 'mind the Constitution' so much when you want to remove and forget entire portions of it?
Why? Even if Ron Paul didn't have a laughably poor understanding of the Constitution, why would the person who understands it the best be the person we should elect president? That's incredibly silly.
See my comment above. Give solid, concrete examples to back up your claims.
14th Amendment. Ron Paul opposes it.
This has been repeated over and over by all sorts of people in all sorts of topics here. Just read any Paulbot topic and you'll discover the truth as mentioned by many posters. You'll just have to sift through the Paulbot lies.