• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

MIT says RIAA is legally challenged (aka MIT gets subpoena)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: FallenHero
MIT should just let skynet into the RIAA computers.

that would teach them. have skynet monitor our p2p networks and skan for false music/file/video titles and poor image/sound quality.
 
if caught according to the law i can face total financial penalty between $1,746,000 (2232 songs x $750) and $ 174,225,000(2232 x $75,000) . Too bad my net worth is actually in the red from student loans. I hope they sue me.
 
If they sue me over my collection of MP3 LOL.... I'll max out all my CC credits and cash advances... file for chapter 11. lol 🙂 take that RIAA.


--Scsi
 
Originally posted by: Howard
His music (most of it, at least) doesn't suck. It's just what he's done to himself, and his private life; those are the only questionable things, IMO.

Yep, even in his newest stuff, he still has an excellent voice and makes decent music. It's sad that he has all his problems, though.
 
Originally posted by: Nocturnal
The RIAA right now are sitting back in their comfy seat, laughing at everyone. "HAHAHA we are going to be rich!"

Anyone know how to get a job with the RIAA??

Sell your soul? Seems to have worked for the rest of the RIAA execs
 
Back
Top