Lol! What evidence? How many times do I have to ask before you will provide the evidence that brown attacked wilson? You keep making the claim and yet you can't provide the evidence. Don't you find it odd that the two key situations that would make or break the case is absent of any evidence except for eye witness testimony? You don't find it odd at all that in order for the prosecutor to win the indictment and have the case go to trial all he would have to do is provide the eye witness testimony that supports darrions version of events and instead the prosecutor sabatoged his own case and provided testimony from witnesses that support Wilson's version of events? You don't find it odd that the prosecutor didn't cross examine any testimony that supported wilson that didn't match previous accounts the witness gave? You didnt find it odd that a prosecutor, whose sole responsibility in a grand jury hearing is to provide evidence for the prosecution, let wilson himself testify? Nothing odd about that at all huh? I guess you also didn't find it odd that the prosecutor didn't question Wilson's testimony when it contradicted Wilson's original accounting of what happened.
Nope, you don't question anything, so long as you got the result you wanted. All that education you paid for, apparently for nothing. Congrats😉