BTW, Missouri gets $1.30 for every $1 they pay in, so even if those leeches refuse to pay taxes, cutting them off from federal spending would be a net win for America's productive taxpayers.
I agree, but this is one of about half dozen problems I had with the healthcare bill. You can not force people to buy something unless they want to. Obama compared the analogy to auto insurance which is a big lie. Because I only have to buy auto insurance if I am going to drive a car. If people don't want to go to the doctor then they shouldn't have to pay. They needed a better system, but that part of bill was solely for us to pay for insurance for other people. I truly believe major portions of the healthcare bill would be ruled unconstitutional if challenged far enough to the supreme court.
Yes 667,680 71%Not really. We're a pretty evenly split state. Even Columbia (historically liberal college town) went 59% for Prop C.
This will definitely lead to a day in court, but it's more about expressing disapproval for how healthcare is being handled and the intrusion on individual and states rights.
But hey we're Americans (fuck yeah!), we can't follow the examples set by the rest of the world, so instead we end up with a system that relies almost solely on private industry to pick up the slack..
^^^
I thinks he's saying the army the federal government maintains is more powerful than the army Missouri maintains, therefore the federal government has absolute authority over what the states do.
Meaningless. Missouri cannot pass laws that overall the federal one, so they've basically just done nothing.
The rest of the world that relies on American spending to keep costs low? The rest of the world that uses technology, drugs, and treatments developed in and paid for by the US? The rest of the world that year-over-year has countries that have continually lowered health care standards and increasing costs?
Yeah, let's follow that example and see what happens.
It's too bad we don't have government run health care... then we could all eat as many happy meals we want, sit in front of the TV as much as we want, drink and smoke as much as we want, and go outside as little as we want, and costs will stay low... well... because they will. Right..?
Hah I'm gonna pass a law for me that exempts me from federal mandates as well... woohoo.
Did they add the clause that hospitals can reject you without health insurance coverage? If you have a right to not carry insurance, hospitals need to have a right to leave yo' ass on the curb. Can't have your cake and eat it too.
The important part here is the huge margin it passed by. The People are rejecting obamacare in mass.
BTW, Missouri gets $1.30 for every $1 they pay in, so even if those leeches refuse to pay taxes, cutting them off from federal spending would be a net win for America's productive taxpayers.
The important part here is the huge margin it passed by. The People are rejecting obamacare in mass.
Meaningless. Missouri cannot pass laws that overall the federal one, so they've basically just done nothing.
Maybe if we did Americans would be forced to change their habits
Our federal government is held together by force of violence? Not sure how else I was supposed to read that.
The "mandate" is part of the tax code and states cannot selectively exempt their residents from certain parts of it.There is no legal precedent which allows the federal govt. to force individuals to buy health care insurance. That's why lawsuits are progressing through the courts. That the federal government has the right to do so is by no means clear. Until the SCOTUS says otherwise the state law is as valid as the federal.
BTW, I think if Missouri didn't have to comply with federal mandates they wouldn't need any extra money. Let's have everyone there who's unhappy move to DC.
I'm thinking it's time that states rights make a comeback.
The "mandate" is part of the tax code and states cannot selectively exempt their residents from certain parts of it.
If you're moving to Upstate South Carolina from Saint Louis (as implied by your "location"), I can only assume late-onset sanity...Shit...why am I moving away from Missouri?
Poor people generally take in well more in Fed $$$ than they pay out as well. Are poor people 'leeches' and should they be cut off as well for a 'net win' for America?
The skewed numbers are just due to the wing-nuts mobilizing their base. The D's in the state didn't try to fight it and more R seats were up for grabs leading to a higher R turnout.
So "We the people" meaning middle aged white conservative voters have spoken again with unsurprising results.
BTW, Missouri gets $1.30 for every $1 they pay in, so even if those leeches refuse to pay taxes, cutting them off from federal spending would be a net win for America's productive taxpayers.