Here is a definition of a safe space.
What these students are asking for is not what the definition is. If they were, then race/ethnicity should not be an issue.
Except the very reason they're asking for it is ethnicity-related. Just like if some gay people asked for safe space, it's not unrealistic to assume that they might say "no straight people", because the hostility they're likely to receive is likely to come from a subset of that group.
So because its only a little racist its okay?
Your "stereotype" argument appears to have been silently dropped... okay
As I've also previously said, textbook historical examples of racism typically include an element of disparagement (one group believing that it is superior to another), hostility, and marginalisation. This example includes none of those elements.
So again, its only a little segregation so its okay?
It's one place that whites aren't allowed to go. Whites' rights aren't being shat upon left, right and centre, they're not having to fear for their safety, their freedoms and opportunities aren't affected in any way (except not being allowed in one room), so yes, cry me a fucking river.
They said they want to exclude people (segregation) based on race. Your argument is that segregation is okay because its only in 1 place, and its not racist, even though its based on race.
Almost every naysayer has likened this to the racial segregation that occurred in America's past. What I'm saying is, that comparison is complete and utter bullshit because none of the other luggage (ie. the reasons/motivations for segregation), ie. what made it so oppressive, is present here.
What makes the naysayers' reaction so much harder to fathom is that when one looks at the stated motivations for this safe space, they're also completely fucking different to the racial segregation that occurred in America's past, but I know, let's pretend that all race issues have been resolved in Mississippi and that this is all down to some uppity non-whites who vant to vulfill ze dream of non-white supremacy over whites.
I tell you what, if it turns out that this is the work of some non-white supremacists, I'll join you in asking for the "safe space" to be removed. In the meantime, I suggest giving the injured parties some lee-way as I very much doubt that the days of their being discriminated against are over, especially in a state where a flag like that still flies.
Your argument is that these kids are looking for a place to feel safe. They want to be away from the people that make them feel unsafe. Those people that make them feel unsafe, not physically but emotionally, are white people. If white people said that they wanted a place in a hospital where only whites were allowed because they felt unsafe, we would all say that was racist too. You seem to think its okay because its only a little racist and only a little segregation. Sad to see how regressive people can be.
Aaaaand we're going around in circles. In this particular case, I keep correcting you on your use of the word 'unsafe', you keep using it, for reasons best known to yourself. I'm done arguing with you. Everything I've said in this post I've had to say before because you keep asking the same questions and making the same statements.