Missing mem ratio on Albatron PX845PEV Pro--->Fixed! :D

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

scdill

Member
Dec 30, 2000
116
0
0
Is the missing ratios at 100Mhz an Albatron thing, or is it an 845PE "feature"? If its an 845PE feature, do other manufacturer's allow the manual selection of 400/533 (Albatron does not) as a work around?
 

PhoenixOfWater

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,583
0
0
THUGSROOK -
Did you find that the Abit BE7 was under volting?
It looks like the Albatron PX845PEV Pro under volt by .02 to .04 volt
 

Viper96720

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2002
4,390
0
0
No 1:1 ratio? Should have one since if you use 266 memory with a 133fsb processor you would need it. Then when you run the fsb at 166 the memory can be 333. I have a feeling that using auto at 133mhz or above is the 1:1 ratio. Since the 2.5 setting is for 333 when the fsb is 133.
 

PhoenixOfWater

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,583
0
0
if you are using 133fsb processor you get all the mem ratio but if you are using 100fsb processor you are missing 1:1 and 4:5
 

Viper96720

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2002
4,390
0
0
I thought all boards were like that. 4:5, 4:3,and 1:1 available at 133+. 3:4 and 1:1 at 100mhz. My board has a setting to change whether it's a 100mhz or 133mhz cpu. I set it for 133mhz cpu even though it's a 1.6A.
 

oldfart

Lifer
Dec 2, 1999
10,207
0
0
There is always 1:1. I think it is the auto setting. Albatron and Gigabytes ratios are a little different than the norm

1.5 = 4:3
2.0 = 1:1 (or auto?)
2.5 = 4:5
2.66 = 3:4
 

THUGSROOK

Elite Member
Feb 3, 2001
11,847
0
0
Originally posted by: PhoenixOfWater
THUGSROOK -
Did you find that the Abit BE7 was under volting?
It looks like the Albatron PX845PEV Pro under volt by .02 to .04 volt
yes it undervolted ~ but its v-regulation system was great, only dropped .02-.03v under load :Q

still the cold boot issues pissed me off :disgust:
 

PhoenixOfWater

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,583
0
0
Originally posted by: oldfart
There is always 1:1. I think it is the auto setting. Albatron and Gigabytes ratios are a little different than the norm

1.5 = 4:3
2.0 = 1:1 (or auto?)
2.5 = 4:5
2.66 = 3:4

when i use auto it give me 2.66

THUGSROOK -
is there a good way to test for a cold boot ?
 

oldfart

Lifer
Dec 2, 1999
10,207
0
0
when i use auto it give me 2.66
Interesting. Maybe it looks at your ram SPD and determines if it can run 3:4 @ 100 FSB? I'd rather just have manual control like Asus and Abit have.
 

Viper96720

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2002
4,390
0
0
Something must be wrong then. Manual says when cpu host frequency(fsb) is set to 133 you can choose auto,2.0, 2.5, 2.66(turbo mode)
If you got the host frequency at 100 then you would have auto 1.5 and 2.66. Which is what it looks like you got. It sucks that you can't set the host frequency at 133 and get the dividers you need. Still stuck with the 100mhz dividers. Albatron needs to fix the bios. So if your fsb is 133 you get the right dividers. Instead of detecting if the cpu is a 100 or 133.
 

Garster

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
755
0
76
My Albatron 845G board is the same way, now the Epox boards have a jumper to force 133fsb and then you have 4:5 divider in bios. If i set the Epox board to auto detect the cpu and the cpu is a 100fsb chip i only have the 3:4. The 1:1 and 4:3 are available all the time
 

PhoenixOfWater

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,583
0
0
Zap - jspark from the overclockers Forum tryed the pin mod with nail polish and he geting not boot and after he removed polish it boot fine
Link
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
7
81
Strange... should work, but I've never actually tried it. I tried nail polish on socket 370 CPUs (the Tualatin on BX) and didn't have any luck, so ended up breaking pins, which worked. Dunno. Maybe I'll try it with a Celeron 2.0, not too expensive to sacrifice.
 

PhoenixOfWater

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,583
0
0
Originally posted by: Zap
Strange... should work, but I've never actually tried it. I tried nail polish on socket 370 CPUs (the Tualatin on BX) and didn't have any luck, so ended up breaking pins, which worked. Dunno. Maybe I'll try it with a Celeron 2.0, not too expensive to sacrifice.

the pin trick worked :D jspark from the overclockers Forum just redid the trick and saids it works...he haven't reply with anymore info :)
Link

Edit - He reply with more info :D
 

render

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 1999
2,816
0
0
How come this board doesn't have 1:1 memory ratio?

I oced 1.8a and memory automatically set up at 354. I can't oc more because of PC2100 memory I have.
 

PhoenixOfWater

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,583
0
0
Originally posted by: render
How come this board doesn't have 1:1 memory ratio?

I oced 1.8a and memory automatically set up at 354. I can't oc more because of PC2100 memory I have.

Did you read any of the other posting in this thread?!?!?