ShintaiDK
Lifer
- Apr 22, 2012
- 20,378
- 146
- 106
Nope, other way around. Developers stopped supporting legacy dual core architecture.
By setting game affinity to 2-7, that's some serious legacy removal there. A giant leap in software development.
Nope, other way around. Developers stopped supporting legacy dual core architecture.
Exactly. Agree 110%.
Why the hell should we let people hold back game engines because of a couple of cheap complainers (with dual cores)? By going multithreaded for quad, six or even eight cores -- developers can get more advanced, immersive experiences. I was actually happy when Oculus Rift and HTC coming out with high system requirements and kicking the crap boxes to the curb. It's the garbage PC's that are holding the rest of us back.
Developers shouldn't be catering to 2007 CPU architecture anymore. Wanna play a modern game? Well, you need to buy a modern CPU and GPU to do so.
There are more dual core gamers on Steam than quad core ones.
There are more dual core gamers on Steam than quad core ones.
By setting game affinity to 2-7, that's some serious legacy removal there. A giant leap in software development.
This game doesn't actually perform very well. The charts look good, but gameplay tells a different story, and that story is hitching, on an i5 + 970:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jp_AfW9slsI
Developers shouldn't be catering to 2007 CPU architecture anymore. Wanna play a modern game? Well, you need to buy a modern CPU and GPU to do so.
Nope, other way around. Developers stopped supporting legacy dual core architecture. Dual cores are over
a decade old now -- seriously, put the old horse down.... It's got a broken leg.
Is it worth the effort though? The amount of people with Core Pentiums and Celerons is tiny.
I assume you got some numbers to show?
It's actually pretty difficult to stumble upon a Core Celeron or Pentium OEM system these days in the US. So just from that you can pretty much tell. It's all i3/i5 or Atoms.
So, no numbers?
OEMs still sell them.
You do see a couple occasionally. Intel has said in the past that the i5 is by far the biggest seller followed by the i3 and then i7. Pretty sure they said that Celeron/Pentium was behind the i7, don't remember. But that would make sense given that it's so hard to find in an OEM system in the US.
There are more dual core gamers on Steam than quad core ones.
Got a link for that information?
Most have HT though.
Got a link for that information?
Well, it wasn't my post -- but I did find a little info at least in regards to what Newegg sells. I believe they are simply talking about their store and not nationally, but it is an eye opener.
It appears that the FX-6300 is AMD's best seller.... Which surprised me...... I figured it would be one of the octocores. Nothing but i5 and i7 for Intel.
http://blog.neweggbusiness.com/news/best-selling-cpus-of-2015/
