5-13-2004: An enlarged EU fans the fears of Europe's Muslims
5-5-2004: Human rights in an enlarged EU: what can people expect now?
Meanwhile in Slovenia, one of the new additions to the EU, a vote was conducted about 2 weeks ago:
Were they really scrutinized and brought in line with EU practices? Is this really the EU norm?
Beate Winkler, director of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, the EU's race relations watchdog, says enlargement has increased the sense of alienation.
5-5-2004: Human rights in an enlarged EU: what can people expect now?
The official accession to the European Union of ten new member states on 1 May ought to be good news for human rights. Protection of fundamental rights was a critical aspect of the accession process. Candidate countries were scrutinized for years to ensure that their laws and practices were brought in line with EU norms.
The reality is not quite so reassuring. While they are supposed to have passed all the tests to become members of an EU that prides itself on being a Union of values, in practice there are still some serious problems in the new member states. These relate to broad areas of the administration of justice, while discrimination against minorities, in particular Roma, remains a painful reality.
However, all EU members are equal, so on 1 May the scrutiny effectively stopped. In any case, joining the EU is no guarantee that rights will be respected - human rights violations do occur within the EU and they are not just isolated incidents.
Meanwhile in Slovenia, one of the new additions to the EU, a vote was conducted about 2 weeks ago:
More than 18,000 mostly Bosnians, Croats and Serbs were officially erased from state records after Slovenia declared its independence in 1991. The move effectively made them non-persons in the eyes of the government.
In a referendum Sunday, 95 percent of the voters denied restoring the rights to the ethnic minorities.
Were they really scrutinized and brought in line with EU practices? Is this really the EU norm?
