Isn't it required that they make her aware that the conversation is being recorded?Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: yllus
John's Mom: "So, about that $500 from the accident?"
Jane: "What accident? Do I know you? Wrong number...please stop calling."
You need to ask Jane specifically what she said on those phone calls. If these people are indeed trying to swindle her out of money, they've probably recorded the phone conversations. Do you know if she admitted to the accident?
Also is the information she gave the person in her hand writting? Don't listen to these idiots on ATOT telling you to lie, unless you know all the facts.
Originally posted by: minendo
Isn't it required that they make her aware that the conversation is being recorded?Originally posted by: LikeLinusYou need to ask Jane specifically what she said on those phone calls. If these people are indeed trying to swindle her out of money, they've probably recorded the phone conversations. Do you know if she admitted to the accident? Also is the information she gave the person in her hand writting? Don't listen to these idiots on ATOT telling you to lie, unless you know all the facts.Originally posted by: yllus John's Mom: "So, about that $500 from the accident?" Jane: "What accident? Do I know you? Wrong number...please stop calling."
Originally posted by: minendo
Isn't it required that they make her aware that the conversation is being recorded?Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: yllus
John's Mom: "So, about that $500 from the accident?"
Jane: "What accident? Do I know you? Wrong number...please stop calling."
You need to ask Jane specifically what she said on those phone calls. If these people are indeed trying to swindle her out of money, they've probably recorded the phone conversations. Do you know if she admitted to the accident?
Also is the information she gave the person in her hand writting? Don't listen to these idiots on ATOT telling you to lie, unless you know all the facts.
Originally posted by: minendo
Exactly.Originally posted by: dtyn
Was there a police report? No? Then it never happened.![]()
Thanks for the information.Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Federal law allows recording of phone calls and other electronic communications with the consent of at least one party to the call. A majority of the states and territories have adopted wiretapping statutes based on the federal law, although most have also extended the law to cover in-person conversations.
Thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia permit individuals to record conversations to which they are a party without informing the other parties that they are doing so. These laws are referred to as "one-party consent" statutes, and as long as you are a party to the conversation, it is legal for you to record it. (Nevada also has a one-party consent statute, but the state Supreme Court has interpreted it as an all-party rule.)
Originally posted by: freebee
Oh shoot, the response I typed is gone...., anyhows to sum it up....
No police report is necessary. Her insurance company can and will settle. I wish people would stop giving so many false statements....police reports have nothing to do with fault, statue of limitations, % negligance, or anything. It doesn't determine liability, amount of damages, etc.
Originally posted by: Regs
Originally posted by: freebee
Oh shoot, the response I typed is gone...., anyhows to sum it up....
No police report is necessary. Her insurance company can and will settle. I wish people would stop giving so many false statements....police reports have nothing to do with fault, statue of limitations, % negligance, or anything. It doesn't determine liability, amount of damages, etc.
I guess you missed the part when they exhanged no insurance information.
Finally! The ONLY correct reply in the thread!Originally posted by: freebee
Oh shoot, the response I typed is gone...., anyhows to sum it up....
No police report is necessary. Her insurance company can and will settle. I wish people would stop giving so many false statements....police reports have nothing to do with fault, statue of limitations, % negligance, or anything. It doesn't determine liability, amount of damages, etc.
Originally posted by: Ornery
Finally! The ONLY correct reply in the thread!Originally posted by: freebee
Oh shoot, the response I typed is gone...., anyhows to sum it up....
No police report is necessary. Her insurance company can and will settle. I wish people would stop giving so many false statements....police reports have nothing to do with fault, statue of limitations, % negligance, or anything. It doesn't determine liability, amount of damages, etc.
"Tell Jane to tell John's mom that she will be happy to get her mechanic to look at the car and if need be pay her mechanic to replair any damage!"
Got news for ya. You hit MY car, you or your insurance will pay the mechanic of MY choice. You screw around with me, and I'll make doubly damn sure he's the most expensive one I can find!
Originally posted by: Ornery
Finally! The ONLY correct reply in the thread!Originally posted by: freebee
Oh shoot, the response I typed is gone...., anyhows to sum it up....
No police report is necessary. Her insurance company can and will settle. I wish people would stop giving so many false statements....police reports have nothing to do with fault, statue of limitations, % negligance, or anything. It doesn't determine liability, amount of damages, etc.
"Tell Jane to tell John's mom that she will be happy to get her mechanic to look at the car and if need be pay her mechanic to replair any damage!"
Got news for ya. You hit MY car, you or your insurance will pay the mechanic of MY choice. You screw around with me, and I'll make doubly damn sure he's the most expensive one I can find!
Originally posted by: fredtam
Originally posted by: Ornery
Finally! The ONLY correct reply in the thread!Originally posted by: freebee
Oh shoot, the response I typed is gone...., anyhows to sum it up....
No police report is necessary. Her insurance company can and will settle. I wish people would stop giving so many false statements....police reports have nothing to do with fault, statue of limitations, % negligance, or anything. It doesn't determine liability, amount of damages, etc.
"Tell Jane to tell John's mom that she will be happy to get her mechanic to look at the car and if need be pay her mechanic to replair any damage!"
Got news for ya. You hit MY car, you or your insurance will pay the mechanic of MY choice. You screw around with me, and I'll make doubly damn sure he's the most expensive one I can find!
You obviously haven't had to fight an insurance company for money. Your insurance company is there to protect you. I personally have had to fight to have my car repaired because the other persons (at fault) insurance company was trying to get out of paying. This was only a $1500 claim against state farm. I can assure you that if the insurance company gets involved they will not pay him a dime based on the circumstances. Insurance companies do not just go "oh, ok our driver was at fualt here is your money". The only bad adv ice thet has been given is to deny it and not give the insurance info. That is illegal.
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Ornery
Finally! The ONLY correct reply in the thread!Originally posted by: freebee
Oh shoot, the response I typed is gone...., anyhows to sum it up....
No police report is necessary. Her insurance company can and will settle. I wish people would stop giving so many false statements....police reports have nothing to do with fault, statue of limitations, % negligance, or anything. It doesn't determine liability, amount of damages, etc.
"Tell Jane to tell John's mom that she will be happy to get her mechanic to look at the car and if need be pay her mechanic to replair any damage!"
Got news for ya. You hit MY car, you or your insurance will pay the mechanic of MY choice. You screw around with me, and I'll make doubly damn sure he's the most expensive one I can find!
In California, they police don't respond to car accidents unless there's an injury.
