This is statement works because cars, for the most part are mainstream, but if you throw a regular Joe in front of an open source operating system, they won't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Hell, the majority of people that can 'use' a computer don't even know Windows very well.A good mechanic can patch up a rust bucket so that it's drivable, too, but a properly designed car can be used safely without all the extra effort. Fact is, if you give regular Joe a junky car, he's not going to make a lot of repairs before hitting the road. We can't expect people to secure their machines before hooking them up to the Internet.
Originally posted by: TheOmegaCode
This is statement works because cars, for the most part are mainstream, but if you throw a regular Joe in front of an open source operating system, they won't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Hell, the majority of people that can 'use' a computer don't even know Windows very well.A good mechanic can patch up a rust bucket so that it's drivable, too, but a properly designed car can be used safely without all the extra effort. Fact is, if you give regular Joe a junky car, he's not going to make a lot of repairs before hitting the road. We can't expect people to secure their machines before hooking them up to the Internet.
Very good read. Funny how I nitpick that statement, and let the fact that Tocqueville Institution says that 'asserted that freely distributed code is more susceptible to terrorist attack than proprietary software.'![]()
Originally posted by: TheOmegaCode
I think that open source software is awesome, but I also feel it's more complicated. It's not candy coated to the needs of the 'Average Joe,' but I do see what you're saying...
Originally posted by: TheOmegaCode
Check and mate, only because you had to go temp me with Screenshots involving OSX![]()
You're a bad, bad man...
